Skip to content

A Study of Dapsone Gel in Females With Skin of Color and Acne Vulgaris

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02032407
Enrollment
68
Registered
2014-01-10
Start date
2013-12-31
Completion date
2014-09-30
Last updated
2015-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acne Vulgaris

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the effect of dapsone gel in female subjects with skin of color (Fitzpatrick Skin Types IV, V, and VI) with acne vulgaris.

Interventions

Dapsone Gel (Aczone®) applied twice daily to the face for 12 weeks.

Sponsors

Allergan
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of acne vulgaris * Medium to dark complexion (Fitzpatrick Skin Type IV, V or VI) * Willing to avoid excessive or prolonged exposure of the face to ultraviolet light (eg, sunlight, tanning beds) throughout the study

Exclusion criteria

* Received treatment with botulinum toxin of any serotype in the face within 6 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in the Global Assessment of Acne Severity (GAAS) Score by PhysicianBaseline, Week 12The investigator evaluated the participant's acne severity using the 5-point GAAS grading scale: 0= No evidence of facial acne vulgaris to 4= Significant degree of inflammatory disease; papules/pustules were a predominant feature; a few nodulo-cystic lesions could have been present; comedones (small pumps on the skin caused by acne) could have been present. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Lesion CountsBaseline, Weeks 2, 6 and 12The investigator evaluated Inflammatory (papule, pustule and nodule/cyst) and Non-inflammatory (blackhead and whitehead) lesions. A papule is a small, red, solid elevation less than 1.0 cm in diameter, a pustule is a small, circumscribed elevation of the skin that contains yellow-white exudate and a nodule/cyst is a circumscribed, elevated, solid lesion generally more than 0.5 cm in diameter with palpable depth. The total lesion count was the sum of the inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesion counts. A negative percent change from baseline indicates a reduction in lesion counts (improvement).
Percent Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion CountsBaseline, Weeks 2, 6 and 12The investigator evaluated Inflammatory lesions (papule, pustule and nodule/cyst). A negative percent change from baseline indicates a reduction in lesion counts (improvement).
Percent Change From Baseline in Non-Inflammatory Lesion CountsBaseline, Weeks 2, 6 and 12The investigator evaluated Non-inflammatory (blackhead and whitehead) lesions. A negative percent change from baseline indicates a reduction in lesion counts (improvement).
Change From Baseline in the GAASBaseline, Weeks 2 and 6The investigator evaluated the participant's acne severity using the 5-point GAAS grading scale: 0= No evidence of facial acne vulgaris to 4= Significant degree of inflammatory disease; papules/pustules were a predominant feature; a few nodulo-cystic lesions could have been present; comedones (small pumps on the skin caused by acne) could have been present. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Acne Symptom and Impact Scale (ASIS) Sign Domain ScoreWeeks 2, 6 and 12The participant assessed signs of acne vulgaris using the ASIS. The sign domain is a composite of 9 items of the 17 items on the overall scale. Each of the items is answered on a 5-point scale: 0 (best) to 4 (worst). The sign domain score is calculated as the average of the 9 items for a total possible score of 0 to 4. Higher scores indicate the presence of more severe signs of acne.
ASIS Impact Domain ScoreWeeks 2, 6 and 12The participant assessed the impact of acne vulgaris using the ASIS. The impact domain is a composite of 8 items assessing the psychosocial impacts (6 items emotional and 2 items social) of the 17 items on the overall scale. Each of the items is answered on a 5-point scale: 0 (best) to 4 (worst). The impact domain score is calculated as the average of the 8 items for a total possible score of 0 to 4. Higher scores on the ASIS Impact Domain indicate greater negative impact of acne on health-related quality of life and appearance.
Percentage of Participants With 0 (None) or 1 (Minimal) on the GAASWeeks 2, 6 and 12The investigator evaluated the participant's acne severity using the 5-point GAAS grading scale: 0= No evidence of facial acne vulgaris to 4= Significant degree of inflammatory disease; papules/pustules were a predominant feature; a few nodulo-cystic lesions could have been present; comedones (small pumps on the skin caused by acne) could have been present. The percentage of participants with a score of 0=none or 1=minimal is reported.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Dapsone Gel
Dapsone Gel (Aczone®) applied twice daily to the face for 12 weeks.
67
Total67

