Skip to content

Implementation of Women's Health Patient Aligned Care Teams

Implementation of VA Womens Health Patient Aligned Care Teams WH-PACTs

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02039856
Acronym
WH-PACT
Enrollment
3900
Registered
2014-01-20
Start date
2014-05-09
Completion date
2018-09-30
Last updated
2023-06-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patient-centered Medical Home Implementation

Keywords

Patient-centered medical homes, Primary care, Women's health, Veterans

Brief summary

VA has undertaken a major initiative to transform care through implementation of Patient Aligned Care Teams (PACTs). Based on the patient-centered medical home (PCMH) concept, PACT aims to improve access, continuity, coordination and comprehensiveness using team-based care that is patient-driven and patient-centered. However, how VA should adapt PACT to meet the needs of special populations, such as women Veterans, is yet to be worked out. The main goal of this study was to develop and test an evidence-based quality improvement (EBQI) approach to adapting and implementing PACT for women Veterans, incorporating comprehensive women's health care in gender-sensitive care environments, thereby accelerating achievement of PACT tenets for women Veterans and reducing persistent gender disparities in VA quality of care.

Detailed description

Women Veterans' numerical minority in VA healthcare settings has created logistical challenges to delivering gender-sensitive comprehensive services. These challenges only grew as more women Veterans enrolled in VA care. Access and quality lagged behind that of male Veterans, while gender sensitivity, including adequate attention to privacy/safety and awareness of women's military roles and experiences, were often lacking. On-site availability of gender-specific services had also not kept pace, with women Veterans more likely to be outsourced for gender-specific care than they were ten years previously. Further, while the proportion of VA facilities having women's health (WH) clinics had increased, prior research demonstrated that as many as 40% of them were not delivering comprehensive primary care services, instead focusing only on gender-specific exams. Lack of gender-sensitive, comprehensive care for women has also been associated with measurable decrements in women's ratings of VA access, continuity and coordination, as well as measures of technical quality. The investigators aimed to assess the effectiveness of evidence-based quality improvement (EBQI) methods for developing a WH PACT model using a cluster randomized controlled trial (cRCT) design (Aim #1); examine impacts of receipt of WH-PACT concordant care on women Veterans' outcomes (Aim #2); evaluate processes of EBQI-supported WH-PACT implementation (Aim #3); and develop implementation and evaluation tools for use in EBQI-supported WH-PACT model adaptation, implementation, sustainability and spread to additional VA facilities (Aim #4). EBQI is a systematic approach to developing a multi-level research-clinical partnership approach to engaging local organizational senior leaders and quality improvement teams in adapting and implementing new care models in the context of prior evidence, local practice context, and provider behavior change methods, with researchers providing technical support and practice facilitation. In a cluster randomized trial, the investigators evaluated WH-PACT model achievement using patient, provider and practice surveys. The investigators examined intermediate changes in provider, staff and team knowledge and attitudes. Using analyses of secondary administrative and performance data, the investigators also explored impacts of receipt of WH-PACT care on quality of chronic disease care and prevention, health status, and utilization. Using mixed methods, the investigators assessed pre-post EBQI practice context; documented WH-PACT implementation; and examined barriers/facilitators to EBQI-supported WH-PACT implementation through a combination of semi-structured interviews and formative progress narratives and administrative data review.

Interventions

OTHERMultilevel stakeholder engagement

Structured, in-person stakeholder panel meeting of VA network, VA medical center, and primary care and women's health leaders using modified Delphi panel techniques to come to consensus on a quality improvement (QI) roadmap within each participating VA network, followed by intermittent progress reporting and post-24 months in-person capstone stakeholder panel meetings

OTHERQuality improvement (QI) education/training

Initial in-person and ongoing virtual team training in QI principles, methods, and project proposal development and refinement

Research team provided technical review of and feedback on local QI project proposals, helped develop and/or recommend process/outcome measures, identified and shared relevant published literature (e.g., measures, interventions), and provided general technical support (e.g., how to analyze local data, how to conduct a local focus group)

