Skip to content

(C2013-0302) Safety and Efficacy of Escalating Doses of SAN-300 in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multiple Ascending Dose Study to Evaluate the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Efficacy of Escalating Doses of SAN-300 in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis With Inadequate Response to Disease-Modifying Anti-rheumatic Drug(s).

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02047604
Enrollment
41
Registered
2014-01-28
Start date
2013-12-31
Completion date
2017-03-23
Last updated
2021-06-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Keywords

Phase 2a multiple ascending dose, Anti-Very Late Antigen-1

Brief summary

A Study to Evaluate the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Efficacy of Escalating Doses of SAN-300 in Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis with Inadequate Response to Disease-Modifying Anti-rheumatic Drug(s).

Interventions

DRUGSAN-300 0.5 mg/kg QW
DRUGSAN-300 1.0 mg/kg QW
DRUGSAN-300 2.0 mg/kg QOW
DRUGSAN-300 4.0 mg/kg QOW
DRUGSAN-300 4.0 mg/kg QW
DRUGPlacebo

Sponsors

Bausch Health Americas, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Diagnosed with RA for ≥ 6 months according to American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Classification Criteria 2010 2. 18 to 75 years of age, inclusive, at the time of informed consent 3. Swollen joint count of ≥ 6 (66-joint count) and tender joint count of ≥ 6 (68-joint count) at Screening and randomization 4. Inadequate response to therapy or discontinuation of therapy because of unacceptable toxicity from at least one prior traditional or biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) 5. Stable dose of methotrexate (≥ 15 mg/week and ≤ 25 mg/week) for ≥ 6 weeks before randomization

Exclusion criteria

1. Functional Class IV as defined by ACR classification of functional status in RA 2. History of significant systemic involvement secondary to RA (e.g., vasculitis, pulmonary fibrosis, or Felty's syndrome) 3. History of malignancy or carcinoma in situ within the 5 years before Screening or any history of melanoma. Patients with history of excised or adequately treated non-melanoma skin cancer are eligible 4. Evidence of clinically significant uncontrolled concurrent diseases such as cardiovascular, endocrinologic, hematologic, hepatic, immunologic, metabolic, urologic, pulmonary, neurologic, dermatologic, psychiatric, renal, and/or other major diseases 5. History of recurrent clinically significant infections 6. Current active infection or serious local infection (e.g., cellulitis, abscess) or systemic infection (e.g., pneumonia, septicemia) within 3 months before randomization 7. History of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions to other biologic agents 8. History of allergies to murine protein 9. Surgery within 3 months before randomization (other than minor cosmetic surgery or minor dental procedures) or plans for a surgical procedure during the Treatment Period or Follow-up Period 10. History of tuberculosis or latent infection currently undergoing treatment 11. History of malaria 12. Treatment regimen with prednisone that is either over 10 mg/day (or equivalent dose of another corticosteroid) or is not taken at a stable dose of ≤ 10 mg/day for at least 4 weeks before randomization 13. Intra-articular corticosteroid injection(s) within 4 weeks before randomization 14. Any live immunization/vaccination, including against Herpes zoster, within 4 weeks before randomization. Live vaccinations must also be avoided throughout the study 15. Abnormal laboratory value at Screening or Day -1 considered clinically significant 16. Positive for hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody or hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) 17. Positive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibody 18. History of tuberculosis or positive QuantiFERON®-TB Gold test (QFT)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Adverse Events10 weeksAdverse events data are collected during a 10-week period, which includes 6 weeks of treatment and 4 weeks of follow-up.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score With 28-joint Count Using C-reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP)Baseline, End of Treatment Visit (Week 7)DAS28-CRP= 0.56 x sqrt(TJC28) x sqrt(SJC28) + 0.36 x ln(CRP+1) +0.014 x VAS +0.96 Where TJC28: The number of tender joints (0-28). SJC28: The number of swollen joints (0-28). CRP: The C-Reactive Protein level (in mg/l). VAS General Health Assessment (from 0=best to 100=worst). ln=natural log. sqrt = square root. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
Number of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response.End of Treatment Visit (Week 7)A participant is considered to have an ACR20 response if there is an improvement of 20% in all of the following: * Swollen joint count (66 joints) * Tender joint count (68 joints) and * At least three of the following five assessments: * Patient's assessment of pain * Patient's global assessment of disease activity * Physician's global assessment of disease activity * Patient's assessment of physical function, as measured by the HAQ-DI * CRP

