Age-related Hearing Impairment 1, Personal Communication
Conditions
Brief summary
The primary purpose of the study is to develop and test the preliminary efficacy of a first-in-kind community-based intervention to provide affordable, accessible and effective hearing health care to low-income, minority older adults.
Detailed description
Age-related hearing impairment is strongly associated with poorer communicative functioning and social isolation, but hearing impairment often goes undiagnosed and untreated, particularly among minority and low-income older adults. Novel interventions that translate research on social engagement, minority health, and hearing technology are needed to expand delivery of hearing health care to underserved older adults. The Baltimore Hearing Equality through Accessible Research and Solutions (HEARS) project will develop and pilot a first-in-kind community-based intervention to provide affordable, accessible, and effective hearing health care to minority and low-income older adults and their communication partners. The study will follow a mixed-methods approach that will incorporate quantitative and qualitative components throughout the formative and evaluative processes. Participants and their communication partners will be randomized to an immediate treatment group or a 3-month delayed treatment group. The investigators hypothesize that the intervention is associated with increased social engagement and communication, improved quality of life, and decreased loneliness and third-party disability in the immediate treatment compared to the delayed treatment group.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALBaltimore HEARS
Tailored aural rehabilitation for participant and communication partner
Sponsors
American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation
Johns Hopkins University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Age 60 years or older * English-speaking * Aural-oral verbal communication as primary communication modality * Post-lingual hearing loss * Does not currently use a hearing amplification device or hearing aid * Signed informed consent to participate in baseline, 1 month, and 3 month assessments * Have a communication partner able to accompany them to all study-related appointments
Exclusion criteria
* Individuals who do not fulfill inclusion criteria * Score ≤ 25 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly (HHIE)-S at 3 Months | 3 months | Mean change, Unpooled - comparing baseline to 3 month follow-up visit Measure Description: Measure was collected through a one-on-one interview with a trained data collector. Scoring: 0-8 suggests no hearing handicap 10-24 suggests mild-moderate hearing handicap 26-40 suggests significant hearing handicap |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Revised QDS at 3 Months | 3 months | Mean change, Unpooled - comparing baseline to 3 month follow-up visit \[1\] Measure Description: Measure was collected through a one-on-one interview conducted by a trained data collector. Survey includes 5 questions, scored Strongly disagree, Slightly disagree, neither, slightly agree, or strongly agree (1, 2, 3, 4, 5) Scoring is from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). Scores were summed across each of the 5 survey questions resulting in a total range of 5 (worst) to 25 (best) Although utilized in multiple studies, including Yueh et al., 2001, there are no numerical anchors for what would represent a clinically important difference. |
| Change From Baseline in Revised UCLA at 3 Months | 3 months | Mean change, Unpooled - comparing baseline to 3 month follow-up visit \[1\] Measure Description: Measure was collected via a one-on-one interview conducted by a trained data collector. 20-item Likert-type scale. Total score is sum of the 20 items, scores range from 20 to 80. Lower values equate to lower levels of loneliness and higher values equate to higher levels of loneliness. Perry et al., 1990 uses the following score ranges: 20-34 - Low degree of loneliness 35-49 - Moderate degree of loneliness 50-64 - Moderately high degree of loneliness 65-80 - High degree of loneliness |
| Change From Baseline in PHQ-9 at 3 Months | 3 months | Mean change, Unpooled - comparing baseline to 3 month follow-up visit \[1\] Measure Description: Measure collected via one-on-one interview conducted by trained data collectors. Total of 9 questions, scored from 0 to 3. The score from each question are summed to a total score, which can range from 0 to 27. Interpretation of Total Score Total Score Depression Severity 0 No depression 1-4 Minimal depression 5-9 Mild depression 10-14 Moderate depression 15-19 Moderately severe depression 20-27 Severe depression. Change from baseline to 3 months was reported. An increase in the score from baseline to three months (a positive number) indicates a worsening in depression severity. A decrease in the score from baseline to three months (a negative number) indicates a reduction in depression severity. |
| Change From Baseline in SF-36 Mental Component at 3 Months | 3 months | Mean change, Unpooled - comparing baseline to 3 month follow-up visit Data were collected via one-on-one interviews with trained data collectors. Standard scoring can be found at http://www.rand.org/health/surveys\_tools/mos/36-item-short-form/scoring.html. Higher scores indicate better mental health functioning; U.S. population norm: M = 50.0, SD = 10.0, range = \[2-74\]. |
| Change From Baseline in SF-36 Physical Component at 3 Months | 3 months | Mean change, Unpooled - comparing baseline to 3 month follow-up visit Measure collected via one-on-one interview conducted by trained data collectors. Standard scoring can be found at http://www.rand.org/health/surveys\_tools/mos/36-item-short-form/scoring.html. Higher scores indicate better physical health functioning; U.S. population norm: M = 50, SD = 9.95, range = \[4-71\]. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Immediate Treatment Group Immediate treatment with Baltimore HEARS intervention
Baltimore HEARS: Tailored aural rehabilitation for participant and communication partner
Baltimore HEARS: Tailored fitting and programming of a personal sound amplifier. This will be accompanied by a component of aural rehabilitation. | 8 |
| Delayed Treatment Group 3-month delayed treatment with Baltimore HEARS intervention
Baltimore HEARS: Tailored aural rehabilitation for participant and communication partner
Baltimore HEARS: Tailored fitting and programming of a personal sound amplifier. This will be accompanied by a component of aural rehabilitation. | 7 |
| Total | 15 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Delayed Treatment Group | Total | Immediate Treatment Group |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 72.2 years | 70.1 years | 69.9 years |
| Hearing screening threshold | 31.7 dB HL | 40 dB HL | 45.8 dB HL |
