Skip to content

The LEADLESS II IDE Study for the Nanostim Leadless Pacemaker

The LEADLESS II IDE Study (Phase I): Safety and Effectiveness Trial for the Nanostim Leadless Pacemaker

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02030418
Enrollment
952
Registered
2014-01-08
Start date
2014-02-28
Completion date
2022-07-15
Last updated
2025-07-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bradycardia

Brief summary

Prospective, non-randomized, single-arm, international multicenter, clinical safety and effectiveness of a leadless pacemaker system in patients who are indicated for a VVIR pacemaker. Following completion of enrollments in the IDE, patients will continue to be enrolled in the continued access phase of the study under the same protocol.

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the leadless pacemaker system in treating patients with a slow heart rate or irregular heartbeats. The Nanostim leadless pacemaker provides bradycardia pacing as a pulse generator with built-in battery and electrodes, for permanent implantation in the right ventricle. As a leadless pacemaker, it does not need a connector, pacing lead, or pulse generator pocket, but it has the same operating principles as a conventional pacemaker.

Interventions

Patients will undergo an attempted leadless pacemaker implant

Sponsors

Abbott Medical Devices
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Subject must have one of the clinical indications before device implant in adherence with Medicare, ACC/AHA/HRS/ESC single chamber pacing guidelines including: * Chronic and/or permanent atrial fibrillation with 2 or 3° AV or bifascicular bundle branch block (BBB block), including slow ventricular rates (with or without medication) associated with atrial fibrillation; or * Normal sinus rhythm with 2 or 3° AV or BBB block and a low level of physical activity or short expected lifespan (but at least one year); or * Sinus bradycardia with infrequent pauses or unexplained syncope with EP findings; and 2. Subject ≥18 years of age; and 3. Subject has life expectancy of at least one year; and 4. Subject is not enrolled in another clinical investigation; and 5. Subject is willing to comply with clinical investigation procedures and agrees to return for all required follow-up visits, tests, and exams; and 6. Subject has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions and has provided written informed consent, approved by the IRB; and 7. Subject is not pregnant and does not plan to get pregnant during the course of the study.

Exclusion criteria

1. Subject has pacemaker syndrome, has retrograde VA conduction or suffers a drop in arterial blood pressure with the onset of ventricular pacing; or 2. Subject is allergic or hypersensitive to \<1 mg of dexamethasone sodium phosphate; or 3. Subject has a mechanical tricuspid valve prosthesis; or 4. Subject has a pre-existing endocardial pacing or defibrillation leads; or 5. Subject has current implantation of either conventional or subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT); or 6. Subject has an implanted vena cava filter; or 7. Subject has evidence of thrombosis in one of the veins used for access during the procedure; or 8. Subject has an implanted leadless cardiac pacemaker; or 9. Subject had recent cardiovascular or peripheral vascular surgery within 30 days of enrollment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Complication-Free Rate6 monthsComplication is any device-or-procedure related serious adverse event, or serious adverse device effect, including those that prevented initial implantation. Percentage of participants free from complications are reported
Pacing Thresholds and R-wave Amplitudes Within the Therapeutic Range6 monthsSuccess Rate is percentage of subjects who have acceptable pacing threshold and sensing amplitudes, which are defined as pacing threshold \<=2.0V at 0.4 ms pulse width and R-wave amplitude either =\>5.0 mV at the 6 month visit or =\> value at implant.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Appropriate and Proportional Rate Response During Graded Exercise Testing3-6 monthsTemperature-based rate response feature was evaluated to determine whether an appropriate and proportional rate response was achieved during maximal effort graded treadmill exercise testing protocol (CAEP). All capable subjects who have completed the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) were asked to perform a maximal effort CAEP exercise protocol to demonstrate an appropriate and proportional response of sensor-indicated rate in graded exercise tests. Data from subjects who have completed the 6MWT and have completed at least stage 3 of the CAEP exercise protocol, or 3.6 metabolic equivalent of task (METs), were included in the analysis.

Countries

Australia, Canada, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Leadless Pacemaker
VVIR pacing Leadless Pacemaker: Patients will undergo an attempted leadless pacemaker implant
952
Total952

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDeath78
Overall StudyMissed 12-Month Visit9
Overall StudyWithdrawn57