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disease Index (HAQ-DI)Baseline, End of Treatment Visit (Week 7)HAQ assesses the degree of difficulty a participant has had in accomplishing tasks in eight functional areas, over the previous week. 1. dressing and grooming, 2. rising, 3. eating, 4. walking, 5. hygiene, 6. reach, 7. grip, 8. common daily activities. For each of these categories, participants report amount of difficulty they have in performing two or three specific activities. There are four possible responses for the HAQ questions: without ANY difficulty (0), with SOME difficulty (1), with MUCH difficulty (2) and UNABLE to do (3). Scores for each of the eight categories are calculated. HAQ is calculated by adjusting the score for each of these categories, if necessary, based upon the patient's use of an aid, device, or assistance for that category, totaling the sum of the category scores and dividing by the number of categories answered. HAQ can range from 0 to 3. Higher scores (greater level of difficulty) indicate worse outcome.
Bone Erosion Detected Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Findings of the Hand and Wrist - Change From BaselineBaseline, End of Treatment Visit (Week 7)Bone Erosion detected by MRI of hand/wrist was scored using the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials (OMERACT) RA MRI scoring (RAMRIS) system. Bone erosion was scored 0-10, according to the proportion (in increments of 10%) of erosion of articular bone: 0: 0%, 1: 1%-10%, 2: 11%-20%, ……..10: 91%-100%. Higher scores (more erosion) indicate worse outcome.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cohort A - SAN-300 0.5 mg/kg QW
SAN-300 0.5 mg/kg subcutaneous once weekly for six weeks
6
Cohort B - SAN-300 1.0 mg/kg QW
SAN-300 1.0 mg/kg subcutaneous once weekly for six weeks
7
Cohort C - SAN-300 2.0 mg/kg QOW
SAN-300 2.0 mg/kg subcutaneous every other week for six weeks
6
Cohort D - SAN-300 4.0 mg/kg QOW
SAN-300 4.0 mg/kg subcutaneous every other week for six weeks
6
Cohort E - SAN-300 4.0 mg/kg QW
SAN-300 4.0 mg/kg subcutaneous once weekly for six weeks
6
Placebo
Placebo dosing
10
Total41

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject000011

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCohort A - SAN-300 0.5 mg/kg QWCohort B - SAN-300 1.0 mg/kg QWCohort C - SAN-300 2.0 mg/kg QOWCohort D - SAN-300 4.0 mg/kg QOWCohort E - SAN-300 4.0 mg/kg QWPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous56.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.82
60.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.65
59.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.87
49.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.59
55.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.42
57.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.85
56.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.59
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants1 Participants6 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants6 Participants5 Participants6 Participants4 Participants9 Participants35 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants1 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
4 Participants7 Participants4 Participants5 Participants4 Participants8 Participants32 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants4 Participants6 Participants4 Participants5 Participants9 Participants33 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants3 Participants0 Participants2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 60 / 70 / 60 / 60 / 60 / 10
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 61 / 71 / 66 / 62 / 63 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 60 / 70 / 62 / 60 / 60 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

Adverse events data are collected during a 10-week period, which includes 6 weeks of treatment and 4 weeks of follow-up.

Time frame: 10 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort A - SAN-300 0.5 mg/kg QWNumber of Participants With Adverse Events5 Participants
Cohort B - SAN-300 1.0 mg/kg QWNumber of Participants With Adverse Events4 Participants
Cohort C - SAN-300 2.0 mg/kg QOWNumber of Participants With Adverse Events2 Participants
Cohort D - SAN-300 4.0 mg/kg QOWNumber of Participants With Adverse Events6 Participants
Cohort E - SAN-300 4.0 mg/kg QWNumber of Participants With Adverse Events4 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Events7 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score With 28-joint Count Using C-reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP)

DAS28-CRP= 0.56 x sqrt(TJC28) x sqrt(SJC28) + 0.36 x ln(CRP+1) +0.014 x VAS +0.96 Where TJC28: The number of tender joints (0-28). SJC28: The number of swollen joints (0-28). CRP: The C-Reactive Protein level (in mg/l). VAS General Health Assessment (from 0=best to 100=worst). ln=natural log. sqrt = square root. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline, End of Treatment Visit (Week 7)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A - SAN-300 0.5 mg/kg QWChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score With 28-joint Count Using C-reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP)-4.433 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.2736
Cohort B - SAN-300 1.0 mg/kg QWChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score With 28-joint Count Using C-reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP)-3.663 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.9716
Cohort C - SAN-300 2.0 mg/kg QOWChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score With 28-joint Count Using C-reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP)-2.002 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.8276
Cohort D - SAN-300 4.0 mg/kg QOWChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score With 28-joint Count Using C-reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP)-3.818 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.9164
Cohort E - SAN-300 4.0 mg/kg QWChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score With 28-joint Count Using C-reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP)-2.928 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.9874
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Disease Activity Score With 28-joint Count Using C-reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP)-3.028 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.2505
Secondary

Number of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response.

