Skip to content

Abdominal Functional Electrical Stimulation to Reduce Hyperinflation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients

Abdominal Functional Electrical Stimulation to Reduce Hyperinflation in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Feasibility Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02035228
Enrollment
7
Registered
2014-01-14
Start date
2013-03-31
Completion date
2014-01-31
Last updated
2018-08-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Keywords

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Lung Hyperinflation, Abdominal Muscle, Functional Electrical Stimulation

Brief summary

This is an early feasibility study to investigate whether transcutaneous electrical stimulation applied to the abdominal wall muscles synchronous with voluntary exhalation can be used to support ventilation and affect hyperinflation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. As part of this study, the effect of a range of stimulation intensities and stimulation timing profiles will be explored.

Interventions

DEVICEAbdominal Stimulation - low / early

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation applied to the abdominal wall muscles in synchronous with volitional exhalation. Stimulation is applied at low stimulation current for the first half of exhalation

DEVICEAbdominal stimulation - low/late

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation applied to the abdominal wall muscles in synchronous with volitional exhalation. Stimulation is applied at low stimulation current for the second half of exhalation

DEVICEAbdominal Stimulation - low/full

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation applied to the abdominal wall muscles in synchronous with volitional exhalation. Stimulation is applied at low stimulation current throughout exhalation

DEVICEAbdominal stimulation - med/early

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation applied to the abdominal wall muscles in synchronous with volitional exhalation. Stimulation is applied at medium stimulation current for the first half of exhalation

DEVICEAbdominal stimulation - med/late

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation applied to the abdominal wall muscles in synchronous with volitional exhalation. Stimulation is applied at medium stimulation current for the second half of exhalation

DEVICEAbdominal Stimulation - med/full

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation applied to the abdominal wall muscles in synchronous with volitional exhalation. Stimulation is applied at medium stimulation current throughout exhalation

DEVICEAbdominal Stimulation - high/early

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation applied to the abdominal wall muscles in synchronous with volitional exhalation. Stimulation is applied at high stimulation current for the first half of exhalation

DEVICEAbdominal Stimulation - high/late

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation applied to the abdominal wall muscles in synchronous with volitional exhalation. Stimulation is applied at hig stimulation current for the second half of exhalation

DEVICEAbdominal Stimulation - high/full

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation applied to the abdominal wall muscles in synchronous with volitional exhalation. Stimulation is applied at high stimulation current throughout exhalation

Sponsors

Liberate Medical
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC ratio of less than 0.7 and post-bronchodilator FEV1 between 30 and 80 % predicted. * Current or former smokers with at least a 20 pack year smoking history * Over the age of forty

Exclusion criteria

* Female subjects who are pregnant * Subjects unable to give informed consent * Subjects unable to perform required activities of the study (e.g. Six minute walk test) * Subjects with an implanted electronic device (e.g. a cardiac pacemaker) * Subjects who have had a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation within 30 days prior to enrollment * Considerable arthritic changes that limit exertion * Patients on oral prednisone * Patients with a hernia * Patients with a history of pneumothorax within the last 5 years * History of epilepsy * History of Abnormal electrocardiogram suggestive of cardiac disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in inspiratory capacity during 2 minutes of resting breathing when patients were seated2 minutesInspiratory Capacity was measured before and after two minute periods of volitional and abdominal stimulation assisted breathing. The two minute trials of breathing were measured while patients were seated.
Change in inspiratory capacity during a 6 minute step test6 minutes

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Average peak expiratory flow rate during 2 minutes of resting breathing while seated2 minutes
Average tidal volume during 2 minutes of resting breathing while seated2 minutes
Change in dyspnea measured using the modified Borg dyspnea scale during a 6 minute step test6 minutes
Average breathing rate during two minutes of resting breathing while seated2 minutes
Average minute ventilation during 2 minutes of resting breathing while seated2 minutes

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026