Skip to content

A Pharmacodynamic Study of a Personalized Strategy for P2Y12 Inhibition Versus Ticagrelor in Reducing Ischemic and Bleeding Risk

Reassessment of Anti-Platelet Therapy Using InDividualized Strategies - Modifying Acute CoroNary Syndrome Algorithms Based on Genetic and Demographic Evaluation: The RAPID-MANAGE Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02044146
Acronym
RAPID MANAGE
Enrollment
120
Registered
2014-01-23
Start date
2014-09-30
Completion date
2017-06-30
Last updated
2018-10-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Coronary Syndrome, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Brief summary

In patients with heart attacks, the treatment of choice is to restore blood flow with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (use of stents (metal meshes) to open blockages). After PCI, the standard drug treatment includes aspirin and clopidogrel. These medications block full function of the platelet cells, which are responsible for clotting. Despite their use, patients after PCI are at risk for heart attacks, sudden clotting of stents or death. A major contributor may be resistance to clopidogrel. New more potent drugs, which can overcome the resistance, are now available; however, they come with an increase chance of severe bleeding and costs. An ideal solution would be to identify at-risk patients and selectively treat them with more potent drugs, while lower-risk patients continue with clopidogrel. This type of strategy (personalized strategy) would decrease heart attacks and death (compared to clopidogrel), while also preventing bleeding complications (compared to treating all patients with the new drugs). Of resistant patients, many carry genes (inherited units) that prevent proper absorption of clopidogrel. Our group has developed and tested a new bedside genetic test, which identifies carriers of at-risk genes. However, this technique alone does not identify all at-risk patients. Consequently, we have now devised a novel tool, which combines genetics with patient characteristics to identify high-risk patients. The present study combines this new tool into a strategy for personalized treatment. Patients with heart attacks who undergo PCI will be randomly assigned to 1 of 3 strategies: a) new personalized strategy, b) clopidogrel strategy (previous standard drug) or c) ticagrelor strategy (stronger approved drug). The function of the platelet cells will be measured at 1 month to determine potential benefits. Evaluation of this new personalized strategy is important for improving patient outcomes after PCI. The hypothesis is that patients receiving a personalized strategy will have decrease risk for future heart attacks and bleeding.

Interventions

DRUGTicagrelor, Prasugrel, Clopidogrel

Sponsors

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients: age \>18 yrs, \< 75yrs -\> 60 kg ( since March 2015 age \>75 and \< 60 kg eligible - but prasugrel reduced to 5mg daily if randomized to personalized therapy arm) * NSTEMI undergoing PCI will be eligible

Exclusion criteria

\- Patients will be excluded if they have: i) a contra-indication for clopidogrel or prasugrel or ticagrelor (as per monograph), ii) have an intolerance to aspirin, iii) have absolute requirement for ticagrelor or prasugrel (e.g. stent thrombosis, allergic reaction to clopidogrel), iv) requirement for anti-coagulation treatment, v) a history of stroke, TIA or intracranial hemorrhage , vi) a platelet count \< 100,000/μl, vii) a known bleeding diathesis, viii) hematocrit \<30% or \>52%, ix) severe liver dysfunction, x) renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance \< 30ml/min), xi) adjuvant therapy with a glycoprotein IIbIIIa inhibitor.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Patients in Therapeutic Window1 monthThe primary endpoint is the proportion of patients outside of the therapeutic window in the personalized therapy (PN) arm compared to the ticagrelor (TG) arm at 1 month. The therapeutic window will be defined by platelet function values (VerifyNow P2Y12 assay - P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) ≤ 208 (correlated with decreased ischemic outcomes) AND PRU \>= 85 (correlated with decrease bleeding). This is a surrogate of NACE (net adverse clinical events)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
P2Y12 Reaction Unit (PRU)Baseline, Day 1, 1 monthchange in PRU from baseline, day 1 to 1 month in each of the groups
Bleeding1 month, 6 monthsthe incidence of bleeding (defined by TIMI minor and major bleeds) among groups
MACE1 month, 6 monthscombined clinical endpoint (MACE) including death, myocardial infarction(MI) or urgent target vessel revascularization (TVR)
Stent thrombosis1 month, 6 monthstent thrombosis (ARC definite/probable)

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cost1 month, 6 monthsEvaluate cost involved in each strategy
Genetic factors associated to outcomes1 month, 6 monthsExploratory analysis of other potential genetic variants to outcomes

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026