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up2
Overall StudyOther Miscellaneous Reasons2
Overall StudyPregnancy1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDapsone Gel
Age, Customized
18 to <30 years
32 participants
Age, Customized
≥30 to <50 years
32 participants
Age, Customized
≥50 years
3 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
67 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 68
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 68

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in the Global Assessment of Acne Severity (GAAS) Score by Physician

The investigator evaluated the participant's acne severity using the 5-point GAAS grading scale: 0= No evidence of facial acne vulgaris to 4= Significant degree of inflammatory disease; papules/pustules were a predominant feature; a few nodulo-cystic lesions could have been present; comedones (small pumps on the skin caused by acne) could have been present. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Modified Intent-to treat (mITT) population included all enrolled participants who received at least one application of study treatment and had at least one post-Baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dapsone GelChange From Baseline in the Global Assessment of Acne Severity (GAAS) Score by PhysicianBaseline2.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.72
Dapsone GelChange From Baseline in the Global Assessment of Acne Severity (GAAS) Score by PhysicianChange from Baseline at Week 12-1.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.88
Secondary

Acne Symptom and Impact Scale (ASIS) Sign Domain Score

The participant assessed signs of acne vulgaris using the ASIS. The sign domain is a composite of 9 items of the 17 items on the overall scale. Each of the items is answered on a 5-point scale: 0 (best) to 4 (worst). The sign domain score is calculated as the average of the 9 items for a total possible score of 0 to 4. Higher scores indicate the presence of more severe signs of acne.

Time frame: Weeks 2, 6 and 12

Population: Participants from the mITT population, all enrolled participants who received at least one application of study treatment and had at least one post-Baseline efficacy assessment, with data at the given time-point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dapsone GelAcne Symptom and Impact Scale (ASIS) Sign Domain ScoreWeek 21.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.72
Dapsone GelAcne Symptom and Impact Scale (ASIS) Sign Domain ScoreWeek 6 (n=60)1.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.68
Dapsone GelAcne Symptom and Impact Scale (ASIS) Sign Domain ScoreWeek 12 (n=63)1.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.67
Secondary

ASIS Impact Domain Score

The participant assessed the impact of acne vulgaris using the ASIS. The impact domain is a composite of 8 items assessing the psychosocial impacts (6 items emotional and 2 items social) of the 17 items on the overall scale. Each of the items is answered on a 5-point scale: 0 (best) to 4 (worst). The impact domain score is calculated as the average of the 8 items for a total possible score of 0 to 4. Higher scores on the ASIS Impact Domain indicate greater negative impact of acne on health-related quality of life and appearance.

Time frame: Weeks 2, 6 and 12

Population: Participants from the mITT population, all enrolled participants who received at least one application of study treatment and had at least one post-Baseline efficacy assessment, with data available for analysis at the given time-point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dapsone GelASIS Impact Domain ScoreWeek 21.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.91
Dapsone GelASIS Impact Domain ScoreWeek 6 (n=60)1.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.91
Dapsone GelASIS Impact Domain ScoreWeek 12 (n=63)1.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.91
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the GAAS

The investigator evaluated the participant's acne severity using the 5-point GAAS grading scale: 0= No evidence of facial acne vulgaris to 4= Significant degree of inflammatory disease; papules/pustules were a predominant feature; a few nodulo-cystic lesions could have been present; comedones (small pumps on the skin caused by acne) could have been present. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2 and 6

Population: Modified Intent-to treat (mITT) population included all enrolled participants who received at least one application of study treatment and had at least one post-Baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dapsone GelChange From Baseline in the GAASBaseline2.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.72
Dapsone GelChange From Baseline in the GAASChange from Baseline at Week 2-0.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.63
Dapsone GelChange From Baseline in the GAASChange from Baseline at Week 6-0.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.74
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With 0 (None) or 1 (Minimal) on the GAAS

The investigator evaluated the participant's acne severity using the 5-point GAAS grading scale: 0= No evidence of facial acne vulgaris to 4= Significant degree of inflammatory disease; papules/pustules were a predominant feature; a few nodulo-cystic lesions could have been present; comedones (small pumps on the skin caused by acne) could have been present. The percentage of participants with a score of 0=none or 1=minimal is reported.

