Skip to content

Context Effects in Exercise Therapy for Knee and/or Hip Pain

Effect of Physical Surroundings on Effects From Exercise as Treatment for Hip or Knee Pain: A Double-blind Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02043613
Acronym
CONEX
Enrollment
103
Registered
2014-01-23
Start date
2014-02-28
Completion date
2015-03-31
Last updated
2015-03-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Joint Pain, Knee Pain, Hip Pain, Osteoarthritis, Knee, Osteoarthritis, Hip

Keywords

Joint pain, Context effects, Placebo effect, Exercise treatment

Brief summary

The study is designed to investigate the effect of physical surroundings on the effect of exercise therapy for knee and hip pain.

Detailed description

Context effect have been shown to be influential in health-care settings, such as hospitals. This study investigates if context effects can be caused by the physical surroundings of exercise. The study is designed as a double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial. Patients with knee and/or hip pain with a duration of a least 3 months are included in the trial and randomly assigned to 3 groups. 1. Exercise in pre-existing, standard room 2. Exercise in contextually enhanced room. 3. Waiting list. The intervention consists markedly different between the two exercise rooms. The physical surroundings are described by factors such as acoustics, light source and intensity, decorations and air quality. The exercise program applied is based on a previously investigated neuromuscular exercise program, NEMEX. The same program is performed in both exercise rooms. Consequently, only the physical surroundings differ between intervention groups. Patients' global perceived effect is used as the primary outcome assessed at 8 weeks follow-up.

Interventions

OTHERContextually enhanced physical surroundings of exercise

Different physical surroundings of exercise may affects the patients differently and consequently influence the effect of exercise. The exercise rooms are different from each other on parameters such as source of lighting, acoustics, materials and decorations. The differences with the physical surroundings of exercise is the primary intervention for this study.

The neuromuscular exercise program is the same across the two exercise groups. Consequently, this intervention is not the primary intervention of this study. The exercise program is based on the previously reported NEMEX program designed for patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis, originally published by Ageberg et al, 2010 in BMCMusculoskeletal Disorders.

Sponsors

The Swedish Research Council
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
The Danish Rheumatism Association (funding)
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University of Southern Denmark
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
35 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age: 35 years or older * Self-report of knee and/or hip pain within the last 3 months. * Willing and able to attend exercise therapy at the University of Southern Denmark, Odense M twice weekly.

Exclusion criteria

* Co-morbidities or contraindication prohibiting to participation in exercise therapy. * Unable to fill-out questionnaires, or to speak, read or understand Danish. * Already participating in exercise therapy\*, having had surgery to the hip/knee within the last 3 months or on waiting list for joint surgery within the coming 6 months. (\*defined as supervised exercise program by physiotherapist, systematic strength training etc. with duration of 6 weeks or more)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patients' Global Perceived Effect8 weeksPatients indicate their perception of the global effect of the intervention on a 7 point likert scale ranging from substantially worse to no change to substantially improved. The scale is balanced around the 'no change' response with 3 steps in each direction, respectively deterioration or improvement.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline in KOOS (The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) or HOOS (The Hip Dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Score), respectivelyBaseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks
Change from baseline in The 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks
Change from baseline in Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scalebaseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks.A modified version of the Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale consisting of 11 items scoring patient reported self-efficacy
Patient satisfaction with physical surroundings8 weeksPatients are asked to indicate their level of satisfaction with different elements of the physical surroundings.

Other

MeasureTime frame
Change from baseline in muscle strength, MVC knee extensionbaseline, 8 weeks
Change from baseline in functional test: Single limb mini squatBaseline, 8 weeks
Change from baseline in aerobic capacity measured by a submaximal bicycle test by Aastrand & SaltinBaseline, 8 weeks
change from baseline in muscle strength, MVC, hip abductionbaseline, 8 weeks
Change from baseline in functional test: Maximal number of knee bendings pr. 30 sec.baseline, 8 weeks
Change from baseline in functional test: Number of chair stands per. 30 sec.baseline, 8 weeks
Change from baseline in functional test: Timed 40 m walking testbaseline, 8 weeks
Change from baseline in functional test: One leg hop for distanceBaseline, 8 weeks,

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 5, 2026