Skip to content

Steam Ablation Versus Endovenous Laser Ablation for the Treatment of Great Saphenous Veins

Comparative Randomized Clinical Trial of Steam Ablation Versus Endovenous Laser Ablation for the Treatment of Great Saphenous Veins

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02046967
Acronym
LAST
Enrollment
237
Registered
2014-01-28
Start date
2009-11-30
Completion date
2013-03-31
Last updated
2014-01-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Varicose Veins, Varicose Veins of Leg With Long Saphenous Vein Distribution

Keywords

endovenous laser ablation, endovenous steam ablation, great saphenous veins, quality of life

Brief summary

Endovenous laser ablation is a common therapy of great saphenous vein insufficiency with a very high success rate. It works by heating and thereby obliterating the vein. Steam ablation is a new therapy that also works by heating and thereby obliterating the vein. The hypothesis of this study is that steam ablation is as effective as laser ablation, but that it results in better secondary outcomes (e.g., lower pain scores).

Detailed description

The study is a randomized clinical trial comparing two different therapies for endovenous ablation of great saphenous veins. The aim of the study is to test whether the anatomical success rate of Steam Ablation is not inferior to that of Endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) in treatment of great saphenous vein insufficiency and compare the treatment safety, patient reported outcomes and cost-effectiveness analyses between EVLA and Steam Ablation.

Interventions

PROCEDUREEndovenous laser ablation with 940 nm bare fiber

Endovenous laser ablation with 940 nm Diode laser using a bare fiber for treating the Great Saphenous Vein.

PROCEDUREEndovenous steam ablation with steam vein sclerosis system.

Endovenous steam ablation with steam vein sclerosis.

Sponsors

Erasmus Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients over 18 years old * Insufficiency of the GSV measured with ultrasound imaging, reflux \> 0.5 s, and diameter of vein \> 0.5 cm * Symptoms of chronic venous insufficiency * No prior treatment of the insufficient GSV * Informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Acute deep or superficial vein thrombosis * Agenesis of deep vein system * Vascular malformation or syndrome * Post-thrombotic syndrome, occlusive type * Pregnancy * Immobility * Allergy to lidocaine * Arterial insufficiency

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Obliteration of varicose vein and/ or absence of reflux (>0.5 sec. of retrograde flow over >10cm) along the treated segment of the great saphenous vein (GSV) at 12 and 52 weeks.52 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Major complications: deep and superficial venous thrombosis (embolic events), nerve injury, skin burns, and (sub)cutaneous infections.12 weeks
Minor complications: ecchymosis, pain and hyperpigmentation.12 weeks
Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS)12 weeks
Treatment satisfaction2 weeks
Pain score2 weeks
Health related quality of life will be measured using the Dutch Translated Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ).12 weeks

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026