Skip to content

Safety and Effectiveness of the Ultrasonic Propulsion of Kidney Stones

Safety and Effectiveness of the Ultrasonic Propulsion of Kidney Stones

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02028559
Enrollment
172
Registered
2014-01-07
Start date
2013-12-17
Completion date
2026-05-31
Last updated
2026-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Kidney Stones, Nephrolithiasis, Urolithiasis

Keywords

stones, kidney, stone fragments, lithotripsy

Brief summary

This study tests moving kidney stones using focused ultrasound (referred to as ultrasonic propulsion). The study includes multiple population groups to investigate the ability of our technology to: a) move stone fragments to a location within the kidney to improve their chances of passage, and thus reduce the occurrence of additional symptomatic events and retreatment or b) move a symptomatic stone to relieve symptoms and pain.

Detailed description

This is an investigator initiated, NIH-funded study conducted by the University of Washington (UW). Our research group has developed a new, non-invasive technology using low intensity focused ultrasound to reposition kidney stones by imparting sufficient acoustic energy to physically move a stone. The focused ultrasound pulses are similar to pulses that may be used in elastography or acoustic radiation force imaging. Like conventional ultrasound, the probe is placed in contact with the patient's skin to image the stone following standard ultrasound imaging procedure. The same probe is then used to focus the ultrasound and apply a burst (a sequence of pulses) of acoustic force to push the stone. Brightness mode (B-mode) imaging is interleaved with the "pushing" pulses (Push-mode) to monitor stone movement. The user controls the burst amplitude. To limit heating at the probe surface, there is a slight delay before the operator can execute the next push. In addition to undergoing the investigational procedure, the research activities include the following: * subjects undergo a pain questionnaire before and after the procedure and report their current level of stone pain on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain); * the subject's skin in the area of probe placement is observed before and after the procedure; * subjects are contacted once-a-week for 3 weeks to evaluate for potential adverse events, pain medication use, and, if applicable, stone passage; * subjects are requested to undergo at least one follow-up imaging 4 - 12 weeks post-procedure; * a review of each subject's medical records is conducted 90-days post-procedure to evaluate for additional effectiveness and safety events. * Specifically for the residual fragment population (randomized control trial), subjects are contacted every 6 months for 3 years and their electronic medical record is reviewed for 5 years for stone growth, symptomatic, unscheduled medical visits, and surgery related to stones. Subjects that qualify for the trial are recruited into different study arms (referred to as Population groups) based on their type of stone condition (de novo stone versus post-lithotripsy fragment), size of stone (≤ 5 mm or \> 5 mm), and management plan (clinical observation or surgical intervention). The objectives vary based upon the Population group. Subjects may qualify for more than one population group and may undergo the investigational procedure up to 4 times total (inclusive of both the left and right-side urinary tracts). Subjects can only be enrolled in one population group at a time, there is a separate consent for each study population, and each study population is considered independent of the other groups. Recruitment into all population groups has been completed. 1. First-in-Human Population: This was the initial group of subjects included under this clinical trial. This was a 15-subject feasibility study that included a broad range of populations. This feasibility population formulated the basis for expanding the trial into a larger study addressing each population separately. This is encompassed in subject populations 2-5 below. 2. De Novo Small Stone Population: Subjects undergo the investigational procedure awake and in the clinic. To qualify the subject must have a de novo stone ≤ 5 mm in largest dimension. Ultrasonic propulsion is used with the intent to help facilitate stone passage. If the stone is larger than 5 mm, subjects could be recruited into the URS subject population (see bullet point #3 below). 3. Concurrent with URS Population: Subjects undergo the investigational procedure while anesthetized and concurrently undergoing a ureteroscopy guided laser lithotripsy procedure (referred to herein as URS). To qualify the subject must have at least one stone ≤ 20 mm in the largest dimension and be scheduled for surgery. Ultrasonic propulsion may be used to move a de novo stone or stone fragments of varying sizes generated over the course of the URS procedure. Note that since these subjects are anesthetized, a pain questionnaire is not included as part of their protocol. 4. Obstructing Stone Population: Subjects undergo the investigational procedure awake and in the clinic or emergency department (ED) setting. To qualify the subject must have clinical imaging confirmation of an obstructing stone with their pain managed and complete a urinalysis to for assess infection risk. Ultrasonic propulsion is used with the intent to relieve the obstruction and associated pain. A subset of subjects were exposed to higher amplitude dislodging pulses, in addition to the ultrasonic propulsion pulses. 5. Residual Fragment Population: Subjects undergo the investigational procedure awake and in the clinic setting. To qualify the subject must have at least one post-lithotripsy residual fragment (≤ 5 mm in largest dimension) identified either on imaging or based on the investigator's interpretation of that imaging. This is a prospective, open-label, multicenter, randomized control trial (RCT) with a treatment arm and control arm. The only difference in protocol between the two arms is that only the treatment group undergoes the investigational procedure and the associated post-procedure pain questionnaire and the post-procedure skin surface inspection. Ultrasonic propulsion is used with the intent to demonstrate: a) the ability of the ultrasonic propulsion device to reposition stones within the human kidney, b) the subsequent clinical benefit of facilitating stone passage and reducing stone burden, and c) the subsequent clinical benefit of reducing relapse. This is the only population group recruited across more than one site - the UW and the VA Puget Sound Healthcare System.

