Skip to content

Multivariate Assessment of the IUB Intrauterine Device Compared With a T380A IUD

A Prospective, Randomized, Single Blind, Two Arms Controlled Study to Confirm the Safety and Verify Performance of the IUB™ SCu300A Intrauterine Device in Comparison to TCu380 IUD Intra-uterine Contraceptive Device

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02036177
Enrollment
366
Registered
2014-01-14
Start date
2014-06-12
Completion date
2017-07-15
Last updated
2018-07-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

To Assess the Safety, Effectiveness and User Experience of the Scu 300A IUB

Keywords

IUB

Brief summary

The novel SCu300A IUB™ (hereafter IUB™) will be evaluated for safety and effectiveness in comparison with a market approved standard T shaped IUD containing 380sq.mm. of copper. The Primary Endpoints for comparison are based on the objective and subjective parameters. The objective parameters are pregnancy rate, perforation, expulsion and mal -position rates, changes in the endometrial thickness, rate of complications such as infection and anemia and discontinuation rates after 2 years. The subjective parameters including Quality of Life (QoL) are: pain during insertion, menstrual characteristics and pain, bleeding in correlation to the bleeding pattern prior to insertion. The Secondary Endpoints are physician opinion (ease of use in insertion and removal) and subject satisfaction.

Interventions

DEVICESCu300A IUB intrauterine device

Spherical copper IUD

DEVICET380A IUD

T-shaped copper IUD

Sponsors

Ocon Medical Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Adult females aged 18-45 * Free and willing to fully comply with treatment process * Healthy women seeking LARC * Married or in a steady relationship (at least 1 year) * Blood hemoglobin \>11.5gr/dL * Signed informed consent form * If took COCP at least had one cycle after use of OC

Exclusion criteria

* Use IUB/IUD as an emergency contraception * A previously placed IUD that has not been removed * Pregnancy or suspicion of pregnancy * Immediately post-abortion or post-partum - unless had at least one free cycle * Use of other contraception method (condom for either male or female, oral contraceptives, diaphragms, spermicides, hormonal patches, injections or ring, cervical cap) * History of pelvic inflammatory disease, recent or remote. * Postpartum endometritis or postabortal endometritis in the past 3 month * Mucupurulent cervicitis * Endometrial thickness more than 12 mm on insertion date * Known anemia (except thalassemia, sickle cell, chronic anemia) * Severe Mennorrhagia or severe Dysmenorrhea * History of previous IUD complications * Dysfunctional uterine bleeding * Undiagnosed uterine bleeding * Malignancy or suspected malignant disease of female inner or outer genitalia * Distortions of the uterine cavity by uterine fibroids or known anatomical abnormalities * Known intolerance or allergy to nitinol or copper and/or copper IUDs - Wilson's disease. * Medication that may interfere with the subject's ability to complete the protocol * Use of injectable contraception in the previous year * Any other significant disease or condition that could interfere with the subject's ability to complete the protocol * A history of alcohol or drug abuse * Known infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C * Pregnancy or pregnancy planned during the year * Enrollment (less than 30 days after completing another study) in or planned to be enrolled in another study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pregnancy rate24 months
Safety issues24 monthsPerforations, expulsions, mal-position etc
Discontinuation rate24 months
Patient experience24 monthsRecording of menstrual cramping, pain and bleeding irregularities during the trial period

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Physician opinion24 monthsEase of use in insertion and removal

Countries

Bulgaria, Romania

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026