Skip to content

Centralised Anesthesic Monitoring in the Surgery of the Ocular Anterior Segment: Non Inferiority Study

Centralised Anesthesic Monitoring in the Surgery of the Ocular Anterior Segment: Non Inferiority Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02037009
Acronym
SACHS
Enrollment
900
Registered
2014-01-15
Start date
2013-11-30
Completion date
2014-08-31
Last updated
2026-01-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ambulatory Surgical Procedures, Ocular Anterior Segment Surgery

Brief summary

In France, cataract surgery is the most frequent surgical procedure, performed with local anesthesia and most often very light techniques using eye-drops. Technical improvements of surgical and anesthesic procedures have led many countries to implement alternative surveillance procedures. In France, it is mandatory that the persons in charge of anesthetic surveillance (doctors or nurses) should be qualified in anesthesia. In this study, the investigators aim to assess the feasibility and safety of a centralised monitoring station outside of the operating rooms, as an alternative to the presence of 1 anesthetic nurse in each operating room.

Detailed description

In their hospital, the investigators will study the following alternatives for the anesthetic surveillance of the 3 operating rooms where surgery of the ocular anterior segment is performed: 1) the usual procedure, with the presence of 3 anesthetic nurses (1 in each operating room) and 2) a new organization with an anesthetic nurse checking a centralised monitoring station and a back-up anesthetic nurse ready to intervene inside the 3 operating rooms whenever needed. The 2 procedures will be successively implemented during 3 to 4 sequences, until the number of surgical procedures statistically required have been studied. The investigators aim to demonstrate that the centralised monitored surveillance does not put the patients at risk more often than the current surveillance procedure.

Interventions

OTHERHealth care organization (anesthetic surveillance)

Sponsors

Ministry of Health, France
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* adult patient scheduled for ocular anterior segment surgery (cataract, glaucoma, pterygium) with local or topic anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

* patient refusing to participate in the study or without health insurance

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Anesthetic potential impact on surgery conditionsduring surgical procedureIncidence rate of at least 1 of the following events, during surgery: * blood pressure \> 200 mmHg on 2 consecutive measures (automatic measure every 3 minutes) * cardiac frequency \< 45/min for at least 1 mn * SaO2 \<85% for at least 1 mn * poor operating conditions (rated ≤ 7 by the surgeon, on a numeric scale from 0 to 10=excellent conditions). Assessment at the exit of operating room.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
patient satisfactionwithin 10 minutes after surgeryauto-assessment of patient satisfaction using a 0 to 10 (fully satisfied) scale
patient agitationwithin 10 minutes after surgeryassessed by the surgeon using a 0 to 10 (very agitated) scale
operating conditionswithin 10 minutes after surgeryauto-assessment by the surgeon of the operating conditions, on a 0 to 10 (excellent conditions) scale and on a 0 to 10 (completely safe) scale
working conditionsat the end of a working dayauto-assessment of working conditions by the anesthetic nurses, on a 0 to 10 (excellent) scale and on a 0 to 10 (completely safe) scale
interventions of the back-up anesthetic nurseduring surgical proceduremean number of interventions of the back-up anesthetic nurse during the procedures proportion of surgical procedures requiring at least one intervention of the nurse
patient pre-surgical stressbaselineauto-assessment of stress level using a 0 to 10 (maximum stress) scale
pain during surgical procedurewithin 10 minutes after surgeryretrospective auto-assessment of patient pain using a 0 to 10 (maximum pain) scale
incidence rate of each of the events included in the primary outcomeduring surgical procedureincidence rate of blood pressure \> 200 mmHg on 2 consecutive measures (automatic measure every 3 minutes) incidence rate of cardiac frequency \< 45/min for at least 1 mn incidence rate of SaO2 \<85% for at least 1 mn incidence rate of poor operating conditions (rated \< 7 by the surgeon, on a numeric scale from 0 to 10 (excellent conditions)

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
revision surgery24 hours after baselineincidence rate of revision surgery within 24 hours
patient baseline painbaselineauto-assessment of patient pain before surgery on a 0 to 10 (maximum pain) scale
efficiency of the centralised monitoring of anesthesic surveillanceduring surgical procedureassessment of costs

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026