OTHERFormative feedback

Research team provided aggregated all-site and local data from baseline patient and provider/staff surveys, 12-month patient surveys, and other data and findings to local teams for ongoing and new QI project idea development

OTHERExternal practice facilitation

Within and across site calls with local teams to review progress, identify needs, help solve problems, discuss current and new projects, as well as potential for spread

OTHERNational policy guidance

VA Handbooks on policy and practice for PACT implementation guidance and on delivery of comprehensive women's health services disseminated to all VA facilities

Sponsors

University of California, Los Angeles
CollaboratorOTHER
RAND
CollaboratorOTHER
VA Office of Research and Development
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Cluster randomized controlled trial (cRCT) among 12 VAMCs with unbalanced allocation (2:1) blocked on VA network (Veterans Integrated Service Network or VISN)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Facility inclusion criteria: * VA medical center (VAMC) * Located in a VISN that has 3 or more VAMCs * Membership in the Women's Health Practice Based Research Network (PBRN) Key Stakeholder (interviews) inclusion criteria: * VISN and VAMC leaders, VAMC primary care/PACT directors, VAMC women's health medical directors, Women Veteran Program Managers (VISN and VAMC), VISN representatives in mental health, health information technology/informatics, quality improvement/system redesign, at least one Nurse Executive (VISN or VAMC) * Intervention and control VAMCs Provider (surveys and interviews) inclusion criteria: * Primary care providers (medical doctor \[MD\], doctor of osteopathy \[DO\], nurse practitioner \[NP\], physician assistant \[PA\]) who have seen 1+ women Veterans in the past year * Teamlet primary care provider interviews (MD, DO, NP, PA) at intervention VAMCs * Surveys of primary care providers (MD, DO, NP, PA) at intervention and control VAMCs * Surveys of larger primary care/PACT team members (e.g., clinical pharmacists, health coaches) Staff (surveys and interviews) inclusion criteria: * Primary care/PACT clinical staff (non-providers) in primary care/PACT teams/teamlets that have seen 1+ women Veterans in the past year * Teamlet member interviews at Intervention VAMCs Patient inclusion criteria: \- Women Veterans seen in participating VAMCs with 3+ primary care visits in general primary care and/or women's health clinics in the past year

Exclusion criteria

Facility

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
WH-PACT AchievementBaseline to 24-monthThe Women's Health Patient-Aligned Care Team achievement, based on four patient-reported measures of access to care, patient-provider communication, comprehensiveness of care, and gender-appropriateness of care. The WH-PACT achievement is an aggregate score from -4 to +4, with the higher score meaning better PACT achievement.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Team FunctioningBaseline to 24-monthPerceived team functioning of primary care and women's health providers and staff, measured based on responses to 7 survey items. The team functioning score ranged from 1 to 5 , with the higher score indicating better team functioning.
Providers and Staff Burnout24-monthBurnout was measured using one item: How often does the following statement apply to you: I feel burned out from my work with options for 1.Never, 2. A few times a year, 3. Every month, 4. A few times a month, 5. Every week, 6. A few times a week, 7. Every day. We recoded the responses into a binary value: never/less than a few times a month (1-4) and every week-to-everyday (5-7).
Patient VA Primary Care Visits Per YearBaseline to 24monthAverage number of visits to VA primary care per year
Providers' and Staff Gender SensitivityBaseline to 24-monthGender sensitivity score based on 10 survey items related to providers' and staff's sensitivity towards women Veterans during patient care. The score ranged from 1 to 5 with the higher score reflecting greater gender sensitivity toward women Veterans.
Patient VA HospitalizationBaseline to 24-monthAverage number of patient hospitalization for any cause in a year
Patient Emergency Room Visitsbaseline to 24-monthAverage number of patient emergency room visits for any cause in a year
Patient VA Women's Health Care Visits Per YearBaseline to 24monthAverage number of patient visits to VA women's health care per year

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Random samples of women Veteran clinic users (patient surveys) and census of each VAMC's primary care and women's health providers and staff in PACT and WH-PACT (web surveys) at 12 participating VAMCs recruited through the WH Practice Based Research Network

