Comparison of RAM Cannula Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Versus Infant Flow Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (NCPAP)

Comparison of RAM Cannula NCPAP Versus Infant Flow NCPAP

Status

Terminated

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT02032511

Enrollment

Registered

2014-01-10

Start date

2013-09-30

Completion date

2014-04-30

Last updated

2017-01-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Respiratory Deficiency, Assisted Ventilation, Prematurity

Brief summary

This study is designed to compare the effectiveness and ease of use of two commonly used NCPAP interfaces: the RAM NC and the Infant Flow prongs and nasal mask.

Interventions

None listed

Study design

Observational model

COHORT

Time perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

No minimum to 6 Months

Healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria

* less than or equal to 7 kg * order for nasal continuous positive pressure

Exclusion criteria

* patients greater than 7kg * patients that do not have informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Number of patients who achieve unassisted breathing	One year

Outcome results