Skip to content

Implementation of Physical Exercise at the Workplace (IRMA09) - Laboratory Technicians

Implementation of Physical Exercise at the Workplace (IRMA09) - Laboratory Technicians

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02047669
Acronym
IRMA
Enrollment
112
Registered
2014-01-28
Start date
2014-03-31
Completion date
2014-07-31
Last updated
2015-09-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Musculoskeletal Disorders, Stress

Brief summary

Musculoskeletal disorders and stress of employees remain a major problem in many occupations. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of an individually tailored bio-psycho-social intervention strategy versus usual care ergonomics and standard physical exercises (reference group) on musculoskeletal pain, work disability, and stress in lab technicians with a history of work-related musculoskeletal pain.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALBiopsychosocial
BEHAVIORALReference

Sponsors

University of Southern Denmark
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Southampton
CollaboratorOTHER
National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Denmark
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 67 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Laboratory technician * Pain intensity \>= 3 (scale of 0-10) * Pain duration \>= 3 months * Pain frequency \>= 3 days per week

Exclusion criteria

* life threatening disease * pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain intensitychange from baseline to week 10The change in pain intensity during the last week (average value of back, neck, shoulder, elbow and hand) from baseline to 10 week follow-up between the individually tailored biopsychosocial group and reference group. 2-way analysis of variance with repeated measures will be used, with time, group and time x group as fixed factors and subject as random factor. Analyses will be controlled for pain intensity at baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Stresschange from baseline to week 10Cohens perceived stress scale

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
WAIchange from baseline to week 10Work ability index questionnaire
Fear Avoidancechange from baseline to week 10Fear avoidance is evaluated by the Fear Avoidance Beliefs questionnaire (FABQ) by Waddell et al. at baseline and follow-up. Briefly, the FABQ is a two-part questionnaire. The first part consists of five questions/statements about pain and physical activity and the second part consists of 11 questions/statements about how work affects the participants' perception of pain. Each question is scored from 0-5 ranging from completely disagree (0) to completely agree (5).
Muscle functionchange from baseline to week 10Muscle strength, function and tenderness of the shoulder, arm, wrist/hand is assessed by maximal isometric voluntary contractions in a custom-built dynamometer (Bofors Elektronik, Karlskoga, Sweden) setting and by pressure-pain threshold testing (PPT). Also rate of force development (RFD), force steadiness (FS), force precision (FP) and fatigue (F) are measured by using custom-made MATLAB programs. The strength tests are a part of an extensive physical examination by trained (and blinded) medical professionals at baseline and follow-up. Muscle activation level is measured by surface electromyography (EMG) (Nexus Mark 10, Mindmedia, Netherlands) on the forearm extensors, shoulder external rotator (Infraspinatus Mm.) and descending part of the trapezius muscle. Further, surface EEG (Nexus Mark 10, Mindmedia, Netherlands) will measure global brain activity during pre- and post testing by using a single a single sensor placement on the forehead (Fpz).

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026