Skip to content

Anterolateral Watson Jones Approach Versus Transgluteal Approach for Uncemented Hemi- Arthroplasty in Displaced Femoral Neck Fracture

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02028468
Enrollment
150
Registered
2014-01-07
Start date
2014-02-28
Completion date
2022-03-11
Last updated
2022-11-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Femoral Neck Fracture

Keywords

Femoral Neck Fracture, Anterolateral approach, Trans-gluteal approach, Watson Jones approach, Hardinge approach

Brief summary

Hemiarthroplasty is a well established treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures in the Elderly. During the last decade the use of Minimal Invasive Surgical( MIS) approaches have been increasing. Our hypothesis is that Patients with a Femoral Neck Fracture may benefit from a MIS approach.

Detailed description

The study's main objective: The purpose of the study is to test the following hypothesis. Patients 70 to 90 years with a displaced femoral neck fracture, operated with a hemiarthroplasty through an anterolateral approach, have less pain and better patient satisfaction as measured by PROMs than patients operated through the lateral approach. The study's subsidiary objectives. We aim to shed light on the following subsidiary hypotheses. 1. A hemiarthroplasty inserted through an anterolateral approach gives less bone resorption, as measured by DEXA around the stem, than a hemiarthroplasty inserted via a direct lateral approach. 2. A hemiarthroplasty inserted through an anterolateral approach causes lesser degree of muscle damage, as measured by CK, than a direct lateral approach

Interventions

PROCEDUREhemiarthroplasty

Sponsors

Sorlandet Hospital HF
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
70 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Patients 70- 85 Years of Age -

Exclusion criteria

Dementia, Infection Not Suitable for Hemiarthroplasty \-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Visual Analogue Scale Pain and Patient SatisfactionPre and postoperative, 3 and 12 Months

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Timed up and gopostoperative, 3 and 12 MonthesTUG test- Timed up and Go
Harris Hip ScorePre / Postoperative, 3 and 12 Months
Hip Osteoarthritis Disability ScorePostoperative, 3 and 12 Months
EuroQolPostoperative, 3 and 12 Months

Countries

Norway

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 6, 2026