Skip to content

Healing Rate of Leg Wounds Treated With Contact and Noncontact Ultrasound: The VIP Ultrasound Protocol

Healing Rate of Chronic and Sub-Acute Lower Extremity Ulcers Treated With Contact Ultrasound Followed by MIST Therapy: The VIP Ultrasound Protocol

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02045303
Enrollment
11
Registered
2014-01-24
Start date
2014-02-28
Completion date
2015-08-31
Last updated
2022-01-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Ulcer of Lower Extremity

Keywords

Sub-acute wound, Chronic wound, Wound, MIST, Soring, Contact Ultrasound, Noncontact ultrasound, Wound Care, VIP Ultrasound Protocol, Ultrasound

Brief summary

Wound healing rate is higher when contact ultrasound therapy is followed by noncontact ultrasound therapy on sub-acute and chronic lower extremity ulcers of various etiologies requiring selective debridement, as compared to either Sonoca-180 or MIST Therapy alone.

Detailed description

This prospective pilot study is designed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of a wound care ultrasound treatment protocol for sub-acute or chronic wounds of the lower extremity and of any etiology. The Viana-Pompeo (VIP) ultrasound protocol consists of high intensity, low frequency, contact ultrasound therapy (with Sonoca-180) followed by low intensity, low-frequency, noncontact ultrasound therapy (with MIST Therapy). Previously published healing rates for each of the ultrasonic therapy modalities will be used as a comparison. The Physical Therapist will perform the initial assessment and treatment, and devise an individualized plan of care that involves contact ultrasound followed by noncontact ultrasound. Subjects may remain in the study for up to 12 weeks, or up to when end of study criteria is met. Transition from contact mode to noncontact mode will happen when: \- Wound is sufficiently clean with ≤ 20% of necrotic tissue or adherent slough. OR \- \>= 80% of soft slough is easily removed from the wound bed with mechanical or selective debridement before or after treatment OR \- Wound bed quality has failed to progress after 3 consecutive contact ultrasound treatments For the purposes of this study, treatments will be performed 3 times a week. Treatment time will be dependent on the wound area, at least 20 sec/cm2, per standard protocol. Only the wounds present during Physical Therapy (PT) initial assessment will be included in the research. If the patient develops new wounds during the course of the research, the patient will receive appropriate treatment, but such wounds will not be part of the study. Patients in the wound clinic setting are allowed to perform home dressing changes as ordered by the physician in addition to the dressing changes performed by the therapist or wound clinic nurse on clinic visit days. Patients and/or caregivers will be trained in dressing changes techniques and must understand the procedure prior to performing dressing changes on their own. In addition to ultrasonic treatment and dressing changes, wound debridement may be performed each visit as needed. Digital photography and wound measurements will also be performed weekly and as needed. End of PT wound therapy may be before, at, or after the end of the study period. The beginning of the MIST therapy will depend on the individual characteristics and wound needs. A minimum of 4 MIST treatments must be completed for a patient's data to be included the data analysis in the acute care setting. A minimum of 2 treatments per week (goal of 3 per week) must be reached for the 12 week period for a patient's data to be included in the data analysis. Study Endpoints Primary endpoint: * Wound area reduction * Percent granulation tissue * Length of the study for ambulatory subjects: 12 weeks from Start of Contact Ultrasound therapy Secondary endpoint: * Wound closure at any point within the length of study * Failure to note improvement in wound area, and/or wound volume, and/or wound bed quality after 4 consecutive weeks of treatment. * 3 consecutive missed visits, or a total of 7 missed visits

Interventions

DEVICEContact Ultrasound Therapy

Following our protocol, the ultrasound wound therapy will start with contact ultrasound until it meets criteria to switch to noncontact ultrasound therapy.

DEVICENoncontact Ultrasound Therapy

Transition from contact to noncontact ultrasound when criteria for transition is met per our protocol.

Sponsors

Celleration, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Texas Health Resources
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient is referred to Physical Therapy for contact ultrasound (which is included in the VIP protocol); * Lower extremity (including foot) wound(s) of any etiology; * Wound(s) presenting with slough, necrotic tissue, and/or non-viable tissue requiring debridement; * Wound is present for 4 weeks or longer at the start of ultrasonic therapy; * Insurance approval is obtained for Contact and Noncontact ultrasound treatments, in the ambulatory setting; * Patient is 18 years of age or older; * Female patient attesting not to be pregnant; * Not undergoing Vacuum Assisted Closure (VAC) therapy.

