Skip to content

ACP-196 (Acalabrutinib), a Novel Bruton Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Inhibitor, for Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Richter's Syndrome or Prolymphocytic Leukemia

A Phase 1/2, Multicenter, Open-label, and Dose-escalation Study of ACP-196 in Subjects With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Richter's Syndrome or Prolymphocytic Leukemia

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02029443
Enrollment
306
Registered
2014-01-08
Start date
2014-01-30
Completion date
2027-06-09
Last updated
2026-05-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Prolymphocytic Leukemia, Richter's Syndrome, Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma

Keywords

Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor

Brief summary

This study is evaluating the safety and efficacy of a new BTK inhibitor, acalabrutinib, for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL).

Interventions

DRUGAcalabrutinib

Participants will receive acalabrutinib as stated in the arms' description.

Sponsors

Acerta Pharma BV
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Men and women ≥ 18 years of age with a confirmed diagnosis of CLL/SLL, which has relapsed after, or been refractory to, ≥ 2 previous treatments for CLL/SLL. 2. Must have measurable CLL/SLL defined as ≥ 1 lymph node ≥ 2 cm as measured in the longest diameter. 3. Active disease meeting ≥ 1 of the following International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IWCLL) 2008 criteria for requiring treatment: 1. Evidence of progressive marrow failure as manifested by the development of, or worsening of, anemia (hemoglobin \< 10 g/dL) and/or thrombocytopenia (platelets \< 100,000/μL). 2. Massive (i.e., ≥ 6 cm below the left costal margin), progressive, or symptomatic splenomegaly. 3. Massive nodes (i.e., ≥ 10 cm in the longest diameter), progressive, or symptomatic lymphadenopathy. 4. Progressive lymphocytosis with an increase of \> 50% over a 2-month period or a lymphocyte doubling time (LDT) of \< 6 months. The LDT may be obtained by linear regression extrapolation of absolute lymphocyte counts (ALC) obtained at intervals of 2 weeks over an observation period of 2 to 3 months. In participants with initial blood lymphocyte counts of \< 30 X 10\^9/L (30,000/μL), LDT should not be used as a single parameter to define indication for treatment. In addition, factors contributing to lymphocytosis or lymphadenopathy other than CLL (eg, infections) should be excluded. 5. Autoimmune anemia and/or thrombocytopenia that is poorly responsive to standard therapy. 6. Constitutional symptoms documented in the participant's chart with supportive objective measures, as appropriate, defined as ≥ 1 of the following disease-related symptoms or signs: i. Unintentional weight loss ≥ 10% within the previous 6 months before screening. ii. Fevers higher than 100.5°F or 38.0°C for 2 or more weeks before screening without evidence of infection. iii. Night sweats for \> 1 month before screening without evidence of infection. 4. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of ≤ 2. 5. Agreement to use highly effective methods of contraception during the study and for 2 days after the last dose of study drug if sexually active and able to bear or beget children (see Section 3.7.9 for list of highly effective methods of contraception). 6. Willing and able to participate in all required evaluations and procedures in this study protocol including swallowing capsules without difficulty. 7. Ability to understand the purpose and risks of the study and provide signed and dated informed consent and authorization to use protected health information (in accordance with national and local participant privacy regulations). Inclusion Criteria for Treatment Subgroups 1. Treatment Naive only: Men and women ≥ 18 years of age with confirmed diagnosis of CLL/SLL, who require treatment per National Cancer Institute (NCI) or International Working Group guidelines and a) do not want to receive chemoimmunotherapy or b) have comorbidities that would preclude chemoimmunotherapy. 2. Ibrutinib Intolerant only: Men and women ≥ 18 years of age with confirmed diagnosis of CLL/SLL who are not tolerating ibrutinib due to ibrutinib-related AEs. 3. Richter's Syndrome/Prolymphocytic Leukemia Transformation only: Men and women ≥ 18 years of age and biopsy proven diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) Richter's transformation or prolymphocytic leukemia transformation. 4. Ibrutinib relapsed/refractory (R/R) only: Men and women ≥ 18 years of age with confirmed diagnosis of CLL/SLL whose best response after 2 cycles of ibrutinib therapy was stable disease or nonresponse or who initially responded to ibrutinib therapy and now have signs of clinical progression.