Participants by arm

ArmCount
EBQI-Supported WH-PACT Implementation
Evidence-based Quality Improvement (EBQI) is a structured research-clinical partnership approach to facilitating implementation of new care models, including multilevel stakeholder engagement, quality improvement (QI) education/training, technical support, formative feedback, external practice facilitation, and national policy guidance.
1,147
Routine WH-PACT Implementation
VA Handbooks on policy and practice for PACT implementation guidance and on delivery of comprehensive women's health services disseminated to all VA facilities
536
Total1,683

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath53
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up388206
Overall StudyPartial survey completion6126
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1,573618

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEBQI-Supported WH-PACT ImplementationRoutine WH-PACT ImplementationTotal
Age, Continuous
Patients
53.39 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.99
51.54 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.76
52.80 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.94
Age, Customized
20-29 years
7 Participants3 Participants10 Participants
Age, Customized
30-39 years
36 Participants19 Participants55 Participants
Age, Customized
40-49 years
48 Participants20 Participants68 Participants
Age, Customized
50-59 years
65 Participants30 Participants95 Participants
Age, Customized
60+ years
23 Participants10 Participants33 Participants
Age, Customized
missing
15 Participants12 Participants27 Participants
Are you currently working in WH-PACT?
not sure
11 Participants5 Participants16 Participants
Are you currently working in WH-PACT?
PACTs
97 Participants58 Participants155 Participants
Are you currently working in WH-PACT?
unkown/not reported
2 Participants4 Participants6 Participants
Are you currently working in WH-PACT?
WH-PACTs
84 Participants27 Participants111 Participants
Education
College degree
355 Participants176 Participants531 Participants
Education
Less than college
180 Participants72 Participants252 Participants
Education
missing
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Education
Some college
416 Participants193 Participants609 Participants
Employment
Employed
356 Participants193 Participants549 Participants
Employment
missing
3 Participants5 Participants8 Participants
Employment
Not in labor force
330 Participants125 Participants455 Participants
Employment
Not in labor force due to disability
220 Participants90 Participants310 Participants
Employment
un-employed
44 Participants29 Participants73 Participants
Full-time VA employee
Full-time
178 Participants89 Participants267 Participants
Full-time VA employee
Missing
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Full-time VA employee
Part-time
15 Participants5 Participants20 Participants
How often do you see or care for women patients in the clinic?
1-2 times per month
31 Participants7 Participants38 Participants
How often do you see or care for women patients in the clinic?
1-2 times per week
33 Participants8 Participants41 Participants
How often do you see or care for women patients in the clinic?
almost everyday or every day
40 Participants12 Participants52 Participants
How often do you see or care for women patients in the clinic?
Less than once per month
57 Participants41 Participants98 Participants
How often do you see or care for women patients in the clinic?
Missing/not reported
2 Participants5 Participants7 Participants
How often do you see or care for women patients in the clinic?
Never
11 Participants10 Participants21 Participants
How often do you see or care for women patients in the clinic?
several times each week
20 Participants11 Participants31 Participants
Marital status
Married/civil union/ significant other
371 Participants159 Participants530 Participants
Marital status
Missing
9 Participants6 Participants15 Participants
Marital status
Single/windowed/divorced/seperated
573 Participants277 Participants850 Participants
Military Sexual Trauma (MST)
Missing
16 Participants9 Participants25 Participants
Military Sexual Trauma (MST)
MST negative
362 Participants167 Participants529 Participants
Military Sexual Trauma (MST)
MST positive
575 Participants266 Participants841 Participants
Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)
Missing
11 Participants4 Participants15 Participants
Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)
PTSD negative
578 Participants244 Participants822 Participants
Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)
PTSD positive
364 Participants194 Participants558 Participants
Proportion of time interacting with patients
1%-24% of my total VA time
16 Participants8 Participants24 Participants
Proportion of time interacting with patients
25%-49% of my total VA time
19 Participants8 Participants27 Participants
Proportion of time interacting with patients
50%-75% of my total VA time
35 Participants18 Participants53 Participants
Proportion of time interacting with patients
>75% of my total VA time
124 Participants60 Participants184 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
4 Participants0 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
7 Participants9 Participants10 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
190 Participants11 Participants36 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants4 Participants70 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
More than one race
0 Participants1 Participants123 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown or Not Reported
10 Participants8 Participants36 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
140 Participants225 Participants195 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
953 Participants72 Participants1395 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
44 Participants0 Participants66 Participants
Stranger harassment from male veterans
Always
29 Participants13 Participants42 Participants
Stranger harassment from male veterans
Missing
7 Participants1 Participants8 Participants
Stranger harassment from male veterans
Never
737 Participants324 Participants1061 Participants
Stranger harassment from male veterans
Sometimes
144 Participants90 Participants234 Participants
Stranger harassment from male veterans
Usually
36 Participants14 Participants50 Participants
VA care utilization
VA and non-VA
345 Participants183 Participants528 Participants
VA care utilization
VA-only
608 Participants259 Participants867 Participants
Years of service at VA14.26 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.77
14.75 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.64
14.42 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
5 / 2,7203 / 1,180
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 2,7200 / 1,180
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 2,7200 / 1,180

