Skip to content

Pronase Improves Efficacy of Chromoendoscopy Screening on Esophageal Cancer

Pronase Improves Efficacy of Chromoendoscopy Screening on Esophageal Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02030769
Enrollment
1000
Registered
2014-01-09
Start date
2014-01-31
Completion date
2014-12-31
Last updated
2016-03-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Esophageal Neoplasms

Keywords

Esophageal Neoplasms, Lugol's solution, Pronase, Endoscopy, Digestive System, Pretreatment method

Brief summary

Lugol's solution staining was regarded as a gold standard to detect early superficial lesion during esophageal cancer screening using endoscopy. However, the sensitivity and specificity were influenced by mucus and food debris of esophagus. Pronase, a kind of protease, was previously shown to improve the visibility of gastrointestinal tract. It's unknown if the pre-treatment with pronase would also improve the quality of iodine staining in esophagus.A randomized double-blind clinical trial was designed to investigate whether or not pronase might improve detection rate of early esophageal lesion, especially high grade dysplasia and early cancer by improving the esophageal visibility.

Interventions

use pronase to improve visibility during endoscopical iodine staining

DRUGControl

No pronase plus Dimethicone and sodium bicarbonate. use without pronase to compare visibility during endoscopical iodiine staining

Sponsors

Beijing Tide Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients 60 years to 75 years old * Patients less than 60 years old, but with one or multiple high risk factors for esophageal cancer including smoking and drinking addiction,family history of esophageal cancer, personal history of esophageal or head and neck malignancies, previous endoscopy documenting iodine void superficial lesion.

Exclusion criteria

* Allergy to iodine or any other medicine which used in this trial. * Previous endoscopy revealing advanced esophageal cancer or other non-superficial lesions. * Conditions interfering visibility of endoscope including gastrointestinal obstruction and upper gastrointestinal bleeding. * Anatomic variation by surgery. * Pregnancy * Other conditions which investigator consider the patient at high risk for complications.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Detection rate of high grade dysplasia and carcinoma in iodine void lesion1 weekDetection Rate=(lesions with confirmed high grade dysplasia/all iodine void lesions)\*100%

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Average Esophageal Visibility Score Before iodine staining30 min after ingesting pretreatment solution
Average Esophageal Visibility Score After iodine stainingwithin 5 min after iodine staining
Detection Rate of lesions with pink signwithin 5 min after iodine staining
overall detection rate of iodine void lesionwithin 5 min after iodine staining

Other

MeasureTime frame
observation time for esophaguswith 30 min after intubation

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026