Exclusion criteria

1. Prior malignancy, except for adequately treated basal cell, squamous cell skin cancer or in situ cervical cancer. Participants with other prior malignancies from which the participant has been disease free for ≥ 2 years may be included if approved by the medical monitor. 2. A life-threatening illness, medical condition or organ system dysfunction which, in the investigator's opinion, could compromise the participant's safety, interfere with the absorption or metabolism of acalabrutinib, or put the study outcomes at undue risk. 3. Significant cardiovascular disease such as uncontrolled or symptomatic arrhythmias, congestive heart failure, or myocardial infarction within 6 months of screening, or any Class 3 or 4 cardiac disease as defined by the New York Heart Association Functional Classification, or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 40%. 4. Malabsorption syndrome, disease significantly affecting gastrointestinal function, or resection of the stomach or small bowel, symptomatic inflammatory bowel disease, partial or complete bowel obstruction, or gastric restrictions and bariatric surgery, such as gastric bypass. 5. Any immunotherapy within 4 weeks of first dose of study drug. 6. For participants with recent chemotherapy or experimental therapy the first dose of study drug must occur after 5 times the half-life of the agent(s). 7. Relapsed after, or refractory to, prior BTK inhibitor therapy (Note: Does not apply to Ibrutinib R/R or Richter's Syndrome Group). 8. Any history of Richter's transformation (Note: Does not apply to Richter's Syndrome Group). 10\. Central nervous system (CNS) involvement by lymphoma. 11. Grade ≥ 2 toxicity (other than alopecia) continuing from prior anticancer therapy including radiation. 12\. Known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or serologic status indicating active hepatitis C virus (HCV) or hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection or any uncontrolled active systemic infection. Participants with hepatitis B core antibody positive who are surface antigen negative or who are hepatitis C antibody positive will need to have a negative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) result before enrollment. Those who are hepatitis B surface antigen positive or hepatitis B PCR positive and those who are hepatitis C PCR positive will be excluded. 13\. Uncontrolled autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) or immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) defined as declining hemoglobin or platelet count secondary to autoimmune destruction within the screening period or requirement for high doses of steroids (\> 20 mg daily of prednisone daily or equivalent). 14\. History of stroke or intracranial hemorrhage within 6 months prior to the first dose of study drug. 15\. Requires treatment with proton-pump inhibitors (eg, omeprazole, esomeprazole, lansoprazole, dexlansoprazole, rabeprazole, or pantoprazole). 16\. Requires anticoagulation with warfarin or equivalent vitamin K antagonists (eg, phenprocoumon) within 7 days of first dose of study drug. 17\. Major surgery within 4 weeks before first dose of study drug. 18. ANC \< 0.75 x 10\^9/L or platelet count \< 50 x 10\^9/L unless there is bone marrow involvement. 19\. Total bilirubin \> 1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN) (total bilirubin ≤ 2.5 x ULN allowed in participants with autoimmune hemolytic anemia that is otherwise controlled); and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \> 3.0 x ULN unless disease related. 20\. Serum amylase \> 1.5 x ULN or serum lipase \> 1.5 x ULN. 21. Significant screening electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities including, 2nd degree AV block type II, 3rd degree block, Grade 2 or higher bradycardia, or QTc ≥ 480 ms. 22\. Cardiac troponin I levels above the limit of normal as specified by the manufacturer. 23\. Breast feeding or pregnant. 24. History of bleeding diathesis (eg, hemophilia, von Willebrand disease). 25. Concurrent participation in another therapeutic clinical trial. 26. Estimated creatinine clearance of \< 30 mL/min, calculated using the formula of Cockcroft and Gault \[(140-Age) • Mass (kg)/(72 • creatinine mg/dL); multiply by 0.85 if female\]. 27\. Presence of a gastrointestinal ulcer diagnosed by endoscopy within 3 months before screening.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) in Phase 1From Day 1 to Day 28 after first dose of study drugParticipants with DLTs in Phase 1 are reported. The DLT was defined as any of the following events unless the adverse event is clearly related to disease progression or the participant's current medical history and associated comorbidities: (1) Any Grade 3 or greater nonhematologic toxicity with the exceptions of alopecia and Grade 3 nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea that respond to supportive therapy; (2) Hematologic toxicities including Grade 4 neutropenia lasting more than 5 days, Grade 4 or Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding or any requirement for platelets transfusion, Grade 3 or greater febrile neutropenia (body temperature of 38.5 degrees Celsius or more), or Grade 4 anemia, unexplained by underlying disease; or (3) Dosing delay due to toxicity for \> 7 consecutive days.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)Day 1 through the final data cutoff date (approximately 7 years 6 months)An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. The TEAEs are defined as events present at baseline that worsened in intensity after administration of study drug or events absent at baseline that emerged after administration of study drug.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Day 1 through the final data cutoff date (approximately 7 years 6 months)The treatment emergent ECI included the events identified based on preclinical findings, emerging data from clinical studies relating to acalabrutinib, and pharmacological effects of approved Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors and reported after the first dose of the study drug.
Number of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreDay 1 through the final data cutoff date (approximately 7 years 6 months)Participants with clinically important laboratory abnormalities with CTCAE Grade 3 or more are reported. Laboratory analysis included hematology, clinical chemistry, amylase, lipase, cardiac troponin I, hepatitis B and C testing, and urinalysis. The CTCAE version 4.03 is a descriptive terminology is used for AE reporting. The CTCAE v4.03 displays Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: Grade 3 as severe AE, Grade 4 as life-threatening or disabling AE, and Grade 5 as death related to AE.
Number of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsDay 1 through the final data cutoff date (approximately 7 years 6 months)Participants with clinically abnormal vital signs (blood pressure, respiratory rate, pulse rate, or body temperature) reported as TEAEs are reported.
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours (AUC0-6) of AcalabrutinibPredose and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours postdose on Day 1 and Day 8The AUC0-6 of acalabrutinib is reported.
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-last) of AcalabrutinibPredose and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours postdose on Day 1 and Day 8The AUC0-last of acalabrutinib is reported.
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of AcalabrutinibPredose and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours postdose on Day 1 and Day 8The AUC0-inf of Acalabrutinib is reported.
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of AcalabrutinibPredose and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours postdose on Day 1 and Day 8The Cmax of Acalabrutinib is reported.
Time of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of AcalabrutinibPredose and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours postdose on Day 1 and Day 8The Tmax of Acalabrutinib is reported.
Terminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2) of AcalabrutinibPredose and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours postdose on Day 1 and Day 8The t1/2 of acalabrutinib is reported.
Terminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz) of AcalabrutinibPredose and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours postdose on Day 1 and Day 8The λz of acalabrutinib is reported.
Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) of AcalabrutinibPredose and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours postdose on Day 1 and Day 8The CL/F of acalabrutinib is reported.
Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of AcalabrutinibPredose and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours postdose on Day 1 and Day 8The Vz/F of acalabrutinib is reported.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR) as Assessed by the InvestigatorDay 1 through the final data cutoff date (approximately 7 years 6 months)For CLL/SLL, OR is defined as complete remission (CR), CR with incomplete marrow recovery (CRi), or partial remission (PR). CR: lymphocytes (lympho) \<4×10\^9/L, normocellular bone marrow (BM), normal lymph nodes (NLN), liver and spleen (L/S), absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \>1.5×10\^9/L, platelets \>100×10\^9/L, hemoglobin (Hb) \>11g/dL. Cri: lympho \<4×10\^9/L, hypocellular BM, NLN, L/S, persistent anemia, hrombocytopenia, or neutropenia. PR: \>=50% reduction in lymphadenopathy and/or enlargement of L/S or lympho (\<5×10\^9/L or \>=50% decrease from baseline) and criteria of ANC/platelets/Hb per CR or \>=50% improvement over baseline. Hematology result were without exogenous growth factors/transfusion. For RS, OR as CR or PR by Cheson et al. 2014 based on PET/CT scans and bone marrow. CR: disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms and PR: \>=50% decrease in sum of the product diameter of 6 largest nodal masses and no new sites of disease.
Duration of Response (DOR) as Assessed by the InvestigatorDay 1 through the final data cutoff date (approximately 7 years 6 months)The DoR is defined as the time from the date of achieving the first CR, CRi, or PR to the date of progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. The CR, CRi, or PR are defined in the above outcome measure. For CLL/SLL, PD is defined as lympho \>=50% increase from baseline with \>= 5000 B lymphocytes/µL, progressive cytopenias by bone marrow biopsy, appearance of any new lesion or new appearance of hepatomegaly or splenomegaly or \>= 50 % increase in lymphadenopathy/hepatomegaly/splenomegaly, platelets decrease of \>=50% from baseline secondary to CLL or \< 100,000/µL and worsening bone marrow or Hb decrease of \> 2 g/dL from baseline secondary to CLL or decrease to less than 100 g/L and worsening bone marrow. For RS, PD is defined as an increase by 25 % in longest diameter, new lesion or assessable disease progression. The DoR was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the InvestigatorDay 1 through the final data cutoff date (approximately 7 years 6 months)The PFS is defined as the time from the date of first dose of study drug to the date of first PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. For CLL/SLL, PD is defined as lympho \>= 50 % increase from baseline with \>= 5000 B lymphocytes/µL, progressive cytopenias by bone marrow biopsy, appearance of any new lesion or new appearance of hepatomegaly or splenomegaly or \>= 50 % increase in lymphadenopathy/hepatomegaly/splenomegaly, platelets decrease of \>= 50 % from baseline secondary to CLL or \< 100,000/µL and worsening bone marrow or Hb decrease of \> 2 g/dL from baseline secondary to CLL or decrease to less than 100 g/L and worsening bone marrow. For RS, PD is defined as an increase by 25 % in longest diameter, new lesion or assessable disease progression. The PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.