Exclusion criteria

* Patient is referred to Physical Therapy for noncontact ultrasound only; * Wound(s) not on lower extremity; * Clean wound(s) that do not require debridement; * Wound onset less than 4 weeks prior to the start of ultrasonic therapy; * Malignancies on the treatment area; * Patients in the ambulatory setting whose insurance did not approve them for both contact and noncontact ultrasound therapy; * Patient is under 18 years of age; * Female patient attesting to be pregnant; * VAC Therapy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total Wound AreaInitial measurement at day 1 and measurement at the subject's last visit at 12 weeks or sooner if the wound closed before then.Mean and Standard Deviation of the group's total wound area at day one and last treatment day. Wound area was measured as Length x Width. This is to assess the change in area, in order to assess wound progress towards closure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total Wound VolumeInitial measurement at day 1 and measurement at the subject's last visit at 12 weeks or sooner if the wound closed before then.Mean and Standard Deviation of the group's total wound volume at day one and last treatment day. Wound volume was measured as Length x Width X Depth (when able to determine depth). This is to assess the change in volume, in order to assess wound progress towards closure.
Wounds With Slough/Eschar Reduction on Visit 2 and Wounds With Slough/Eschar Reduction at Last VisitDay 2 and measurement at the subject's last visit at 12 weeks or sooner if the wound closed before then.Mean and Standard Deviation of the group's percent adherent and/or non-adherent slough present in the wound bed at day one and last treatment day. This is to assess the change in slough/eschar. This is to determine progression from contact to noncontact ultrasound therapy, as well as to determine progress of wound bed quality.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Wounds With Granulation Present on Visit 1 and Wounds With Granulation Present at Last VisitInitial measurement at day 1 and measurement at the subject's last visit at 12 weeks or sooner if the wound closed before then.Mean and Standard Deviation of the group's total percent of granulation tissue present in the wound bed at day one and last treatment day. This is to assess the change in granulation, in order to assess progress of wound bed quality.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study enrolled subjects who had sub-acute or chronic lower leg wound requiring debridement, who were coming to the outpatient wound care clinic for follow up with wound care doctor.

Pre-assignment details

The wound care doctor wrote orders for ultrasound therapy performed by Physical Therapist (PT). Throughout the open enrollment phase, the PT screened referred patients to check if they met study criteria.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Wound Age Between 4 and 21 Weeks
Both groups underwent the same protocol of contact ultrasound followed by non-contact ultrasound therapy, with the goal of 3x/week treatment frequency. Study data for this group was collected over a period of 12 weeks or up to the time of wound closure.
4
Wound Age Between 4 and 21 Weeks
Both groups underwent the same protocol of contact ultrasound followed by non-contact ultrasound therapy, with the goal of 3x/week treatment frequency. Study data for this group was collected over a period of 12 weeks or up to the time of wound closure.
4
Wound Age >=47 Weeks
Both groups underwent the same protocol of contact ultrasound followed by non-contact ultrasound therapy, with the goal of 3x/week treatment frequency. Study data for this group was collected over a period of 12 weeks.
2
Wound Age >=47 Weeks
Both groups underwent the same protocol of contact ultrasound followed by non-contact ultrasound therapy, with the goal of 3x/week treatment frequency. Study data for this group was collected over a period of 12 weeks.
8
Total18

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyProtocol Violation210
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject020

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicWound Age Between 4 and 21 WeeksTotalWound Age >=47 Weeks
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Associated Diagnosis
3rd Degree Burn
0 Wounds5 Wounds5 Wounds
Associated Diagnosis
Above Knee Amputation (opposite limb)
1 Wounds1 Wounds0 Wounds
Associated Diagnosis
Cat Bite
1 Wounds1 Wounds0 Wounds
Associated Diagnosis
Diabetes
2 Wounds5 Wounds3 Wounds
Associated Diagnosis
Peripheral Artery Disease
2 Wounds2 Wounds0 Wounds
Associated Diagnosis
Post-Surgical Debridement
1 Wounds1 Wounds0 Wounds
Associated Diagnosis
S/p Ganglion Cyst Removal
1 Wounds1 Wounds0 Wounds
Associated Diagnosis
Stage IV Pressure Ulcer
1 Wounds1 Wounds0 Wounds
Associated Diagnosis
Vasculitis
0 Wounds3 Wounds3 Wounds
Associated Diagnosis
Venous Insufficiency
0 Wounds5 Wounds5 Wounds
Initial Wound Area10.12 cm^28.66083 cm^27.93125 cm^2
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
3 Participants4 Participants1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants4 Participants1 Participants
Wound Location
Ankle
0 Wounds1 Wounds1 Wounds
Wound Location
Foot/Heel/Toes
3 Wounds5 Wounds2 Wounds
Wound Location
Knee
0 Wounds1 Wounds1 Wounds
Wound Location
Lower Leg
1 Wounds5 Wounds4 Wounds

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 40 / 2
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 40 / 2

Outcome results

Primary

Total Wound Area

Mean and Standard Deviation of the group's total wound area at day one and last treatment day. Wound area was measured as Length x Width. This is to assess the change in area, in order to assess wound progress towards closure.

