Skip to content

Pneumatic Compression for Preventing Venous Thromboembolism

Prophylaxis of Thromboembolism in Critically Ill Patients Using Combined Intermittent Pneumatic Compression(IPC) and Pharmacologic Prophylaxis Versus Pharmacologic Prophylaxis Alone: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02040103
Acronym
PREVENT
Enrollment
2000
Registered
2014-01-20
Start date
2014-07-16
Completion date
2018-11-13
Last updated
2018-12-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Deep Venous Thrombosis

Keywords

Deep Vein Thrombosis, Pulmonary Embolism, Intermittent Pneumatic Compression, Pharmacologic DVT, Prophylaxis, Critically Ill Patients.

Brief summary

Patients admitted to the intensive care unit are at high risk of developing clots in the veins of the lower extremities. The objective of this study is to examine whether the use of a device that provides intermittent compression to the legs in addition to the use of low-dose blood thinners, provides an additional protection when compared to the use of blood thinners alone. Patients who are admitted to the intensive care unit are receiving low-dose blood thinners to prevent clots are candidates for this study. Patients who are enrolled will continue to receive blood thinners but some will additionally receive the leg compression. The additional use of leg compression may provide protection from clots. The main side effect is possible skin abrasions but this is usually mild. The study is sponsored by King Abdullah International Medical Research Center(KAIMRC) and King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology(KACST) and will be conducted in several hospitals in Saudi Arabia, Canada, Australia, Brazil and possibly other countries. The study started July 2014 and is to continue for 4 years.

Detailed description

There is no randomized controlled trial examining effect of the adjunct use of IPC with pharmacologic prophylaxis compared to pharmacologic prophylaxis (UFH, LMWH) alone in critically ill patients for VTE prevention.

Interventions

All IPC devices intended for DVT prophylaxis are acceptable in the study. Sequential devices (cuffs have several chambers) are preferred, but non-sequential (cuffs have single chambers) are acceptable.

Sponsors

King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
King Abdulaziz Hospital, Al Ahsa
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Unity Health Toronto
CollaboratorOTHER
King Fahad Medical City
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Assir Central Hospital
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Royal North Shore Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Mount Sinai Hospital, Canada
CollaboratorOTHER
Prince Sultan Military Medical City
CollaboratorOTHER
King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Gosford Hospital, Australia
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
St Vincent's Hospital - Sydney, Australia
CollaboratorOTHER
Medanta, The Medicity, India
CollaboratorOTHER
King Fahad Hospital of the University, Al Khobar
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
King George's Medical University, India
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
King Abdullah International Medical Research Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
14 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

A. Medical-Surgical ICU patients \>14 years old at participating ICU. ICUs that use other age cut-off for adult patients will adhere to their local standard (16 or 18 years) B. Weight \> 45kg C. Expected ICU LOS\> 72hrs D. Eligible for pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis with UFH and LMWH.

Exclusion criteria

A. Patient treated with IPC for \> 24 hours in this current ICU admission. B. Patient in the ICU\> 48 hours. C. Patient treated with pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis with medications other than UFH or LMWH. D. Inability or contraindication to applying IPC to both legs i.Burns in the lower extremities, lacerations, active skin infection, & ischemic limb in the legs at the site of IPC placement ii. Acute ischemia in the lower extremities iii. Amputated foot or leg on one or two sides iv. Compartment Syndrome v. Severe peripheral arterial disease vi. Vein ligation, gangrene, recent vein grafts, and draining incisions vii. Evidence of bone fracture in lower extremities E. Therapeutic dose of anticoagulation with UFH or LMWH F. Pregnancy G. Limitation of life support, life expectancy \< 7 days or palliative care H. Allergy to the sleeves material I. Patients with Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) Filter

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proximal deep vein thrombosis(DVT) diagnosed by compression ultrasound28 days from randomizationThe primary outcome is incident proximal leg DVT, defined as detected 3 or more days post-randomization and up to ICU discharge or day 28 post randomization

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pulmonary Embolismfrom the time of randomization to 90 daysPulmonary Embolism: will be followed up to ICU discharge or day 28 post randomization. ICU Mortality. Death in ICU during the same ICU admission. Hospital Mortality. Death in the hospital (in ICU or on ward) during the same hospital admission. (Hospital mortality will be censored at 1 year from the date of enrollment). 28-day Mortality: Death before or at day 28 of enrollment. 90-day Mortality: Death before or at day 90 of enrollment.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
ICU Length of stay and duration of mechanical ventilationNumber of days in ICU with an average expected duration of 10 days and number of days of mechanical ventillation with an expected average duration of 8 days.ICU Length of stay: Number of calendar days between admission and discharge from ICU. Duration of mechanical ventilation: Number of calendar days between start and end of mechanical ventilation.

Countries

Saudi Arabia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 12, 2026