Countries

Italy, United Kingdom, United States

Contacts

STUDY_DIRECTORAcerta Clinical Trials

1-888-292-9613 acertamc@dlss.com

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Out of 306 enrolled participates, 5 participants were not treated with the study drug. The data of "All treated population" was collected and analyzed. The results data are reported per the primary completion date (data cut-off date of 15Jul2021). There will be no updated results for all outcome measures at the time of end of study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Relapsed/Refractory Cohort
Phase 1 (dose-escalation) and Phase 2 (dose-expansion) were conducted for participants with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). In Phase 1, participants received oral once daily (QD) acalabrutinib at Dose 1 (Cohort 1), Dose 2 (Cohort 2a), Dose 3 (Cohort 3), and Dose 4 (Cohort 4a), and twice daily (BID) acalabrutinib at Dose 1 (Cohort 2b) and Dose 5 (Cohort 4b) for 28 days (1 cycle). In Phase 2, participants received oral acalabrutinib at Dose 1 BID (Cohort 2b) or Dose 5 QD (Cohort 2c, later switched to Dose 1 BID per protocol amendment 6) until disease progression or until the investigator considered the study treatment to be intolerable or no longer in the participant's best interest. Participants from Phase 1 continued to receive Dose 1 BID until disease progression or until the investigator considered the study treatment to be intolerable or no longer in the participant's best interest.
134
Treatment-naive Cohort
Treatment-naïve participants with confirmed CLL or SLL, received oral acalabrutinib Dose 5 QD (Cohort 7, later switched to Dose 1 BID per protocol amendment 6) or Dose 1 BID (Cohort 11) until disease progression or until the investigator considered the study treatment to be intolerable or no longer in the participant's best interest.
99
Ibrutinib-intolerant Cohort
Participants with confirmed CLL or SLL and were not tolerating ibrutinib treatment, received oral acalabrutinib Dose 5 QD (Cohort 8a, later switched to Dose 1 BID per protocol amendment 4) or Dose 1 BID (Cohort 8b) until disease progression or until the investigator considered the study treatment to be intolerable or no longer in the participant's best interest.
33
Richters Syndrome/Prolymphocytic Leukemia Transformation Cohort
Participants with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) Richter's transformation (RS) or prolymphocytic leukemia transformation (PLL), received oral acalabrutinib Dose 5 BID (Cohort 9) until disease progression or until the investigator considered the study treatment to be intolerable or no longer in the participant's best interest.
29
Ibrutinib Relapsed/Refractory Cohort
Participants with confirmed CLL/SLL and had relapsed/refractory to ibrutinib treatment, received oral acalabrutinib Dose 5 QD (Cohort 10) until disease progression or until the investigator considered the study treatment to be intolerable or no longer in the participant's best interest.
6
Total301

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRelapsed/Refractory CohortTreatment-naive CohortIbrutinib-intolerant CohortRichters Syndrome/Prolymphocytic Leukemia Transformation CohortIbrutinib Relapsed/Refractory CohortTotal
Age, Continuous65.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2
63.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7
63.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9
65.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6
62.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.9
64.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.33
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants3 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
129 Participants94 Participants33 Participants28 Participants6 Participants290 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
6 Participants5 Participants2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants15 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
6 Participants4 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants11 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
120 Participants88 Participants31 Participants27 Participants5 Participants271 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
35 Participants33 Participants13 Participants14 Participants3 Participants98 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
99 Participants66 Participants20 Participants15 Participants3 Participants203 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
13 / 1342 / 992 / 3311 / 292 / 6
other
Total, other adverse events
134 / 13499 / 9933 / 3328 / 296 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
86 / 13450 / 9920 / 3318 / 293 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) of Acalabrutinib

The CL/F of acalabrutinib is reported.

Time frame: Predose and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours postdose on Day 1 and Day 8

Population: The PK population included all participants who complied with the protocol sufficiently and displayed an evaluable PK profile (e.g. exposure to treatment, availability and integrity of measurements, and absence of major protocol violations). 'Number of participants analyzed' denotes the number of participants evaluated for this outcome measure. 'Number analyzed' denotes the number of participants evaluated for the specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) of AcalabrutinibDay 1114 L/hrStandard Deviation 44.4
Cohort 1Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) of AcalabrutinibDay 8176 L/hrStandard Deviation 62.1
Cohort 2aApparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) of AcalabrutinibDay 1193 L/hrStandard Deviation 121
Cohort 2aApparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) of AcalabrutinibDay 8216 L/hrStandard Deviation 154
Cohort 2bApparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) of AcalabrutinibDay 1212 L/hrStandard Deviation 302
Cohort 2bApparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) of AcalabrutinibDay 8162 L/hrStandard Deviation 141
Cohort 3Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) of AcalabrutinibDay 1112 L/hrStandard Deviation 98.4
Cohort 3Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) of AcalabrutinibDay 8122 L/hrStandard Deviation 55.5
Cohort 4aApparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) of AcalabrutinibDay 8131 L/hrStandard Deviation 70.3
Cohort 4aApparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) of AcalabrutinibDay 1265 L/hrStandard Deviation 263
Cohort 4bApparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) of AcalabrutinibDay 8344 L/hrStandard Deviation 242
Cohort 4bApparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) of AcalabrutinibDay 1169 L/hrStandard Deviation 123
Cohort 4bApparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) of AcalabrutinibDay 1108 L/hrStandard Deviation 32
Cohort 4bApparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) of AcalabrutinibDay 8191 L/hrStandard Deviation 180
Cohort 7Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) of AcalabrutinibDay 1315 L/hrStandard Deviation 488
Cohort 7Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) of AcalabrutinibDay 8389 L/hrStandard Deviation 1070
Cohort 8aApparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) of AcalabrutinibDay 1352 L/hrStandard Deviation 43.7
Cohort 8aApparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) of AcalabrutinibDay 894.5 L/hr
Cohort 8bApparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) of AcalabrutinibDay 8336 L/hrStandard Deviation 258
Cohort 8bApparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) of AcalabrutinibDay 1311 L/hrStandard Deviation 166
Cohort 9Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) of AcalabrutinibDay 8132 L/hrStandard Deviation 51.8
Cohort 9Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) of AcalabrutinibDay 1142 L/hrStandard Deviation 88.9
Cohort 10Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) of AcalabrutinibDay 1156 L/hrStandard Deviation 40.3
Cohort 10Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) of AcalabrutinibDay 8167 L/hrStandard Deviation 95.1
Cohort 11Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) of AcalabrutinibDay 8188 L/hrStandard Deviation 92.5
Cohort 11Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) of AcalabrutinibDay 1137 L/hrStandard Deviation 77.4
Primary

Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of Acalabrutinib

The Vz/F of acalabrutinib is reported.

Time frame: Predose and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours postdose on Day 1 and Day 8

Population: The PK population included all participants who complied with the protocol sufficiently and displayed an evaluable PK profile (e.g. exposure to treatment, availability and integrity of measurements, and absence of major protocol violations). 'Number of participants analyzed' denotes the number of participants evaluated for this outcome measure. 'Number analyzed' denotes the number of participants evaluated for the specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of AcalabrutinibDay 8286 LStandard Deviation 150
Cohort 1Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of AcalabrutinibDay 1268 LStandard Deviation 332
Cohort 2aApparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of AcalabrutinibDay 1574 LStandard Deviation 992
Cohort 2aApparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of AcalabrutinibDay 8302 LStandard Deviation 238
Cohort 2bApparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of AcalabrutinibDay 1450 LStandard Deviation 1250
Cohort 2bApparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of AcalabrutinibDay 8333 LStandard Deviation 729
Cohort 3Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of AcalabrutinibDay 1182 LStandard Deviation 230
Cohort 3Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of AcalabrutinibDay 8165 LStandard Deviation 104
Cohort 4aApparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of AcalabrutinibDay 8172 LStandard Deviation 114
Cohort 4aApparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of AcalabrutinibDay 12100 LStandard Deviation 3290
Cohort 4bApparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of AcalabrutinibDay 8739 LStandard Deviation 745
Cohort 4bApparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of AcalabrutinibDay 11480 LStandard Deviation 2850
Cohort 4bApparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of AcalabrutinibDay 8384 LStandard Deviation 466
Cohort 4bApparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of AcalabrutinibDay 1133 LStandard Deviation 30
Cohort 7Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of AcalabrutinibDay 81180 LStandard Deviation 4940
Cohort 7Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of AcalabrutinibDay 1930 LStandard Deviation 1750
Cohort 8aApparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of AcalabrutinibDay 12600 LStandard Deviation 2030
Cohort 8aApparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of AcalabrutinibDay 8125 L
Cohort 8bApparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of AcalabrutinibDay 8726 LStandard Deviation 814
Cohort 8bApparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of AcalabrutinibDay 1422 LStandard Deviation 290
Cohort 9Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of AcalabrutinibDay 1171 LStandard Deviation 125
Cohort 9Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of AcalabrutinibDay 8179 LStandard Deviation 134
Cohort 10Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of AcalabrutinibDay 1235 LStandard Deviation 105
Cohort 10Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of AcalabrutinibDay 8533 LStandard Deviation 716
Cohort 11Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of AcalabrutinibDay 1158 LStandard Deviation 102
Cohort 11Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of AcalabrutinibDay 8234 LStandard Deviation 162
Primary

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours (AUC0-6) of Acalabrutinib

The AUC0-6 of acalabrutinib is reported.

