Skip to content

Clinical Effectiveness of Various Professionally Applied Fluoride Prophylaxes in Groups at High Risk

Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing the Clinical Effectiveness of Various Professionally Applied Fluoride Prophylaxes in Deciduous Teeth in Groups at High Risk

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02027922
Enrollment
180
Registered
2014-01-06
Start date
2013-11-30
Completion date
2016-03-31
Last updated
2019-07-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Caries, White Spot Lesion

Keywords

white spot lesion, caries

Brief summary

The study is to compare the prophylactic and therapeutic clinical effectiveness of two fluoride varnishes in children at high caries risk. It was hypothesized, the use of Fluor Protector S (I) fluoride varnish in children with deciduous teeth at high risk of caries (P) reduces caries and the activity/remineralisation of carious enamel spots (transformation of White Spot Lesion into D (decay)) (O), similarly to what occurs after the use of Duraphat varnish (C).

Detailed description

The study is to compare the prophylactic and therapeutic clinical effectiveness of two fluoride varnishes in children at high caries risk. It was hypothesized, the use of Fluor Protector S (I) fluoride varnish in children with deciduous teeth at high risk of caries (P) reduces caries and the activity/remineralisation of carious enamel spots (transformation of White Spot Lesion into D (decay)) (O), similarly to what occurs after the use of Duraphat varnish (C). The question set bases on a Caries Assessment by Risk Management system basing on the occurrence of major caries causative agents (biological and medical), and also of the protective/preventive ones. Questions related to the social and economical status will be left out because of the difficulty of getting them answered honestly. Teeth will be scored according to International Caries Detection System II classification, and oral hygiene according to the Greene and Vermillion simplified Oral Hygiene Index (OHI-S) (1964). Children and their parents/guardians will receive hygienic, dietary and prophylactic guidelines.

Interventions

Fluor Protector S intervention group A (25 ml) Duraphat group B (25ml)

Sponsors

Medical University of Warsaw
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
3 Years to 5 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* generally healthy children aged 3-5 years * high risk of caries * parent/legal guardian consent for participation in research study

Exclusion criteria

* chronic diseases or medication in medical history * planned change of residence within a year * aged \<3, \>5 years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
the number of caries and white spot lesions in teeth treated with fluoride varnishes comparing to the control group.12 monthsThe primary outcome were caries prevalence and increment.The primary endpoint for each individual child is whether or not there has been any occurrence of new caries lesions over the 1 year period, as measured by any increase in d3mft at 1 years of follow up compared to the d3mft at baseline (d3mft is dental decay as measured by the dmft scale in the dentine)

Countries

Poland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026