Outcome results

Primary

WH-PACT Achievement

The Women's Health Patient-Aligned Care Team achievement, based on four patient-reported measures of access to care, patient-provider communication, comprehensiveness of care, and gender-appropriateness of care. The WH-PACT achievement is an aggregate score from -4 to +4, with the higher score meaning better PACT achievement.

Time frame: Baseline to 24-month

Population: The analysis included the patients who had completed the 24-month survey. One patient in the EBQI arm had missing data for outcome measure and was excluded from the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
EBQI-Supported WH-PACT ImplementationWH-PACT AchievementBaseline+375 Participants
EBQI-Supported WH-PACT ImplementationWH-PACT AchievementBaseline-430 Participants
EBQI-Supported WH-PACT ImplementationWH-PACT AchievementBaseline-349 Participants
EBQI-Supported WH-PACT ImplementationWH-PACT AchievementBaseline-251 Participants
EBQI-Supported WH-PACT ImplementationWH-PACT AchievementBaseline-149 Participants
EBQI-Supported WH-PACT ImplementationWH-PACT AchievementBaseline059 Participants
EBQI-Supported WH-PACT ImplementationWH-PACT AchievementBaseline+173 Participants
EBQI-Supported WH-PACT ImplementationWH-PACT AchievementBaseline+279 Participants
EBQI-Supported WH-PACT ImplementationWH-PACT AchievementBaseline+453 Participants
EBQI-Supported WH-PACT ImplementationWH-PACT Achievement24 month-434 Participants
EBQI-Supported WH-PACT ImplementationWH-PACT Achievement24 month-340 Participants
EBQI-Supported WH-PACT ImplementationWH-PACT Achievement24 month-235 Participants
EBQI-Supported WH-PACT ImplementationWH-PACT Achievement24 month-141 Participants
EBQI-Supported WH-PACT ImplementationWH-PACT Achievement24 month057 Participants
EBQI-Supported WH-PACT ImplementationWH-PACT Achievement24 month+172 Participants
EBQI-Supported WH-PACT ImplementationWH-PACT Achievement24 month+293 Participants
EBQI-Supported WH-PACT ImplementationWH-PACT Achievement24 month+383 Participants
EBQI-Supported WH-PACT ImplementationWH-PACT Achievement24 month+463 Participants
Routine WH-PACT ImplementationWH-PACT Achievement24 month020 Participants
Routine WH-PACT ImplementationWH-PACT AchievementBaseline+227 Participants
Routine WH-PACT ImplementationWH-PACT Achievement24 month-417 Participants
Routine WH-PACT ImplementationWH-PACT AchievementBaseline-423 Participants
Routine WH-PACT ImplementationWH-PACT Achievement24 month+429 Participants
Routine WH-PACT ImplementationWH-PACT AchievementBaseline-320 Participants
Routine WH-PACT ImplementationWH-PACT Achievement24 month-327 Participants
Routine WH-PACT ImplementationWH-PACT AchievementBaseline-226 Participants
Routine WH-PACT ImplementationWH-PACT Achievement24 month+124 Participants
Routine WH-PACT ImplementationWH-PACT AchievementBaseline-124 Participants
Routine WH-PACT ImplementationWH-PACT Achievement24 month-215 Participants
Routine WH-PACT ImplementationWH-PACT AchievementBaseline023 Participants
Routine WH-PACT ImplementationWH-PACT Achievement24 month+335 Participants
Routine WH-PACT ImplementationWH-PACT AchievementBaseline+131 Participants
Routine WH-PACT ImplementationWH-PACT Achievement24 month-121 Participants
Routine WH-PACT ImplementationWH-PACT AchievementBaseline+328 Participants
Routine WH-PACT ImplementationWH-PACT Achievement24 month+234 Participants
Routine WH-PACT ImplementationWH-PACT AchievementBaseline+420 Participants
Comparison: Change in the odds of achieving a higher WH-PACT element.p-value: 0.63795% CI: [0.627, 1.33]difference-in-differences analysis
Secondary