Time frame: Predose and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours postdose on Day 1 and Day 8

Population: Pharmacokinetic (PK) population included all participants who complied with the protocol sufficiently and displayed an evaluable PK profile (e.g. exposure to treatment, availability and integrity of measurements, and absence of major protocol violations). 'Number of participants analyzed' denotes the number of participants evaluated for this outcome measure. 'Number analyzed' denotes the number of participants evaluated for the specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours (AUC0-6) of AcalabrutinibDay 1971 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 564
Cohort 1Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours (AUC0-6) of AcalabrutinibDay 8631 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 193
Cohort 2aArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours (AUC0-6) of AcalabrutinibDay 11250 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 836
Cohort 2aArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours (AUC0-6) of AcalabrutinibDay 81180 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 859
Cohort 2bArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours (AUC0-6) of AcalabrutinibDay 1819 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 493
Cohort 2bArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours (AUC0-6) of AcalabrutinibDay 8858 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 419
Cohort 3Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours (AUC0-6) of AcalabrutinibDay 12170 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 1180
Cohort 3Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours (AUC0-6) of AcalabrutinibDay 81660 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 554
Cohort 4aArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours (AUC0-6) of AcalabrutinibDay 81750 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 518
Cohort 4aArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours (AUC0-6) of AcalabrutinibDay 11880 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 1810
Cohort 4bArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours (AUC0-6) of AcalabrutinibDay 81630 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 1050
Cohort 4bArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours (AUC0-6) of AcalabrutinibDay 12960 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 1570
Cohort 4bArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours (AUC0-6) of AcalabrutinibDay 11950 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 487
Cohort 4bArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours (AUC0-6) of AcalabrutinibDay 81690 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 1090
Cohort 7Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours (AUC0-6) of AcalabrutinibDay 11740 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 1540
Cohort 7Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours (AUC0-6) of AcalabrutinibDay 81480 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 986
Cohort 8aArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours (AUC0-6) of AcalabrutinibDay 1362 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 221
Cohort 8aArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours (AUC0-6) of AcalabrutinibDay 82080 hr*ng/mL
Cohort 8bArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours (AUC0-6) of AcalabrutinibDay 8834 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 713
Cohort 8bArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours (AUC0-6) of AcalabrutinibDay 1670 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 471
Cohort 9Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours (AUC0-6) of AcalabrutinibDay 81860 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 786
Cohort 9Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours (AUC0-6) of AcalabrutinibDay 11690 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 849
Cohort 10Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours (AUC0-6) of AcalabrutinibDay 11100 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 590
Cohort 10Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours (AUC0-6) of AcalabrutinibDay 81250 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 1050
Cohort 11Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours (AUC0-6) of AcalabrutinibDay 8642 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 310
Cohort 11Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours (AUC0-6) of AcalabrutinibDay 1789 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 398
Primary

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Acalabrutinib

The AUC0-inf of Acalabrutinib is reported.

Time frame: Predose and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours postdose on Day 1 and Day 8

Population: The PK population included all participants who complied with the protocol sufficiently and displayed an evaluable PK profile (e.g. exposure to treatment, availability and integrity of measurements, and absence of major protocol violations). 'Number of participants analyzed' denotes the number of participants evaluated for this outcome measure. 'Number analyzed' denotes the number of participants evaluated for the specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of AcalabrutinibDay 11040 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 534
Cohort 1Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of AcalabrutinibDay 8621 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 187
Cohort 2aArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of AcalabrutinibDay 11320 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 827
Cohort 2aArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of AcalabrutinibDay 81200 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 865
Cohort 2bArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of AcalabrutinibDay 1855 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 517
Cohort 2bArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of AcalabrutinibDay 8956 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 665
Cohort 3Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of AcalabrutinibDay 12440 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 1010
Cohort 3Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of AcalabrutinibDay 81990 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 1020
Cohort 4aArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of AcalabrutinibDay 82360 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 1210
Cohort 4aArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of AcalabrutinibDay 12050 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 1680
Cohort 4bArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of AcalabrutinibDay 81750 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 1140
Cohort 4bArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of AcalabrutinibDay 13250 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 1630
Cohort 4bArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of AcalabrutinibDay 11970 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 495
Cohort 4bArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of AcalabrutinibDay 81780 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 1230
Cohort 7Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of AcalabrutinibDay 11910 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 1530
Cohort 7Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of AcalabrutinibDay 81540 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 973
Cohort 8aArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of AcalabrutinibDay 1574 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 76.3
Cohort 8aArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of AcalabrutinibDay 82120 hr*ng/mL
Cohort 8bArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of AcalabrutinibDay 8963 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 728
Cohort 8bArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of AcalabrutinibDay 1801 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 410
Cohort 9Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of AcalabrutinibDay 81750 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 701
Cohort 9Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of AcalabrutinibDay 11770 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 776
Cohort 10Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of AcalabrutinibDay 11350 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 373
Cohort 10Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of AcalabrutinibDay 81580 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 1030
Cohort 11Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of AcalabrutinibDay 8652 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 298
Cohort 11Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of AcalabrutinibDay 1940 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 430
Primary

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-last) of Acalabrutinib

The AUC0-last of acalabrutinib is reported.

Time frame: Predose and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours postdose on Day 1 and Day 8

Population: The PK population included all participants who complied with the protocol sufficiently and displayed an evaluable PK profile (e.g. exposure to treatment, availability and integrity of measurements, and absence of major protocol violations). 'Number of participants analyzed' denotes the number of participants evaluated for this outcome measure. 'Number analyzed' denotes the number of participants evaluated for the specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-last) of AcalabrutinibDay 11030 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 529
Cohort 1Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-last) of AcalabrutinibDay 8729 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 380
Cohort 2aArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-last) of AcalabrutinibDay 11270 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 775
Cohort 2aArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-last) of AcalabrutinibDay 81180 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 861
Cohort 2bArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-last) of AcalabrutinibDay 1795 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 502
Cohort 2bArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-last) of AcalabrutinibDay 8850 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 660
Cohort 3Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-last) of AcalabrutinibDay 12280 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 1060
Cohort 3Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-last) of AcalabrutinibDay 81850 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 882
Cohort 4aArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-last) of AcalabrutinibDay 82020 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 1170
Cohort 4aArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-last) of AcalabrutinibDay 12030 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 1670
Cohort 4bArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-last) of AcalabrutinibDay 81750 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 979
Cohort 4bArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-last) of AcalabrutinibDay 13430 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 1640
Cohort 4bArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-last) of AcalabrutinibDay 11950 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 487
Cohort 4bArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-last) of AcalabrutinibDay 81560 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 1020
Cohort 7Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-last) of AcalabrutinibDay 11790 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 1470
Cohort 7Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-last) of AcalabrutinibDay 81400 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 929
Cohort 8aArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-last) of AcalabrutinibDay 1539 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 106
Cohort 8aArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-last) of AcalabrutinibDay 81180 hr*ng/mL
Cohort 8bArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-last) of AcalabrutinibDay 8748 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 701
Cohort 8bArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-last) of AcalabrutinibDay 1570 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 451
Cohort 9Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-last) of AcalabrutinibDay 81710 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 669
Cohort 9Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-last) of AcalabrutinibDay 11860 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 1570
Cohort 10Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-last) of AcalabrutinibDay 11100 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 590
Cohort 10Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-last) of AcalabrutinibDay 81260 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 1060
Cohort 11Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-last) of AcalabrutinibDay 8660 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 294
Cohort 11Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-last) of AcalabrutinibDay 1850 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 462
Primary

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Acalabrutinib

The Cmax of Acalabrutinib is reported.