Time frame: Initial measurement at day 1 and measurement at the subject's last visit at 12 weeks or sooner if the wound closed before then.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Wound Age Between 4 and 21 WeeksTotal Wound AreaInitial Wound Area7.93125 Squared centimitersStandard Deviation 5.96128
Wound Age Between 4 and 21 WeeksTotal Wound AreaWound Area on Last Study Visit1.3275 Squared centimitersStandard Deviation 2.61515
Wound Age >=47 WeeksTotal Wound AreaInitial Wound Area7.93125 Squared centimitersStandard Deviation 5.96128
Wound Age >=47 WeeksTotal Wound AreaWound Area on Last Study Visit8.80875 Squared centimitersStandard Deviation 7.73304
Secondary

Total Wound Volume

Mean and Standard Deviation of the group's total wound volume at day one and last treatment day. Wound volume was measured as Length x Width X Depth (when able to determine depth). This is to assess the change in volume, in order to assess wound progress towards closure.

Time frame: Initial measurement at day 1 and measurement at the subject's last visit at 12 weeks or sooner if the wound closed before then.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Wound Age Between 4 and 21 WeeksTotal Wound VolumeInitial Wound Volume9.561 cubic centimeterStandard Deviation 9.94704
Wound Age Between 4 and 21 WeeksTotal Wound VolumeWound Volume on Last Study Visit0.394 cubic centimeterStandard Deviation 0.78401
Wound Age >=47 WeeksTotal Wound VolumeInitial Wound Volume2.67475 cubic centimeterStandard Deviation 2.73782
Wound Age >=47 WeeksTotal Wound VolumeWound Volume on Last Study Visit2.086 cubic centimeterStandard Deviation 1.9324
Secondary

Wounds With Slough/Eschar Reduction on Visit 2 and Wounds With Slough/Eschar Reduction at Last Visit

Mean and Standard Deviation of the group's percent adherent and/or non-adherent slough present in the wound bed at day one and last treatment day. This is to assess the change in slough/eschar. This is to determine progression from contact to noncontact ultrasound therapy, as well as to determine progress of wound bed quality.

Time frame: Day 2 and measurement at the subject's last visit at 12 weeks or sooner if the wound closed before then.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Wound Age Between 4 and 21 WeeksWounds With Slough/Eschar Reduction on Visit 2 and Wounds With Slough/Eschar Reduction at Last VisitWounds w/ slough/eschar Reduction on visit 24 Wounds
Wound Age Between 4 and 21 WeeksWounds With Slough/Eschar Reduction on Visit 2 and Wounds With Slough/Eschar Reduction at Last VisitWounds w/ slough/eschar Reduction on last visit4 Wounds
Wound Age >=47 WeeksWounds With Slough/Eschar Reduction on Visit 2 and Wounds With Slough/Eschar Reduction at Last VisitWounds w/ slough/eschar Reduction on visit 28 Wounds
Wound Age >=47 WeeksWounds With Slough/Eschar Reduction on Visit 2 and Wounds With Slough/Eschar Reduction at Last VisitWounds w/ slough/eschar Reduction on last visit7 Wounds
Other Pre-specified

Wounds With Granulation Present on Visit 1 and Wounds With Granulation Present at Last Visit

Mean and Standard Deviation of the group's total percent of granulation tissue present in the wound bed at day one and last treatment day. This is to assess the change in granulation, in order to assess progress of wound bed quality.

Time frame: Initial measurement at day 1 and measurement at the subject's last visit at 12 weeks or sooner if the wound closed before then.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Wound Age Between 4 and 21 WeeksWounds With Granulation Present on Visit 1 and Wounds With Granulation Present at Last VisitInitial Granulation22.5 % GranulationStandard Deviation 17.07825
Wound Age Between 4 and 21 WeeksWounds With Granulation Present on Visit 1 and Wounds With Granulation Present at Last VisitGranulation on last visit100 % GranulationStandard Deviation 0
Wound Age >=47 WeeksWounds With Granulation Present on Visit 1 and Wounds With Granulation Present at Last VisitInitial Granulation21.75 % GranulationStandard Deviation 24.97284
Wound Age >=47 WeeksWounds With Granulation Present on Visit 1 and Wounds With Granulation Present at Last VisitGranulation on last visit55.125 % GranulationStandard Deviation 38.93745

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026