Patient Emergency Room Visits

Average number of patient emergency room visits for any cause in a year

Time frame: baseline to 24-month

Population: Patients only. One patient in the EBQI arm had missing outcome information and was excluded from the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EBQI-Supported WH-PACT ImplementationPatient Emergency Room VisitsBaseline0.90 Average visits per year for all patientsStandard Deviation 1.89
EBQI-Supported WH-PACT ImplementationPatient Emergency Room Visits24-month0.78 Average visits per year for all patientsStandard Deviation 1.5
Routine WH-PACT ImplementationPatient Emergency Room VisitsBaseline0.72 Average visits per year for all patientsStandard Deviation 1.31
Routine WH-PACT ImplementationPatient Emergency Room Visits24-month0.55 Average visits per year for all patientsStandard Deviation 1.05
Comparison: Change in number of emergency room visits for any cause between EBQI and control over timep-value: 0.88895% CI: [-0.265, 0.306]Regression, Linear
Secondary

Patient VA Hospitalization

Average number of patient hospitalization for any cause in a year

Time frame: Baseline to 24-month

Population: Patients only. One patient in the EBQI arm had missing outcome information and was excluded from the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EBQI-Supported WH-PACT ImplementationPatient VA HospitalizationBaseline0.26 Average visits per year for all patientsStandard Deviation 0.82
EBQI-Supported WH-PACT ImplementationPatient VA Hospitalization24-month0.17 Average visits per year for all patientsStandard Deviation 0.6
Routine WH-PACT ImplementationPatient VA HospitalizationBaseline0.19 Average visits per year for all patientsStandard Deviation 0.63
Routine WH-PACT ImplementationPatient VA Hospitalization24-month0.15 Average visits per year for all patientsStandard Deviation 0.41
Comparison: Change in number of patient hospitalization for any cause between EBQI and control over timep-value: 0.79495% CI: [-0.15, 0.12]Regression, Linear
Secondary

Patient VA Primary Care Visits Per Year

Average number of visits to VA primary care per year

Time frame: Baseline to 24month

Population: Patients only. One patient in the EBQI arm had missing outcome information and was excluded from the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EBQI-Supported WH-PACT ImplementationPatient VA Primary Care Visits Per YearBaseline6.96 average visits per year for all patientsStandard Deviation 5.57
EBQI-Supported WH-PACT ImplementationPatient VA Primary Care Visits Per Year24month6.78 average visits per year for all patientsStandard Deviation 7.21
Routine WH-PACT ImplementationPatient VA Primary Care Visits Per Year24month5.16 average visits per year for all patientsStandard Deviation 5.9
Routine WH-PACT ImplementationPatient VA Primary Care Visits Per YearBaseline6.46 average visits per year for all patientsStandard Deviation 5.14
Comparison: Change in number of patient primary care visits between EBQI and control over timep-value: 0.00895% CI: [0.14, 2.36]Regression, Linear
Secondary