Time frame: Predose and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours postdose on Day 1 and Day 8

Population: The PK population included all participants who complied with the protocol sufficiently and displayed an evaluable PK profile (e.g. exposure to treatment, availability and integrity of measurements, and absence of major protocol violations). 'Number of participants analyzed' denotes the number of participants evaluated for this outcome measure. 'Number analyzed' denotes the number of participants evaluated for the specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of AcalabrutinibDay 1685 ng/mLStandard Deviation 475
Cohort 1Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of AcalabrutinibDay 8521 ng/mLStandard Deviation 308
Cohort 2aMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of AcalabrutinibDay 1754 ng/mLStandard Deviation 540
Cohort 2aMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of AcalabrutinibDay 8805 ng/mLStandard Deviation 757
Cohort 2bMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of AcalabrutinibDay 1706 ng/mLStandard Deviation 499
Cohort 2bMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of AcalabrutinibDay 8812 ng/mLStandard Deviation 829
Cohort 3Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of AcalabrutinibDay 11950 ng/mLStandard Deviation 1460
Cohort 3Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of AcalabrutinibDay 81350 ng/mLStandard Deviation 809
Cohort 4aMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of AcalabrutinibDay 81350 ng/mLStandard Deviation 933
Cohort 4aMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of AcalabrutinibDay 11350 ng/mLStandard Deviation 1170
Cohort 4bMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of AcalabrutinibDay 8902 ng/mLStandard Deviation 638
Cohort 4bMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of AcalabrutinibDay 11550 ng/mLStandard Deviation 1230
Cohort 4bMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of AcalabrutinibDay 11600 ng/mLStandard Deviation 291
Cohort 4bMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of AcalabrutinibDay 81320 ng/mLStandard Deviation 1540
Cohort 7Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of AcalabrutinibDay 11390 ng/mLStandard Deviation 1260
Cohort 7Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of AcalabrutinibDay 81020 ng/mLStandard Deviation 747
Cohort 8aMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of AcalabrutinibDay 1206 ng/mLStandard Deviation 240
Cohort 8aMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of AcalabrutinibDay 8939 ng/mL
Cohort 8bMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of AcalabrutinibDay 8616 ng/mLStandard Deviation 660
Cohort 8bMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of AcalabrutinibDay 1554 ng/mLStandard Deviation 500
Cohort 9Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of AcalabrutinibDay 81460 ng/mLStandard Deviation 913
Cohort 9Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of AcalabrutinibDay 11190 ng/mLStandard Deviation 925
Cohort 10Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of AcalabrutinibDay 1727 ng/mLStandard Deviation 436
Cohort 10Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of AcalabrutinibDay 8610 ng/mLStandard Deviation 751
Cohort 11Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of AcalabrutinibDay 8633 ng/mLStandard Deviation 449
Cohort 11Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of AcalabrutinibDay 1930 ng/mLStandard Deviation 595
Primary

Number of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEs

Participants with clinically abnormal vital signs (blood pressure, respiratory rate, pulse rate, or body temperature) reported as TEAEs are reported.

Time frame: Day 1 through the final data cutoff date (approximately 7 years 6 months)

Population: All-treated population included all enrolled participants who received 1 or more doses of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsHyperpyrexia0 Participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsDyspnoea27 Participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsTachycardia3 Participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsBradycardia6 Participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsPyrexia39 Participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsHypothermia0 Participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsProcedural hypotension0 Participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsBlood pressure increased0 Participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsDyspnoea exertional5 Participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsHypertension30 Participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsHypotension7 Participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsOrthostatic hypotension0 Participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsEssential hypertension0 Participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsHypertensive crisis1 Participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsMalignant hypertension0 Participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsPalpitations13 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsBradycardia1 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsDyspnoea18 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsHypotension12 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsEssential hypertension0 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsOrthostatic hypotension5 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsPyrexia14 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsPalpitations4 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsHypothermia1 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsProcedural hypotension1 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsHyperpyrexia0 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsMalignant hypertension0 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsBlood pressure increased1 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsTachycardia8 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsDyspnoea exertional5 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsHypertensive crisis0 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsHypertension28 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsBradycardia0 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsTachycardia2 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsPalpitations0 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsDyspnoea exertional1 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsHypotension5 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsHypothermia0 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsEssential hypertension1 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsPyrexia10 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsBlood pressure increased0 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsOrthostatic hypotension1 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsHyperpyrexia0 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsDyspnoea6 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsHypertensive crisis0 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsHypertension6 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsMalignant hypertension0 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsProcedural hypotension0 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsHypertensive crisis0 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsPyrexia6 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsHyperpyrexia1 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsHypothermia0 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsPalpitations0 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsProcedural hypotension0 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsBlood pressure increased0 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsDyspnoea exertional0 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsMalignant hypertension1 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsHypertension1 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsHypotension1 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsOrthostatic hypotension0 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsEssential hypertension0 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsDyspnoea3 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsTachycardia3 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsBradycardia0 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsEssential hypertension0 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsBlood pressure increased0 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsMalignant hypertension0 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsHypertension0 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsPyrexia0 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsDyspnoea exertional1 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsDyspnoea2 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsProcedural hypotension0 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsBradycardia0 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsTachycardia0 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsHypothermia0 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsHypertensive crisis0 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsOrthostatic hypotension0 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsPalpitations0 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsHypotension2 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsHyperpyrexia0 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or More

Participants with clinically important laboratory abnormalities with CTCAE Grade 3 or more are reported. Laboratory analysis included hematology, clinical chemistry, amylase, lipase, cardiac troponin I, hepatitis B and C testing, and urinalysis. The CTCAE version 4.03 is a descriptive terminology is used for AE reporting. The CTCAE v4.03 displays Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: Grade 3 as severe AE, Grade 4 as life-threatening or disabling AE, and Grade 5 as death related to AE.

