Skip to content

Comparison of the Effectiveness of 2 Manual Therapies on Functional Outcome in Sub-acute and Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain

Comparison of the Effectiveness of 2 Manual Therapies on Functional Outcome in Sub-acute and Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain at 3 Months : a Randomised Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02034864
Acronym
LC OSTEO
Enrollment
400
Registered
2014-01-14
Start date
2014-02-17
Completion date
2017-10-23
Last updated
2025-09-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Subacute and Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain

Keywords

low back pain, manual therapy, randomized controlled trial

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a standardised osteopathic manipulative treatment is more effective than a placebo of osteopathic manipulative treatment, in sub-acute and chronic non-specific low back pain on functional recovery at 3 months.

Detailed description

Sub-acute (4-12-week duration) and chronic (more than 3-month duration) non-specific low back pain (LBP) is frequent, disabling and costly. The effectiveness of usual treatments (including pain killers, anti-inflammatory drugs, spinal injections, physiotherapy, spinal traction, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, etc) may be not sufficient, and many patients resort to alternative therapies. Manipulative treatments represent en emerging therapy in this area, although studies assessing their effectiveness are limited and often biased. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of two manual therapies on improving functional recovery in sub-acute and chronic non-specific low back pain at 3 months. A standardised osteopathic manipulative treatment is compare to a placebo of osteopathic manipulative treatment.

Interventions

OTHEROsteopathic manipulative treatment

A standardized manipulative treatment according to the results of a physical examination including 7 anatomical areas will be given by trained osteopaths during 6 sessions (with an interval of 2 weeks between 2 sessions). Each session will last 45 minutes. Osteopaths will have 3 days of training in standardized manipulative treatment.

OTHERPlacebo of osteopathic manipulative treatment

A standardized placebo of manipulative treatment consisting in light touch and according to the results of a physical examination including 7 anatomical areas will be given by trained osteopaths during 6 sessions (with an interval of 2 weeks between 2 sessions). Each session will last 45 minutes. Osteopaths will have 3 days of training in standardized placebo of manipulative treatment.

Sponsors

Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Université Paris Cité
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Paris 5 - Rene Descartes
CollaboratorOTHER
Institut Universitaire Romand de Sante au Travail
CollaboratorOTHER
URC-CIC Paris Descartes Necker Cochin
CollaboratorOTHER
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient consulting for subacute and chronic non-specific low * Male or female aged from 18 to 65 years (included) * Patient can speak and understand French * Patient giving his informed consent to participate in the study * Patient affiliated to or beneficiary of social insurance

Exclusion criteria

* Specific low-back pain caused by inflammatory, tumoral, infectious disease or a back traumatism in the 3 past months * History of back surgery and/or vertebral fracture in the previous 6 months * Presence of a motor impairment related to the reason for consultation * The patient is a student or a practitioner in manipulative therapies * Pregnancy * Inability to understand the process of the study * The patient is already included in another clinical study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean improvement from baseline in mean activity limitation3 months after randomizationAssessed with the self-administered Quebec functional scale (from 0, no limitation to 100, maximal limitation)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean reduction from baseline in mean lumbar pain in the previous 48 hrs3 months after randomizationassessed with a self-administered 11-class numeric scale (from 0 no pain to 100, maximal pain)
Number of sick leaves12 months after randomizationself-reported number of sick leaves
Duration of sick leaves12 months after randomizationself-reported total duration (days) of sick leaves
Recurrence of pain12 months after randomizationself-reported number of low back pain episodes
Mean improvement from baseline in mean activity limitation12 months after randomizationAssessed with the self-administered Quebec functional scale (from 0, no limitation to 100, maximal limitation)
Mean improvement from baseline in mean quality of life3 months after randomizationAssessed with the physical and mental components of the self-administered MOS SF-12 questionnaire (from 0, worse quality of life to 100, best quality of life)
Pain killer and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug consumption3 months after randomizationself-reported consumption of pain killer and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs since last contact ( yes/no)

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 15, 2026