Skip to content

Patient Centered Cloud-based Electronic System: Ambient Warning and Response Evaluation (ProCCESs AWARE)

Patient Centered Cloud-based Electronic System: Ambient Warning and Response Evaluation (ProCCESs AWARE)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02039297
Acronym
AWARE
Enrollment
7813
Registered
2014-01-17
Start date
2013-03-31
Completion date
2017-06-30
Last updated
2017-10-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bleeding, Coma, Critical Illness, Respiratory Failure, Sepsis, Shock, Trauma

Keywords

AWARE, Checklist, ICU, Outcome, Adults

Brief summary

In this multicenter project, we will introduce AWARE (electronic interface) Using a cloud-based technology . The goal of this project is to improve compliance with best practice through the use of a new acute care interface with built-in tools for error prevention, practice surveillance and reporting (ProCCESs AWARE - Patient Centered Cloud-based Electronic System: Ambient Warning and Response Evaluation).The goal of this project is to develop and test a novel acute care interface with built-in tools for error prevention, practice surveillance, decision support and reporting (ProCCESs AWARE - Patient Centered Cloud-based Electronic System: Ambient Warning and Response Evaluation). In preliminary studies, these novel informatics supports built on an advanced understanding of cognitive and organizational ergonomics, have significantly decreased the cognitive load of bedside providers and reduced medical errors. Using a cloud-based technology, AWARE will be uniformly available on either mobile or fixed computing devices and applied in a standardized manner in medical and surgical ICUs of five geographically diverse acute care hospitals predominantly serving Medicare and Medicaid patients. The impact of ProCCESs AWARE on processes of care and outcomes in study ICUs; expected to enroll more than 10,000 critically ill patients during the study period.

Interventions

OTHERPatient Centered Cloud-based Electronic System: Ambient Warning and Response Evaluation

Computer aided checklist and rounding tool implemented in the Intensive care unit environment

Sponsors

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
CollaboratorFED
Mayo Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

For the Primary Objective, all critically ill adult patient admitted to an ICU participating in the study will be eligible.

Exclusion criteria

For the Primary Objective, all children younger than 18years of age will be excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adherence to process of careParticipants will be followed for the duration of ICU stay, an expected average of 3 daysAdherence to best practice for daily intensive care rounds. Appropriate shock resuscitation Appropriate sepsis treatment Appropriate mechanical ventilation Appropriate peptic ulcer, deep vein thrombosis and infectious disease prophylaxis etc.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient outcomesHospital length of stay - 2 weeksWe will include, ICU length of stay, Hospital length of stay, ICU free days, standardized mortality ratio in ICU and Hospital, Ventilator free days.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cost of patient care in ICU and HospitalHospital length of stay - 2 weeksCost of patient care in ICU and Hospital derived from medicare data

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026