Skip to content

The Impact of an Investment Based Intervention on Weight-loss and Beliefs About Food in Patients Post Bariatric Surgery

The Impact of an Investment Based Intervention on Weight-loss and Beliefs About Food in Patients Post Bariatric Surgery.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02045628
Enrollment
212
Registered
2014-01-27
Start date
2013-11-30
Completion date
2016-03-31
Last updated
2016-03-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obesity

Keywords

Bariatric Surgery, Health Psychology

Brief summary

Although obesity surgery is currently the most effective method for achieving weight loss, not all patients lose the desired amount of weight and some show weight regain. Previous pilot work by the lead researcher shows that successful weight loss is associated with the amount of investment the patient feels that they have made in their operation. For example, those who feel that it has taken more time and effort to organise, has cost more money, has been more disruptive to their family, social and work lives and has caused pain are more likely to lose weight after their operation. Therefore, it seems as if the greater the sense of investment, the greater the motivation to make the operation a success. The present study aims to build on these findings by encouraging weight loss surgery patients to focus on the investment they have made, thus making their investment more salient to them. Using a trial design, half the patients will be asked to rate and describe the investment they have made in their operation just before surgery (focusing on the time and effort to organise the surgery etc) and 3 months after surgery (focusing on time off work for recovery, disruption of family and friends, pain of surgery, pain of having the stitches removed etc). All patients will record their weight, beliefs about food, intentions to change their behaviour and actual eating and exercise behaviour at baseline then 3, 6 and 12 months follow up. The impact of the investment based intervention will then be assessed to explore whether focusing on the investment involved in having surgery improves patient health outcomes by one year.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALInvestment intervention

Those in the investment group will complete carefully framed questions designed to raise the salience of the investment they have made in their procedure at baseline and 3 months follow up. The content of this intervention will be tailored to the recent experiences of the patient (ie pre or post surgery).

Sponsors

University College London Hospitals
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Surrey
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* aged 18 or over * having bariatric surgery at University College Hospital

Exclusion criteria

* if the patient does not understand English * if the patient does not consent to take part in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in weight12 months follow up.Excess weight loss at 12 months after bariatric surgery.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in psychological outcomes12 month follow upPsychological issues relating to beliefs about food, intentions to change diet and exercise and actual diet and exercise behaviours.

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 17, 2026