Acute Back Pain
Conditions
Brief summary
The purpose of this clinical study is to determine whether or not DW-1030 is not inferior to eperisone HCl in efficacy and safety.
Interventions
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Adult males/Females aged over 18 years * Patients with symptom of Acute skeletomuscle myospasm and Back pain * Patients with Pain VAS Value over 40 mm in Visit 2 * Subjects who voluntarily or legal guardian agreed with written consent
Exclusion criteria
* Patients with Back pain caused by spinal spondylosis, spinal stenosis, fractures, cancer, severe arthritis, osteoporosis, sciatica, infection * Muscular patients such as myositis, muscular atrophy disease, increased muscle tone, myasthenia gravis * Patients who had taken invasive procedures such as epidural injections or spinal stimulation to cure the back pain within 6 months from the screening point * Patients who had taken passive physical therapy or ionphoresis within 12 hours from the screening point * Patients with severe GI tract disorder, heart disease, hypertension * Patients who had taken NSAIDS within 24hours from the screening point
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Changes of Finger-to-Floor Distance(FFD) compared to baseline 7days after administration | 1, 3, 7 day |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Changes of 100mm Pain VAS | -3, 1, 3, 7 day |
| Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) | 1, 3, 7 day |
| Physician's Global Assessment | 7 day |
| The number of using rescue drugs and the total amount | 1, 3, 7 days |