Time frame: Weeks 2, 6 and 12

Population: Participants from the mITT, all enrolled participants who received at least one application of study treatment and had at least one post-Baseline efficacy assessment, with data available at the given time-point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Dapsone GelPercentage of Participants With 0 (None) or 1 (Minimal) on the GAASWeek 26.0 percentage of participants
Dapsone GelPercentage of Participants With 0 (None) or 1 (Minimal) on the GAASWeek 6 (n=61)13.1 percentage of participants
Dapsone GelPercentage of Participants With 0 (None) or 1 (Minimal) on the GAASWeek 12 (n=63)42.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion Counts

The investigator evaluated Inflammatory lesions (papule, pustule and nodule/cyst). A negative percent change from baseline indicates a reduction in lesion counts (improvement).

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 6 and 12

Population: Participants from the Modified Intent-to treat (mITT) population, all enrolled participants who received at least one application of study treatment and had at least one post-Baseline efficacy assessment, with data available at the given time-point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dapsone GelPercent Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion CountsChange from Baseline at Week 2-25.0 percent changeStandard Deviation 32.01
Dapsone GelPercent Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion CountsChange from Baseline at Week 6 (n=61)-48.0 percent changeStandard Deviation 26.72
Dapsone GelPercent Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion CountsChange from Baseline at Week 12 (n=63)-65.0 percent changeStandard Deviation 23.31
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Non-Inflammatory Lesion Counts

The investigator evaluated Non-inflammatory (blackhead and whitehead) lesions. A negative percent change from baseline indicates a reduction in lesion counts (improvement).

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 6 and 12

Population: Participants from the Modified Intent-to treat (mITT) population, all enrolled participants who received at least one application of study treatment and had at least one post-Baseline efficacy assessment, with data available at the given time-point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dapsone GelPercent Change From Baseline in Non-Inflammatory Lesion CountsChange from Baseline at Week 2-9.8 percent changeStandard Deviation 32.03
Dapsone GelPercent Change From Baseline in Non-Inflammatory Lesion CountsChange from Baseline at Week 6 (n=61)-16.0 percent changeStandard Deviation 36.19
Dapsone GelPercent Change From Baseline in Non-Inflammatory Lesion CountsChange from Baseline at Week 12 (n=63)-41.0 percent changeStandard Deviation 34.15
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Counts

The investigator evaluated Inflammatory (papule, pustule and nodule/cyst) and Non-inflammatory (blackhead and whitehead) lesions. A papule is a small, red, solid elevation less than 1.0 cm in diameter, a pustule is a small, circumscribed elevation of the skin that contains yellow-white exudate and a nodule/cyst is a circumscribed, elevated, solid lesion generally more than 0.5 cm in diameter with palpable depth. The total lesion count was the sum of the inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesion counts. A negative percent change from baseline indicates a reduction in lesion counts (improvement).

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 6 and 12

Population: Participants from the Modified Intent-to treat (mITT) population, all enrolled participants who received at least one application of study treatment and had at least one post-Baseline efficacy assessment, with data available at the given time-point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dapsone GelPercent Change From Baseline in Total Lesion CountsChange from Baseline at Week 2-16.0 percent changeStandard Deviation 23.45
Dapsone GelPercent Change From Baseline in Total Lesion CountsChange from Baseline at Week 6 (n=61)-30.0 percent changeStandard Deviation 26.15
Dapsone GelPercent Change From Baseline in Total Lesion CountsChange from Baseline at Week 12 (n=63)-52.0 percent changeStandard Deviation 26.96

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026