| HHIE-S (Hearing handicap inventory for the elderly - screening) | 20 units on a scale | 20 units on a scale | 19 units on a scale |
| Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) | 8 units on a scale | 8 units on a scale | 9.5 units on a scale |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized African American or Other | 5 participants | 9 participants | 4 participants |
| Revised Quantified Denver Scale of Communication Function (QDS) | 16 units on a scale | 16 units on a scale | 16 units on a scale |
| Revised University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Loneliness Scale | 46 units on a scale | 46 units on a scale | 46 units on a scale |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 3 Participants | 8 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 4 Participants | 7 Participants | 3 Participants |
| SF-36 physical component (Quality of Life) | 50.6 units on a scale | 46.3 units on a scale | 41.5 units on a scale |
| Short Form - 36 (SF) -36 mental component (Quality of Life) | 56.6 units on a scale | 54.4 units on a scale | 50.9 units on a scale |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 8 | 0 / 7 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 8 | 0 / 7 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 8 | 0 / 7 |
Outcome results
Primary
Change From Baseline in Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly (HHIE)-S at 3 Months
Mean change, Unpooled - comparing baseline to 3 month follow-up visit Measure Description: Measure was collected through a one-on-one interview with a trained data collector. Scoring: 0-8 suggests no hearing handicap 10-24 suggests mild-moderate hearing handicap 26-40 suggests significant hearing handicap
Time frame: 3 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate Treatment Group | Change From Baseline in Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly (HHIE)-S at 3 Months | -8.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.4 |
| Delayed Treatment Group | Change From Baseline in Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly (HHIE)-S at 3 Months | 0.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.5 |
Secondary
Change From Baseline in PHQ-9 at 3 Months
Mean change, Unpooled - comparing baseline to 3 month follow-up visit \[1\] Measure Description: Measure collected via one-on-one interview conducted by trained data collectors. Total of 9 questions, scored from 0 to 3. The score from each question are summed to a total score, which can range from 0 to 27. Interpretation of Total Score Total Score Depression Severity 0 No depression 1-4 Minimal depression 5-9 Mild depression 10-14 Moderate depression 15-19 Moderately severe depression 20-27 Severe depression. Change from baseline to 3 months was reported. An increase in the score from baseline to three months (a positive number) indicates a worsening in depression severity. A decrease in the score from baseline to three months (a negative number) indicates a reduction in depression severity.
Time frame: 3 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate Treatment Group | Change From Baseline in PHQ-9 at 3 Months | -4.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.4 |
| Delayed Treatment Group | Change From Baseline in PHQ-9 at 3 Months | -1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.7 |
Secondary
Change From Baseline in Revised QDS at 3 Months
Mean change, Unpooled - comparing baseline to 3 month follow-up visit \[1\] Measure Description: Measure was collected through a one-on-one interview conducted by a trained data collector. Survey includes 5 questions, scored Strongly disagree, Slightly disagree, neither, slightly agree, or strongly agree (1, 2, 3, 4, 5) Scoring is from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). Scores were summed across each of the 5 survey questions resulting in a total range of 5 (worst) to 25 (best) Although utilized in multiple studies, including Yueh et al., 2001, there are no numerical anchors for what would represent a clinically important difference.
Time frame: 3 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate Treatment Group | Change From Baseline in Revised QDS at 3 Months | -5.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.8 |
| Delayed Treatment Group | Change From Baseline in Revised QDS at 3 Months | -2.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.3 |
Secondary
Change From Baseline in Revised UCLA at 3 Months
Mean change, Unpooled - comparing baseline to 3 month follow-up visit \[1\] Measure Description: Measure was collected via a one-on-one interview conducted by a trained data collector. 20-item Likert-type scale. Total score is sum of the 20 items, scores range from 20 to 80. Lower values equate to lower levels of loneliness and higher values equate to higher levels of loneliness. Perry et al., 1990 uses the following score ranges: 20-34 - Low degree of loneliness 35-49 - Moderate degree of loneliness 50-64 - Moderately high degree of loneliness 65-80 - High degree of loneliness
Time frame: 3 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate Treatment Group | Change From Baseline in Revised UCLA at 3 Months | -2.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.8 |
| Delayed Treatment Group | Change From Baseline in Revised UCLA at 3 Months | -4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.2 |
Secondary
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Mental Component at 3 Months
Mean change, Unpooled - comparing baseline to 3 month follow-up visit Data were collected via one-on-one interviews with trained data collectors. Standard scoring can be found at http://www.rand.org/health/surveys\_tools/mos/36-item-short-form/scoring.html. Higher scores indicate better mental health functioning; U.S. population norm: M = 50.0, SD = 10.0, range = \[2-74\].
Time frame: 3 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate Treatment Group | Change From Baseline in SF-36 Mental Component at 3 Months | 2.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.7 |
| Delayed Treatment Group | Change From Baseline in SF-36 Mental Component at 3 Months | 1.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 14 |
Secondary
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Physical Component at 3 Months
Mean change, Unpooled - comparing baseline to 3 month follow-up visit Measure collected via one-on-one interview conducted by trained data collectors. Standard scoring can be found at http://www.rand.org/health/surveys\_tools/mos/36-item-short-form/scoring.html. Higher scores indicate better physical health functioning; U.S. population norm: M = 50, SD = 9.95, range = \[4-71\].
Time frame: 3 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate Treatment Group | Change From Baseline in SF-36 Physical Component at 3 Months | 3.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.8 |
| Delayed Treatment Group | Change From Baseline in SF-36 Physical Component at 3 Months | -1.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.4 |