Skip to content

ACTH Gel Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Open Label Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Short-Term, Adjunctive Adrenocorticotropic Hormone (ACTH) Gel in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02030028
Enrollment
18
Registered
2014-01-08
Start date
2014-11-30
Completion date
2022-06-30
Last updated
2023-09-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Keywords

Rheumatoid Arthritis, ACTH gel

Brief summary

The purpose of this research study is to evaluate if the study drug, ACTH Gel helps decrease the disease symptoms in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) who are already taking medications prescribed by their physician and are still experiencing disease symptoms. ACTH gel has been a Food and Drug Administration-approved treatment for Rheumatoid Arthritis since 1952, and in 2010 the FDA retained RA as a disease approved for ACTH gel use. Despite its FDA approval there is very limited data on its how well ACTH gel works in improving the symptoms of people with RA.

Detailed description

This study is for people who are currently taking a biologic therapy for Rheumatoid Arthritis and who are still experiencing symptoms. Subjects are given the ACTH gel to take twice each week for 12 weeks as a supplement to current therapies. Subjects are required to visit the clinic for a baseline visit, at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks. We will obtain a blood sample for research purposes.

Interventions

Subjects are given the ACTHAR gel subcutaneously twice per week for 12 weeks.

Sponsors

Mallinckrodt
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Dana Ascherman
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 18 year of age and older * RA diagnosis by American College of Rheumatology criteria * Active disease (CDAI \> 10) * Have received at least are biologic agent for at least 6 months * May or may not be receiving oral daily steroids (less than or equal to 20 mg/day) of prednisone equivalent * No current active infections requiring antibiotics * Patients must be on stable doses of RA therapies (e.g., methotrexate or other RA therapies for at least 4 weeks prior to baseline visit)

Exclusion criteria

* Less than 18 years of age * Unable or unwilling to give Informed Consent * Have an active infection requiring the use of antibiotics * Women who are pregnant * Uncontrolled hypertension * Abnormal renal function * Abnormal liver function as defined by and increased Alanine transaminase (ALT,) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) that is greater than 5 times normal.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Between Week 0 and Week 1212 weekspercentage of participants achieving \>20% improvement in CDAI after 12 weeks of therapy (\>20% reduction in CDAI relative to baseline based on ratio of CDAI at week 12 to CDAI at week 0: CDAI Week 12/CDAI Week 0 \< 0.8 meets criteria for improvement, as lower CDAI scores represent lower disease activity)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in the Disease Activity Score (DAS28-CRP) Between Week 0 and Week 1212 weeksChange in the Disease Activity Score 28-CRP (DAS28-CRP) at week 12 relative to baseline (week 0), where lower DAS28-CRP scores at week 12 represent improvement. Scale: 0-8.61 (lower scores indicate reduced disease activity)
Changes in Acute Phase Reactants (CRP) Between Week 0 and Week 1212 weeksChanges in C-reactive protein value (mg/dl): reduction in CRP values at week 12 relative to week 0 represents improvement (week 12 CRP-baseline CRP \< 0))
Change in Acute Phase Reactants (ESR) Between Week 0 and Week 1212 weeksChange in ESR--reduction in ESR at week 12 relative to baseline (week 0) represents improvement (week 12 ESR - baseline ERS \< 0)
Patient Reported Changes in Fatigue Between Week 0 and Week 1212 weeksThe FACIT-F (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue) scoring metric assesses fatigue using 13 questions rated on a Likert scale of 0 (no fatigue)-4 (severe fatigue); total scores range from 0-52, with higher total scores representing more severe fatigue. The difference in FACIT-F scores between weeks 12 and week 0 (calculated as FACIT-F score week 12 minus FACIT-F score at week 0) indicates changes in fatigue relative to baseline, where reduction of FACIT-F score at week 12 represents improvement in fatigue.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

No patients were excluded from the study based on enrollment criteria. Because ACTHAR administration was add on therapy, no wash out period was required.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
ACTHAR Gel
Open label Adrenocorticotropic Hormone (ACTH) Gel for 12 weeks, 80u (1mL), given subcutaneously twice each week. ACTHAR gel: Subjects are given the ACTHAR gel subcutaneously twice per week for 12 weeks.
18
Total18

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall Studylack of transportation1
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject4

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicACTHAR Gel
Age, Continuous55.3 years
CDAI (Clinical Disease Activity Index)27 units on a scale
C-Reactive Protein (CRP)0.42 mg/dl
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.33
DAS28-CRP (Disease Activity Score 28--CRP)4.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6
DAS28-ESR (Disease Activity Score 28--ESR)5.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)37.2 mm/hr
STANDARD_DEVIATION 33.8
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
16 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants
FACIT (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy) Fatigue Scale26 units on a scale
fatigue severity scale--functional well-being subscale13 units on a scale
Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity7 units on a scale
Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity5 units on a scale
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
12 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
18 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
16 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants
Swollen Joints6 joints
Tender Joints6 joints

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 18
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 18
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 18

Outcome results

Primary

Changes in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Between Week 0 and Week 12

percentage of participants achieving \>20% improvement in CDAI after 12 weeks of therapy (\>20% reduction in CDAI relative to baseline based on ratio of CDAI at week 12 to CDAI at week 0: CDAI Week 12/CDAI Week 0 \< 0.8 meets criteria for improvement, as lower CDAI scores represent lower disease activity)

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: Study completers (9/13 had evaluable data at baseline and week 12)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ACTHAR GelChanges in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Between Week 0 and Week 128 Participants
Secondary

Change in Acute Phase Reactants (ESR) Between Week 0 and Week 12

Change in ESR--reduction in ESR at week 12 relative to baseline (week 0) represents improvement (week 12 ESR - baseline ERS \< 0)

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: Study completers--8/13 with evaluable data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ACTHAR GelChange in Acute Phase Reactants (ESR) Between Week 0 and Week 12-7.38 mm/hrStandard Deviation 28.3
Secondary

Change in the Disease Activity Score (DAS28-CRP) Between Week 0 and Week 12

Change in the Disease Activity Score 28-CRP (DAS28-CRP) at week 12 relative to baseline (week 0), where lower DAS28-CRP scores at week 12 represent improvement. Scale: 0-8.61 (lower scores indicate reduced disease activity)

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: Study completers--5/13 with evaluable data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ACTHAR GelChange in the Disease Activity Score (DAS28-CRP) Between Week 0 and Week 12-0.87 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.75
Secondary

Changes in Acute Phase Reactants (CRP) Between Week 0 and Week 12

Changes in C-reactive protein value (mg/dl): reduction in CRP values at week 12 relative to week 0 represents improvement (week 12 CRP-baseline CRP \< 0))

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: Study completers--7/13 with evaluable data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ACTHAR GelChanges in Acute Phase Reactants (CRP) Between Week 0 and Week 120.36 mg/dlStandard Deviation 1.33
Secondary

Patient Reported Changes in Fatigue Between Week 0 and Week 12

The FACIT-F (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue) scoring metric assesses fatigue using 13 questions rated on a Likert scale of 0 (no fatigue)-4 (severe fatigue); total scores range from 0-52, with higher total scores representing more severe fatigue. The difference in FACIT-F scores between weeks 12 and week 0 (calculated as FACIT-F score week 12 minus FACIT-F score at week 0) indicates changes in fatigue relative to baseline, where reduction of FACIT-F score at week 12 represents improvement in fatigue.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: Study completers--13/13 with evaluable data

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
ACTHAR GelPatient Reported Changes in Fatigue Between Week 0 and Week 12-3.8 units on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026