Patient VA Women's Health Care Visits Per Year

Average number of patient visits to VA women's health care per year

Time frame: Baseline to 24month

Population: Patients only. One patient in the EBQI arm had missing outcome information and was excluded from the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EBQI-Supported WH-PACT ImplementationPatient VA Women's Health Care Visits Per YearBaseline4.05 Average visits per year for all patientsStandard Deviation 4.41
EBQI-Supported WH-PACT ImplementationPatient VA Women's Health Care Visits Per Year24month4.23 Average visits per year for all patientsStandard Deviation 6.23
Routine WH-PACT ImplementationPatient VA Women's Health Care Visits Per YearBaseline4.63 Average visits per year for all patientsStandard Deviation 3.74
Routine WH-PACT ImplementationPatient VA Women's Health Care Visits Per Year24month3.24 Average visits per year for all patientsStandard Deviation 3.69
Comparison: Change in number of patient visits to women's health care between EBQI and control over timep-value: 095% CI: [0.88, 2.51]Regression, Linear
Secondary

Providers and Staff Burnout

Burnout was measured using one item: How often does the following statement apply to you: I feel burned out from my work with options for 1.Never, 2. A few times a year, 3. Every month, 4. A few times a month, 5. Every week, 6. A few times a week, 7. Every day. We recoded the responses into a binary value: never/less than a few times a month (1-4) and every week-to-everyday (5-7).

Time frame: 24-month

Population: Primary care and women's health providers and staff. The analysis was based on cases with non-missing burnout data. There were 30 missing cases in the EBQI arm and 10 in the control arm.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
EBQI-Supported WH-PACT ImplementationProviders and Staff Burnoutnver/less than a few times a month (1-4)112 Participants
EBQI-Supported WH-PACT ImplementationProviders and Staff Burnouteveryweek to everyday (5-7)32 Participants
Routine WH-PACT ImplementationProviders and Staff Burnoutnver/less than a few times a month (1-4)72 Participants
Routine WH-PACT ImplementationProviders and Staff Burnouteveryweek to everyday (5-7)23 Participants
p-value: 0.05895% CI: [0.13, 1.04]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Providers' and Staff Gender Sensitivity

Gender sensitivity score based on 10 survey items related to providers' and staff's sensitivity towards women Veterans during patient care. The score ranged from 1 to 5 with the higher score reflecting greater gender sensitivity toward women Veterans.

Time frame: Baseline to 24-month

Population: Primary care and women's health providers and staff. The analysis was based on cases with non-missing outcome data. There were 28 missing cases in the EBQI arm and 9 missing in the control arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EBQI-Supported WH-PACT ImplementationProviders' and Staff Gender SensitivityBaseline4.04 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.59
EBQI-Supported WH-PACT ImplementationProviders' and Staff Gender Sensitivity24-month4.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.48
Routine WH-PACT ImplementationProviders' and Staff Gender SensitivityBaseline4.15 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.57
Routine WH-PACT ImplementationProviders' and Staff Gender Sensitivity24-month4.14 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.62
Comparison: Change in gender sensitivity score between EBQI and control over timep-value: 0.00695% CI: [0.1, 0.57]Regression, Linear
Secondary

Team Functioning

Perceived team functioning of primary care and women's health providers and staff, measured based on responses to 7 survey items. The team functioning score ranged from 1 to 5 , with the higher score indicating better team functioning.

Time frame: Baseline to 24-month

Population: Primary care and women's health providers and staff. The analysis was based on cases with non-missing outcome data. There are 80 missing cases in the EBQI arm and 74 in the control arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EBQI-Supported WH-PACT ImplementationTeam FunctioningBaseline3.70 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.84
EBQI-Supported WH-PACT ImplementationTeam Functioning24 month3.84 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.75
Routine WH-PACT ImplementationTeam FunctioningBaseline4.10 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
Routine WH-PACT ImplementationTeam Functioning24 month3.98 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.77
Comparison: Change in team functioning score between EBQI and control over time.p-value: 0.05595% CI: [-0.01, 0.87]Regression, Linear

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 12, 2026