Time frame: Day 1 through the final data cutoff date (approximately 7 years 6 months)

Population: All-treated population included all enrolled participants who received 1 or more doses of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreSodium (decreased)12 Participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreCalcium (increased)5 Participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreUrate (increased)24 Participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreBilirubin (increased)2 Participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreCalcium (decreased)2 Participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreAlanine aminotransferase (increased)3 Participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreLeukocytes (increased)29 Participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreAlbumin (decreased)2 Participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreAbsolute lymphocyte count (increased)29 Participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreAbsolute neutrophil count (decreased)57 Participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreCreatinine (increased)2 Participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreAbsolute lymphocyte count (decreased)20 Participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreLipase (increased)1 Participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MorePotassium (increased)3 Participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreHemoglobin, platelets or neutrophils decreased72 Participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MorePlatelets (decreased)20 Participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MorePhosphate (decreased)9 Participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreAlkaline phosphatase (increased)1 Participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreHemoglobin (decreased)17 Participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreGlucose (increased)3 Participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MorePotassium (decreased)2 Participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreMagnesium (increased)2 Participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreAmylase (increased)2 Participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreAspartate aminotransferase (increased)2 Participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreLeukocytes (decreased)12 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreGlucose (increased)1 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreCalcium (decreased)0 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MorePotassium (increased)5 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreUrate (increased)15 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreAlbumin (decreased)1 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreSodium (decreased)5 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreAmylase (increased)0 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreAlkaline phosphatase (increased)0 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MorePhosphate (decreased)1 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MorePlatelets (decreased)3 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreLeukocytes (decreased)2 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreAbsolute lymphocyte count (increased)8 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreCreatinine (increased)0 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreLeukocytes (increased)21 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreAbsolute lymphocyte count (decreased)7 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreHemoglobin, platelets or neutrophils decreased30 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreLipase (increased)1 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreBilirubin (increased)0 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreAlanine aminotransferase (increased)1 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreAbsolute neutrophil count (decreased)23 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreCalcium (increased)0 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreAspartate aminotransferase (increased)2 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreMagnesium (increased)2 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MorePotassium (decreased)1 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreHemoglobin (decreased)5 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreAlanine aminotransferase (increased)1 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreHemoglobin (decreased)3 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreAbsolute lymphocyte count (increased)7 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreLeukocytes (decreased)3 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MorePotassium (decreased)0 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreCalcium (increased)0 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreAbsolute neutrophil count (decreased)11 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreAmylase (increased)0 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreCreatinine (increased)0 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreUrate (increased)8 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreAspartate aminotransferase (increased)0 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MorePotassium (increased)1 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreAlbumin (decreased)0 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MorePlatelets (decreased)4 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreGlucose (increased)3 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreMagnesium (increased)0 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreHemoglobin, platelets or neutrophils decreased14 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreLipase (increased)0 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreCalcium (decreased)0 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreBilirubin (increased)0 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreAbsolute lymphocyte count (decreased)2 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreAlkaline phosphatase (increased)0 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreSodium (decreased)2 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreLeukocytes (increased)7 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MorePhosphate (decreased)1 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreAlkaline phosphatase (increased)1 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreGlucose (increased)0 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreAbsolute neutrophil count (decreased)13 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreHemoglobin (decreased)8 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MorePlatelets (decreased)5 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreLeukocytes (decreased)6 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreLeukocytes (increased)0 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreHemoglobin, platelets or neutrophils decreased19 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MorePhosphate (decreased)1 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreAbsolute lymphocyte count (decreased)6 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreAlanine aminotransferase (increased)1 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreCalcium (increased)1 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreAspartate aminotransferase (increased)0 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreMagnesium (increased)0 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MorePotassium (decreased)1 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreAlbumin (decreased)0 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreAbsolute lymphocyte count (increased)3 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreUrate (increased)5 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreSodium (decreased)3 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreCalcium (decreased)1 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MorePotassium (increased)0 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreAmylase (increased)0 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreBilirubin (increased)0 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreCreatinine (increased)0 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreLipase (increased)0 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreAbsolute lymphocyte count (increased)1 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreAlbumin (decreased)0 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MorePotassium (decreased)0 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreGlucose (increased)0 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreMagnesium (increased)0 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreAspartate aminotransferase (increased)0 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreCalcium (increased)0 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreHemoglobin, platelets or neutrophils decreased4 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreAmylase (increased)0 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreAlanine aminotransferase (increased)0 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreAbsolute lymphocyte count (decreased)0 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MorePhosphate (decreased)0 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreAlkaline phosphatase (increased)0 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreBilirubin (increased)0 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreLeukocytes (increased)2 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreLeukocytes (decreased)0 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MorePlatelets (decreased)1 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreHemoglobin (decreased)3 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreLipase (increased)0 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreCreatinine (increased)0 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreSodium (decreased)0 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreCalcium (decreased)0 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreUrate (increased)2 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MoreAbsolute neutrophil count (decreased)3 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Clinically Important Laboratory Abnormalities With Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 or MorePotassium (increased)0 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) in Phase 1

Participants with DLTs in Phase 1 are reported. The DLT was defined as any of the following events unless the adverse event is clearly related to disease progression or the participant's current medical history and associated comorbidities: (1) Any Grade 3 or greater nonhematologic toxicity with the exceptions of alopecia and Grade 3 nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea that respond to supportive therapy; (2) Hematologic toxicities including Grade 4 neutropenia lasting more than 5 days, Grade 4 or Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding or any requirement for platelets transfusion, Grade 3 or greater febrile neutropenia (body temperature of 38.5 degrees Celsius or more), or Grade 4 anemia, unexplained by underlying disease; or (3) Dosing delay due to toxicity for \> 7 consecutive days.

Time frame: From Day 1 to Day 28 after first dose of study drug

Population: All-treated population included all participants enrolled in Phase 1 (dose-escalation) of the study, received 1 or more doses of study drug, and observed from Day 1 to Day 28 after first dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) in Phase 10 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) in Phase 10 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) in Phase 10 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) in Phase 10 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) in Phase 10 Participants
Cohort 4bNumber of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) in Phase 10 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. The TEAEs are defined as events present at baseline that worsened in intensity after administration of study drug or events absent at baseline that emerged after administration of study drug.

Time frame: Day 1 through the final data cutoff date (approximately 7 years 6 months)

Population: All-treated population included all enrolled participants who received 1 or more doses of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)Any TEAEs134 Participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)Any TESAEs86 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)Any TEAEs99 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)Any TESAEs50 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)Any TEAEs33 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)Any TESAEs20 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)Any TESAEs18 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)Any TEAEs28 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)Any TEAEs6 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)Any TESAEs3 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)

The treatment emergent ECI included the events identified based on preclinical findings, emerging data from clinical studies relating to acalabrutinib, and pharmacological effects of approved Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors and reported after the first dose of the study drug.

Time frame: Day 1 through the final data cutoff date (approximately 7 years 6 months)

Population: All-treated population included all enrolled participants who received 1 or more doses of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Hepatotoxicity4 Participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Interstitial lung disease/Pneumonitis1 Participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Tumor lysis syndrome1 Participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Neutropenia26 Participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Second primary malignancies, excluding non-melanoma skin23 Participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Atrial fibrillation12 Participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Infections118 Participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Major hemorrhage11 Participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Other Leukopenia2 Participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Anemia22 Participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Ventricular tachyarrhythmias2 Participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Hypertension31 Participants
Cohort 1Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Thrombocytopenia10 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Hepatotoxicity4 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Thrombocytopenia1 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Major hemorrhage8 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Ventricular tachyarrhythmias0 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Second primary malignancies, excluding non-melanoma skin14 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Interstitial lung disease/Pneumonitis3 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Anemia10 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Atrial fibrillation6 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Infections86 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Neutropenia9 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Hypertension29 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Other Leukopenia1 Participants
Cohort 2aNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Tumor lysis syndrome0 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Ventricular tachyarrhythmias0 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Atrial fibrillation4 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Anemia4 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Neutropenia5 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Other Leukopenia1 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Thrombocytopenia4 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Major hemorrhage4 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Hepatotoxicity1 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Hypertension7 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Infections25 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Interstitial lung disease/Pneumonitis0 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Second primary malignancies, excluding non-melanoma skin3 Participants
Cohort 2bNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Tumor lysis syndrome0 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Hepatotoxicity3 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Other Leukopenia0 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Hypertension2 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Neutropenia13 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Infections18 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Anemia10 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Atrial fibrillation3 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Interstitial lung disease/Pneumonitis0 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Ventricular tachyarrhythmias0 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Tumor lysis syndrome0 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Major hemorrhage0 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Thrombocytopenia4 Participants
Cohort 3Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Second primary malignancies, excluding non-melanoma skin1 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Ventricular tachyarrhythmias0 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Hepatotoxicity0 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Thrombocytopenia0 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Neutropenia1 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Second primary malignancies, excluding non-melanoma skin0 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Major hemorrhage1 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Hypertension0 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Interstitial lung disease/Pneumonitis0 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Anemia1 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Atrial fibrillation0 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Other Leukopenia0 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Infections4 Participants
Cohort 4aNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Events of Clinical Interest (ECI)Tumor lysis syndrome0 Participants
Primary

Terminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2) of Acalabrutinib

The t1/2 of acalabrutinib is reported.