Interventions

DEVICEPropulse 1 with C5-2 probe

Move kidney stones with Propulse 1 device.

DEVICEPropulse 1 with SC-X probe

Move kidney stones with Propulse 1 device.

Sponsors

University of Washington
Lead SponsorOTHER
VA Puget Sound Health Care System
CollaboratorFED

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Outcome Assessors evaluating: a) imaging for stone growth, b) relatedness of safety events to the device/procedure or underlying stone condition, and c) relapse events, for the residual fragment (RCT) population are blind to the exposure condition.

Intervention model description

Population groups 1-4 are single groups. Subjects are assigned based upon their underlying stone condition and the stage of the trial. Subjects enrolled into the residual fragment population (group 5) are randomized between a treatment group and concurrent control group.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Individuals suspected of having at least one kidney stone. This includes: * Patients who are being managed with watchful waiting or medical therapy * Patients who recently (but \> 4 weeks) underwent lithotripsy treatment of their stones * Patients scheduled for lithotripsy treatment Or * Individuals suspected of having an obstructed stone. This includes: * Patients presenting with renal colic * Patients presenting with hydronephrosis or dilation of the ureter Primary

Exclusion criteria

for all groups: * Individuals under 18 years of age * Individuals with non-echogenic stones * Individuals unable or unwilling to comply with the follow-up requirements * Individuals with a coagulation abnormality or taking blood thinners or other anticoagulant at clinically significant levels * Individuals with mobility issues who are unable to comfortably lie for up to 30 minutes or roll from their back to their side * Individuals belonging to a vulnerable group (pregnant, mentally disabled, physically disabled, prisoner, etc.) * Individuals who have already received four previous ultrasonic propulsion procedures. * Individuals who have received an ultrasonic propulsion treatment within the last 4 weeks. Additional

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Measurement of Stone Motion Caused by UltrasoundAt the time of the procedure. To be evaluated with each therapy pulse over an approximately 1-hour study. Confirmed with post-procedure review of the study video.Percentage of study participants for which stone motion was observed on the real-time ultrasound images.
Measurement of Stone PassageMeasurement occurs over 3 weeks (weekly phone call or email encounter with the subject) plus review of the subject's medical chart up to the point the subject is exited from the study.The percentage of participants reporting visual observation of stone passage or confirmed with follow-up imaging. For the residual fragment RCT population specifically, the percentage of participants reporting visual observation of stone passage during the 3-week follow-up period after the procedure or randomization (Control group).
Measurement of RelapseMeasurement up to 5 years post-procedure. This includes a phone call or email exchange semi-annually for up to 3-years and a medical record review (including imaging) semi-annually for up to 5-years.The percentage of participants experiencing stone relapse defined as: an unscheduled, symptomatic visit for stones on the study side, surgery for stones on the study side, or stone growth of a residual fragment measured by clinical imaging exams. This measurement is specific to the residual fragment population and associated randomized control trial. Only a single relapse event is counted per participant, though a participant could experience more than one event.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJonathan Harper, MD

University of Washington

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited based on physician referral and identification of potential qualifying individuals through review of the clinic patient list. Participants were recruited between December of 2013 and July of 2024. The first participant was enrolled on December 17, 2013 and the last participant was enrolled on July 23, 2024.

Pre-assignment details

172 subjects are considered enrolled in this study for one of the groups defined below. 249 subjects were consented for the study. 77 subjects screen failed after consent but before undergoing any ultrasonic propulsion procedure. Since these subjects did not qualify for the study and were not assigned to an arm/group, they are not considered enrolled or included in the data provided below. The start of the study is defined as receiving at least one ultrasonic propulsion therapy pulse.

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Continuous56 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
Body-Mass Index (BMI)29.4 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.9
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
14 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
11 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
13 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
43 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
54 participants
Renal Side
Left
1 Participants
Renal Side
Right
68 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Ultrasonic Propulsion
Female
4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Ultrasonic Propulsion
Male
115 Participants
Target (Stone) Location
Distal Ureter / UVJ
0 Number of Targets (Stone)
Target (Stone) Location
Lower pole
24 Number of Targets (Stone)
Target (Stone) Location
Mid pole
78 Number of Targets (Stone)
Target (Stone) Location
Renal Pelvis / UPJ
7 Number of Targets (Stone)
Target (Stone) Location
Upper pole
4 Number of Targets (Stone)

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 150 / 20 / 180 / 160 / 131 / 543 / 54
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 150 / 22 / 181 / 166 / 1331 / 5420 / 54
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 150 / 21 / 181 / 160 / 130 / 540 / 54

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 2, 2026