Skip to content

Decision Impact Study to Measure the Influence of DECIPHER on Treatment Recommendations for Radiation Oncologists

GenomeDx Decipher Test for Metastatic Disease Prognosis in Prostate Cancer for Patients With Adverse Pathology Post Radical Prostatectomy: Does it Impact Radiation Oncologist' Treatment Recommendations?

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02034812
Acronym
DECIDE3
Enrollment
25
Registered
2014-01-14
Start date
2013-07-31
Completion date
2014-07-31
Last updated
2016-02-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate Cancer

Brief summary

This clinical utility study is based on a review of real but de-identified and randomized patient cases and aims to evaluate radiation oncologist's treatment recommendations before and after reviewing the results provided by the Decipher test. The primary intent is to help guide development and design of future clinical utility studies for Decipher.

Detailed description

Patient cases were selected using existing data generated from patient specimens collected in a separate IRB approved protocol, in which pathological specimens were tested to generate a test result for comparison to outcomes. Those test results are presented in this study, but not the individual patient outcomes. Physicians participating in this current study did not provide care for any of the subjects in the previous study. Cases are presented to physicians in a randomized order and in a form that prevents the patients from being identified, directly or indirectly. High risk patient cases were selected to reflect a range of clinicopathological variables and were further stratified based on the Decipher predicted probability of developing metastasis 5 years after RP and 3 years after BCR (as shown in the table below). High (low) Decipher (GC) risk was defined as a 5- or 3-year predicted probability of metastasis greater (less) than 6% for the adjuvant setting and greater (less) than 18% for the salvage setting.

Interventions

Pathological data from 12 de-identified patient cases will be reviewed by at least 25 Radiation Oncologists before and after exposure to the Decipher test results. Given the number of patient cases, reviewed by each participant, this allows for assessment of decision making based on 300 patient case reviews at each time point, immediately following RP and at the time of PSA rise.

Sponsors

Brigham and Women's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
GenomeDx Biosciences Corp
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Case Inclusion Criteria: Patient cases eligible for this study were treated with radical prostatectomy and have one or more adverse pathological features present defined as: Pathological Gleason score ≥ 8 or Gleason score 7 with primary pattern 4; Pathological stage T3a (= Extracapsular extension) or T3b (=Seminal vesicle invasion); Positive surgical margins Gleason grade upgrade from biopsy to surgery Detectable PSA, defined as failure of PSA to fall to undetectable, or PSA detectable and rising on 2 or more subsequent determinations Case

Exclusion criteria

Metastatic disease (M+) prior to surgery Received any neo-adjuvant prostate cancer treatment prior to radical prostatectomy (radiation, hormone, chemotherapy)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in treatment recommendation12 monthsChange in treatment recommendation from pre- to post-Decipher report, defined as any change in treatment recommendation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Specific change in treatment recommendation12 months1\. Change in treatment recommendation from pre- to post-Decipher report defined as any of the following: Observation to Any treatment Any treatment to Observation
Measure of Intensity of treatment12 monthsChange in treatment recommendation from pre- to post-Decipher report involving an increase or decrease in intensity.
Confidence in treatment12 monthsChanges in Radiation Oncologist's expressed level of confidence in the treatment recommendation
Utility of Decipher test12 monthsRadiation Oncologist's perception regarding the utility of the Decipher test

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026