Time frame: Predose and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours postdose on Day 1 and Day 8

Population: The PK population included all participants who complied with the protocol sufficiently and displayed an evaluable PK profile (e.g. exposure to treatment, availability and integrity of measurements, and absence of major protocol violations). 'Number of participants analyzed' denotes the number of participants evaluated for this outcome measure. 'Number analyzed' denotes the number of participants evaluated for the specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1Terminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2) of AcalabrutinibDay 11.48 HoursStandard Deviation 1.5
Cohort 1Terminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2) of AcalabrutinibDay 81.09 HoursStandard Deviation 0.216
Cohort 2aTerminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2) of AcalabrutinibDay 11.44 HoursStandard Deviation 1.6
Cohort 2aTerminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2) of AcalabrutinibDay 80.942 HoursStandard Deviation 0.107
Cohort 2bTerminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2) of AcalabrutinibDay 10.914 HoursStandard Deviation 0.452
Cohort 2bTerminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2) of AcalabrutinibDay 80.995 HoursStandard Deviation 0.621
Cohort 3Terminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2) of AcalabrutinibDay 10.993 HoursStandard Deviation 0.303
Cohort 3Terminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2) of AcalabrutinibDay 80.902 HoursStandard Deviation 0.187
Cohort 4aTerminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2) of AcalabrutinibDay 80.886 HoursStandard Deviation 0.131
Cohort 4aTerminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2) of AcalabrutinibDay 12.89 HoursStandard Deviation 3.12
Cohort 4bTerminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2) of AcalabrutinibDay 81.38 HoursStandard Deviation 0.546
Cohort 4bTerminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2) of AcalabrutinibDay 13.52 HoursStandard Deviation 4.93
Cohort 4bTerminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2) of AcalabrutinibDay 10.869 HoursStandard Deviation 0.0811
Cohort 4bTerminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2) of AcalabrutinibDay 81.13 HoursStandard Deviation 0.408
Cohort 7Terminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2) of AcalabrutinibDay 11.41 HoursStandard Deviation 1.73
Cohort 7Terminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2) of AcalabrutinibDay 81.02 HoursStandard Deviation 0.454
Cohort 8aTerminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2) of AcalabrutinibDay 14.83 HoursStandard Deviation 3.69
Cohort 8aTerminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2) of AcalabrutinibDay 80.914 Hours
Cohort 8bTerminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2) of AcalabrutinibDay 81.25 HoursStandard Deviation 0.494
Cohort 8bTerminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2) of AcalabrutinibDay 10.900 HoursStandard Deviation 0.14
Cohort 9Terminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2) of AcalabrutinibDay 80.867 HoursStandard Deviation 0.289
Cohort 9Terminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2) of AcalabrutinibDay 10.798 HoursStandard Deviation 0.0973
Cohort 10Terminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2) of AcalabrutinibDay 11.01 HoursStandard Deviation 0.209
Cohort 10Terminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2) of AcalabrutinibDay 81.67 HoursStandard Deviation 1.41
Cohort 11Terminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2) of AcalabrutinibDay 80.811 HoursStandard Deviation 0.174
Cohort 11Terminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2) of AcalabrutinibDay 10.781 HoursStandard Deviation 0.137
Primary

Terminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz) of Acalabrutinib

The λz of acalabrutinib is reported.

Time frame: Predose and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours postdose on Day 1 and Day 8

Population: The PK population included all participants who complied with the protocol sufficiently and displayed an evaluable PK profile (e.g. exposure to treatment, availability and integrity of measurements, and absence of major protocol violations). 'Number of participants analyzed' denotes the number of participants evaluated for this outcome measure. 'Number analyzed' denotes the number of participants evaluated for the specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1Terminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz) of AcalabrutinibDay 10.679 1/hrStandard Deviation 0.276
Cohort 1Terminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz) of AcalabrutinibDay 80.655 1/hrStandard Deviation 0.132
Cohort 2aTerminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz) of AcalabrutinibDay 10.750 1/hrStandard Deviation 0.307
Cohort 2aTerminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz) of AcalabrutinibDay 80.744 1/hrStandard Deviation 0.0866
Cohort 2bTerminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz) of AcalabrutinibDay 10.848 1/hrStandard Deviation 0.214
Cohort 2bTerminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz) of AcalabrutinibDay 80.793 1/hrStandard Deviation 0.191
Cohort 3Terminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz) of AcalabrutinibDay 10.755 1/hrStandard Deviation 0.209
Cohort 3Terminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz) of AcalabrutinibDay 80.798 1/hrStandard Deviation 0.161
Cohort 4aTerminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz) of AcalabrutinibDay 80.797 1/hrStandard Deviation 0.128
Cohort 4aTerminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz) of AcalabrutinibDay 10.502 1/hrStandard Deviation 0.3
Cohort 4bTerminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz) of AcalabrutinibDay 80.578 1/hrStandard Deviation 0.243
Cohort 4bTerminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz) of AcalabrutinibDay 10.557 1/hrStandard Deviation 0.386
Cohort 4bTerminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz) of AcalabrutinibDay 10.804 1/hrStandard Deviation 0.0793
Cohort 4bTerminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz) of AcalabrutinibDay 80.679 1/hrStandard Deviation 0.251
Cohort 7Terminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz) of AcalabrutinibDay 10.756 1/hrStandard Deviation 0.292
Cohort 7Terminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz) of AcalabrutinibDay 80.745 1/hrStandard Deviation 0.174
Cohort 8aTerminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz) of AcalabrutinibDay 10.373 1/hrStandard Deviation 0.468
Cohort 8aTerminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz) of AcalabrutinibDay 80.758 1/hr
Cohort 8bTerminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz) of AcalabrutinibDay 80.623 1/hrStandard Deviation 0.218
Cohort 8bTerminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz) of AcalabrutinibDay 10.784 1/hrStandard Deviation 0.112
Cohort 9Terminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz) of AcalabrutinibDay 80.857 1/hrStandard Deviation 0.209
Cohort 9Terminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz) of AcalabrutinibDay 10.880 1/hrStandard Deviation 0.114
Cohort 10Terminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz) of AcalabrutinibDay 10.706 1/hrStandard Deviation 0.144
Cohort 10Terminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz) of AcalabrutinibDay 80.603 1/hrStandard Deviation 0.324
Cohort 11Terminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz) of AcalabrutinibDay 80.894 1/hrStandard Deviation 0.204
Cohort 11Terminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz) of AcalabrutinibDay 10.916 1/hrStandard Deviation 0.177
Primary

Time of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Acalabrutinib

The Tmax of Acalabrutinib is reported.