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLeadless Pacemaker
Age, Continuous75.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6
Arrhythmia History
Non-Ventricular / Supraventricular
727 participants
Arrhythmia History
Ventricular
43 participants
Cardiac Pulmonary History
Coronary Artery Disease
334 participants
Cardiac Pulmonary History
Myocardial Infarction
127 participants
Cardiac Pulmonary History
Prior CABG
129 participants
Cardiac Pulmonary History
Prior PTCA / Stents / Atherectomy
144 participants
Cardiac Pulmonary History
Unstable Angina
25 participants
Congestive Heart Failure149 Participants
Diabetes
Type I
14 participants
Diabetes
Type II
228 participants
Diabetes Current Status
Controlled with Diet
44 participants
Diabetes Current Status
Controlled with Medication(s)
191 participants
Diabetes Current Status
Uncontrolled
7 participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
36 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
913 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants
Hyperlipidemia
Hyperlipidemia Controlled with Diet
90 participants
Hyperlipidemia
Hyperlipidemia Controlled with Medication(s)
509 participants
Hyperlipidemia
Uncontrolled Hyperlipidemia
16 participants
Hypertension
Controlled with Medication(s)
690 participants
Hypertension
Controlled Without Medication(s)
1 participants
Hypertension
Uncontrolled
45 participants
LV Ejection Fraction57.9 percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1
Medications
ACE Inhibitors
249 participants
Medications
Angiotensin Receptor Blockers
167 participants
Medications
Antiarrhythmics (Class I)
18 participants
Medications
Antiarrhythmics (Class III)
62 participants
Medications
Anticoagulants
571 participants
Medications
Antiplatelets
407 participants
Medications
Beta Blockers
357 participants
NYHA Class
Class I
34 participants
NYHA Class
Class II
57 participants
NYHA Class
Class III
21 participants
NYHA Class
Not Done
37 participants
Pacemaker Indication
Chronic AF with 2nd or 3rd Degree AV Block or Bundle Branch Block, including slow ventricular rates
529 Participants
Pacemaker Indication
Sinus Bradycardia with Infrequent Pauses or Unexplained Syncope
330 Participants
Pacemaker Indication
Sinus Rhythm with 2nd or 3rd Degree AV Block or Byundle Branch Block
96 Participants
Peripheral Vascular Disease113 participants
Prior Ablation
AFib / Aflutter
78 participants
Prior Ablation
AV Nodal
17 participants
Prior Ablation
Mini Maze, Thorascope / LAA Ligation
2 participants
Prior Ablation
SVT/AVNRT Ablation
12 participants
Prior Ablation
Unkown
1 participants
Prior Ablation
VT
2 participants
Prior Ablation
Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome
2 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian / Alaska Native
3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
22 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
61 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other (Not Specified)
4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White or Caucasian
862 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
24 participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
101 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
827 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
359 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
593 Participants
Tricuspid Valve Disease
Insufficiency / Prolapse / Regurgitation
184 participants
Tricuspid Valve Disease
Repair / Replacement
7 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
276 / 952
other
Total, other adverse events
236 / 952
serious
Total, serious adverse events
436 / 952

Outcome results

Primary

Complication-Free Rate

Complication is any device-or-procedure related serious adverse event, or serious adverse device effect, including those that prevented initial implantation. Percentage of participants free from complications are reported

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Analyses of the primary safety and effectiveness endpoints are performed on the Intent to treat (ITT) population. The ITT population is defined as subjects who meet enrollment criteria, provide signed informed consent, and who have an attempted implant of the LP. The study required a sample size of 300 evaluable subjects. The 300-subject primary analysis cohort is defined as the first 300 enrolled subjects sorted by implant date and sheath insertion time.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Leadless PacemakerComplication-Free Rate93.3 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [89.9, 95.9]1-sided exact test for binomial proporti
Primary

Pacing Thresholds and R-wave Amplitudes Within the Therapeutic Range

Success Rate is percentage of subjects who have acceptable pacing threshold and sensing amplitudes, which are defined as pacing threshold \<=2.0V at 0.4 ms pulse width and R-wave amplitude either =\>5.0 mV at the 6 month visit or =\> value at implant.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Analysis of the primary effectiveness endpoints was performed on subjects in the Intent to treat (ITT) population with a successful Nanostim Leadless Pacemaker implanted. This number included 289 of the 300 (96.3%) subjects in the ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Leadless PacemakerPacing Thresholds and R-wave Amplitudes Within the Therapeutic Range93.4 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [89.9, 96]1-sided exact test for binomial proporti
Secondary

Appropriate and Proportional Rate Response During Graded Exercise Testing

Temperature-based rate response feature was evaluated to determine whether an appropriate and proportional rate response was achieved during maximal effort graded treadmill exercise testing protocol (CAEP). All capable subjects who have completed the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) were asked to perform a maximal effort CAEP exercise protocol to demonstrate an appropriate and proportional response of sensor-indicated rate in graded exercise tests. Data from subjects who have completed the 6MWT and have completed at least stage 3 of the CAEP exercise protocol, or 3.6 metabolic equivalent of task (METs), were included in the analysis.

Time frame: 3-6 months

Population: Subjects within the enrolled population with a successful implant who completed the six-minute walk test and completed at least stage 3 of the CAEP.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Leadless PacemakerAppropriate and Proportional Rate Response During Graded Exercise Testing0.83 1/(minutes*metabolic equivalent task)
p-value: 0.00195% CI: [0.73, 0.93]two 1-sided test (TOST)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 4, 2026