Skip to content

Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation on Blood Pressure in Elderly People

Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation on Blood Pressure in Elderly People

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02047799
Enrollment
45
Registered
2014-01-28
Start date
2013-04-30
Completion date
2013-06-30
Last updated
2017-11-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

High Blood Pressure

Keywords

elderly people, high blood pressure, vitamin D.

Brief summary

The prevalence and incidence of cardiovascular disease (such as Hypertension) increases exponentially with age (McDermott, 2007;) These diseases account for 30% of the global mortality (WHO, 2011). Vitamin D (VD) insufficiency affects as many as half of otherwise healthy adults in developed countries (Holick, 2007). VD is implicated in the control of blood pressure (BP) through inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system (Yamshchikov, 2009), although the role of VD supplementation for prevention and treatment of the HTA is controversial.The purpose of this study was to investigate if VD supplement in elderly people reduces the levels of BP.

Detailed description

Study population Adults aged ≥ 60 years with essential hypertension were recruited through nursing homes and physical activity groups in the state of Colima, México. 45 subjects were assessed for eligibility at our out-patient clinic. We excluded subjects with impaired renal or hepatic function; also subjects who had been treated with vitamin D within the last three months. None were on hormone replacement therapy, but we included subjects on anti-hypertensive for more than 10 years and the dosages were unchanged during the study. Before randomization, two subjects withdrew the informed consent because of personal reasons, and two subjects were excluded due to the diagnosis of severe hypertension. Design The design was a double-blind, placebo controlled randomized clinical trial. The participants were randomly assigned using a computer-generated randomization code into two groups: group 1 (calcitriol group)with 22 subjects whom were enrolled for 6 weeks of treatment with a daily dose of 1000 IU of cholecalciferol (administered as 1 capsule of 25 μg each) and group 2 with 23 subjects (control group) whom received a similar placebo tablet for also 6 weeks. During treatment, nine subjects (20%) left the trial due to personal reasons. All patients provided written informed consent. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki II and the guidance on Good Clinical Practice (GCP). Approval was obtained from the bioethics committee of the Faculty of Medicine from the University of Colima (FM014/2012). Measurement At the screening visit prior to randomization, subjects had a routine clinical examination and data concerning medical history. BP was measured 3 consecutive days at the same time, using a kit integrated aneroid sphygmomanometer with stethoscope (medimetrics 5769) with the patient seated and with at least 5 min rest. The subjects with average BP \>140/90 mm Hg were included in the study. Once enrolled in the study groups, anthropometrics measurements were collected. The measurements performed were weight and height with light clothing and no shoes, and the indicator body mass index (kg/m2) was calculated. For the determination of serum 25(OH)D,two blood samples were collected in the morning after an overnight fast of minimum 8 h on the day of the randomization and at the end of the study. The patients attended control visits every week for safety measures, adverse event registration and assessment of compliance.Returned pills were counted at each visit, and compliance was calculated as the percentage of used pills compared to the expected number. Biochemistry Serum 25(OH)D concentration were measured with the use of competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA: immunodiagnostic, Bernheim, Germany) after solid-phase extraction (reference range: 17-53 pg/mL). The intra- and interassay CVs for the 2 Vitamin D metabolites were \<7,0% and 9,0%, respectively. Statistical Analysis The data were analyzed with the SPSS version 21. The variables studied were described as frequencies, percentages and as median (interquartile range); inferential statistics were performed with non parametric tests (Mann Whitney and related sample Wilcoxon test), and correlations between variables were analyzed by bivariate correlation analysis by Pearson's correlation. Statistical significance was set at a p value \< 0.05.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTCalcitriol

Subjects whom were enrolled for 6 weeks of treatment with a daily dose of Calcitriol (1000 UI)

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTControl

Subjects whom were enrolled for 6 weeks of treatment with a daily dose of Placebo

Sponsors

Universidad de Colima
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults aged ≥ 60 years with essential hypertension. * Subjects on anti-hypertensive for more than 10 years and the dosages were unchanged during the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects who had been treated with vitamin D within the last three months. * None were on hormone replacement therapy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference of systolic and diastolic blood pressure6 weeksDifference between systolic and diastolic blood pressure before and after treatment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference of Serum 25-Hidroxyvitamin-D6 weeksDifference between 25-Hidroxyvitamin-D before and after treatment.

Countries

Mexico

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 1, 2026