Time frame: Predose and at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours postdose on Day 1 and Day 8

Population: The PK population included all participants who complied with the protocol sufficiently and displayed an evaluable PK profile (e.g. exposure to treatment, availability and integrity of measurements, and absence of major protocol violations). 'Number of participants analyzed' denotes the number of participants evaluated for this outcome measure. 'Number analyzed' denotes the number of participants evaluated for the specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort 1Time of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of AcalabrutinibDay 11.01 Hours
Cohort 1Time of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of AcalabrutinibDay 81.05 Hours
Cohort 2aTime of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of AcalabrutinibDay 10.917 Hours
Cohort 2aTime of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of AcalabrutinibDay 80.517 Hours
Cohort 2bTime of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of AcalabrutinibDay 10.750 Hours
Cohort 2bTime of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of AcalabrutinibDay 80.750 Hours
Cohort 3Time of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of AcalabrutinibDay 11.00 Hours
Cohort 3Time of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of AcalabrutinibDay 81.03 Hours
Cohort 4aTime of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of AcalabrutinibDay 81.00 Hours
Cohort 4aTime of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of AcalabrutinibDay 11.00 Hours
Cohort 4bTime of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of AcalabrutinibDay 80.700 Hours
Cohort 4bTime of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of AcalabrutinibDay 11.00 Hours
Cohort 4bTime of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of AcalabrutinibDay 10.758 Hours
Cohort 4bTime of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of AcalabrutinibDay 80.758 Hours
Cohort 7Time of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of AcalabrutinibDay 10.783 Hours
Cohort 7Time of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of AcalabrutinibDay 80.750 Hours
Cohort 8aTime of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of AcalabrutinibDay 11.30 Hours
Cohort 8aTime of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of AcalabrutinibDay 81.49 Hours
Cohort 8bTime of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of AcalabrutinibDay 80.908 Hours
Cohort 8bTime of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of AcalabrutinibDay 10.783 Hours
Cohort 9Time of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of AcalabrutinibDay 81.00 Hours
Cohort 9Time of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of AcalabrutinibDay 10.992 Hours
Cohort 10Time of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of AcalabrutinibDay 11.00 Hours
Cohort 10Time of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of AcalabrutinibDay 81.58 Hours
Cohort 11Time of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of AcalabrutinibDay 80.533 Hours
Cohort 11Time of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of AcalabrutinibDay 10.642 Hours
Secondary

Duration of Response (DOR) as Assessed by the Investigator

The DoR is defined as the time from the date of achieving the first CR, CRi, or PR to the date of progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. The CR, CRi, or PR are defined in the above outcome measure. For CLL/SLL, PD is defined as lympho \>=50% increase from baseline with \>= 5000 B lymphocytes/µL, progressive cytopenias by bone marrow biopsy, appearance of any new lesion or new appearance of hepatomegaly or splenomegaly or \>= 50 % increase in lymphadenopathy/hepatomegaly/splenomegaly, platelets decrease of \>=50% from baseline secondary to CLL or \< 100,000/µL and worsening bone marrow or Hb decrease of \> 2 g/dL from baseline secondary to CLL or decrease to less than 100 g/L and worsening bone marrow. For RS, PD is defined as an increase by 25 % in longest diameter, new lesion or assessable disease progression. The DoR was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: Day 1 through the final data cutoff date (approximately 7 years 6 months)

Population: Efficacy evaluable population included all enrolled participants who received 1 or more doses of study drug and had 1 or more response assessments after the first dose of study drug. The DoR was analyzed for participants who achieved OR.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort 1Duration of Response (DOR) as Assessed by the Investigator33.3 Months
Cohort 2aDuration of Response (DOR) as Assessed by the Investigator26.7 Months
Cohort 2bDuration of Response (DOR) as Assessed by the Investigator77.3 Months
Cohort 3Duration of Response (DOR) as Assessed by the Investigator43.0 Months
Cohort 4aDuration of Response (DOR) as Assessed by the InvestigatorNA Months
Cohort 4bDuration of Response (DOR) as Assessed by the Investigator64.1 Months
Cohort 4bDuration of Response (DOR) as Assessed by the InvestigatorNA Months
Cohort 7Duration of Response (DOR) as Assessed by the InvestigatorNA Months
Cohort 8aDuration of Response (DOR) as Assessed by the InvestigatorNA Months
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR) as Assessed by the Investigator

For CLL/SLL, OR is defined as complete remission (CR), CR with incomplete marrow recovery (CRi), or partial remission (PR). CR: lymphocytes (lympho) \<4×10\^9/L, normocellular bone marrow (BM), normal lymph nodes (NLN), liver and spleen (L/S), absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \>1.5×10\^9/L, platelets \>100×10\^9/L, hemoglobin (Hb) \>11g/dL. Cri: lympho \<4×10\^9/L, hypocellular BM, NLN, L/S, persistent anemia, hrombocytopenia, or neutropenia. PR: \>=50% reduction in lymphadenopathy and/or enlargement of L/S or lympho (\<5×10\^9/L or \>=50% decrease from baseline) and criteria of ANC/platelets/Hb per CR or \>=50% improvement over baseline. Hematology result were without exogenous growth factors/transfusion. For RS, OR as CR or PR by Cheson et al. 2014 based on PET/CT scans and bone marrow. CR: disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms and PR: \>=50% decrease in sum of the product diameter of 6 largest nodal masses and no new sites of disease.

Time frame: Day 1 through the final data cutoff date (approximately 7 years 6 months)

Population: Efficacy evaluable population included all enrolled participants who received 1 or more doses of study drug and had 1 or more response assessments after the first dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR) as Assessed by the Investigator100.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2aPercentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR) as Assessed by the Investigator75 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2bPercentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR) as Assessed by the Investigator92.1 Percentage of participants
Cohort 3Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR) as Assessed by the Investigator93.8 Percentage of participants
Cohort 4aPercentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR) as Assessed by the Investigator100.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 4bPercentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR) as Assessed by the Investigator100.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 4bPercentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR) as Assessed by the Investigator100.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 7Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR) as Assessed by the Investigator97.3 Percentage of participants
Cohort 8aPercentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR) as Assessed by the Investigator100.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Investigator

The PFS is defined as the time from the date of first dose of study drug to the date of first PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. For CLL/SLL, PD is defined as lympho \>= 50 % increase from baseline with \>= 5000 B lymphocytes/µL, progressive cytopenias by bone marrow biopsy, appearance of any new lesion or new appearance of hepatomegaly or splenomegaly or \>= 50 % increase in lymphadenopathy/hepatomegaly/splenomegaly, platelets decrease of \>= 50 % from baseline secondary to CLL or \< 100,000/µL and worsening bone marrow or Hb decrease of \> 2 g/dL from baseline secondary to CLL or decrease to less than 100 g/L and worsening bone marrow. For RS, PD is defined as an increase by 25 % in longest diameter, new lesion or assessable disease progression. The PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: Day 1 through the final data cutoff date (approximately 7 years 6 months)

Population: Efficacy evaluable population included all enrolled participants who received 1 or more doses of study drug and had 1 or more response assessments after the first dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort 1Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Investigator38.3 Months
Cohort 2aProgression Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Investigator33.1 Months
Cohort 2bProgression Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Investigator79.1 Months
Cohort 3Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Investigator46.6 Months
Cohort 4aProgression Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the InvestigatorNA Months
Cohort 4bProgression Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Investigator67.8 Months
Cohort 4bProgression Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the InvestigatorNA Months
Cohort 7Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the InvestigatorNA Months
Cohort 8aProgression Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the InvestigatorNA Months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 6, 2026