A participant is considered to have an ACR20 response if there is an improvement of 20% in all of the following: * Swollen joint count (66 joints) * Tender joint count (68 joints) and * At least three of the following five assessments: * Patient's assessment of pain * Patient's global assessment of disease activity * Physician's global assessment of disease activity * Patient's assessment of physical function, as measured by the HAQ-DI * CRP

Time frame: End of Treatment Visit (Week 7)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort A - SAN-300 0.5 mg/kg QWNumber of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response.3 Participants
Cohort B - SAN-300 1.0 mg/kg QWNumber of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response.3 Participants
Cohort C - SAN-300 2.0 mg/kg QOWNumber of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response.1 Participants
Cohort D - SAN-300 4.0 mg/kg QOWNumber of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response.2 Participants
Cohort E - SAN-300 4.0 mg/kg QWNumber of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response.1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response.3 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Bone Erosion Detected Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Findings of the Hand and Wrist - Change From Baseline

Bone Erosion detected by MRI of hand/wrist was scored using the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials (OMERACT) RA MRI scoring (RAMRIS) system. Bone erosion was scored 0-10, according to the proportion (in increments of 10%) of erosion of articular bone: 0: 0%, 1: 1%-10%, 2: 11%-20%, ……..10: 91%-100%. Higher scores (more erosion) indicate worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline, End of Treatment Visit (Week 7)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A - SAN-300 0.5 mg/kg QWBone Erosion Detected Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Findings of the Hand and Wrist - Change From Baseline-0.73 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.496
Cohort B - SAN-300 1.0 mg/kg QWBone Erosion Detected Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Findings of the Hand and Wrist - Change From Baseline0.25 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.214
Cohort C - SAN-300 2.0 mg/kg QOWBone Erosion Detected Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Findings of the Hand and Wrist - Change From Baseline0 units on a scaleStandard Error 0
Cohort D - SAN-300 4.0 mg/kg QOWBone Erosion Detected Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Findings of the Hand and Wrist - Change From Baseline0.13 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.125
Cohort E - SAN-300 4.0 mg/kg QWBone Erosion Detected Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Findings of the Hand and Wrist - Change From Baseline0.22 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.222
PlaceboBone Erosion Detected Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Findings of the Hand and Wrist - Change From Baseline0.13 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.125
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disease Index (HAQ-DI)

HAQ assesses the degree of difficulty a participant has had in accomplishing tasks in eight functional areas, over the previous week. 1. dressing and grooming, 2. rising, 3. eating, 4. walking, 5. hygiene, 6. reach, 7. grip, 8. common daily activities. For each of these categories, participants report amount of difficulty they have in performing two or three specific activities. There are four possible responses for the HAQ questions: without ANY difficulty (0), with SOME difficulty (1), with MUCH difficulty (2) and UNABLE to do (3). Scores for each of the eight categories are calculated. HAQ is calculated by adjusting the score for each of these categories, if necessary, based upon the patient's use of an aid, device, or assistance for that category, totaling the sum of the category scores and dividing by the number of categories answered. HAQ can range from 0 to 3. Higher scores (greater level of difficulty) indicate worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline, End of Treatment Visit (Week 7)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort A - SAN-300 0.5 mg/kg QWChange From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disease Index (HAQ-DI)-0.333 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.335
Cohort B - SAN-300 1.0 mg/kg QWChange From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disease Index (HAQ-DI)-0.018 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.064
Cohort C - SAN-300 2.0 mg/kg QOWChange From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disease Index (HAQ-DI)-0.146 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
Cohort D - SAN-300 4.0 mg/kg QOWChange From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disease Index (HAQ-DI)-0.313 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.313
Cohort E - SAN-300 4.0 mg/kg QWChange From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disease Index (HAQ-DI)0.042 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disease Index (HAQ-DI)-0.111 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.129

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026