Skip to content

A Comparison of Rate Response Performance in Pacemaker Patients With an Indication of Sinus Node Dysfunction

A Comparison of Rate Response Performance in Pacemaker Patients With an Indication of Sinus Node Dysfunction.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02027909
Acronym
CRIPS
Enrollment
8
Registered
2014-01-06
Start date
2011-11-30
Completion date
2015-04-30
Last updated
2018-04-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sinus Node Dysfunction

Keywords

Sinus Node Dysfunction

Brief summary

Providing ideal rate response to patients should improve their quality of life and ability to execute activities of daily living. Medtronic pacemakers provide rate response pacing by utilizing dual zone programming to specify an activities of daily living (ADL) response rate and an exertion response rate. There is much data to support the target heart rate for an exercise response but the data to support the programming of the ADL rate is lacking.

Detailed description

Medtronic pacemakers provide rate response pacing by utilizing dual zone programming to specify an activities of daily living (ADL) response rate and an exertion response rate. There is much data to support the target heart rate for an exercise response but the data to support the programming of the ADL rate is lacking. Unpublished Holter data from our center indicates that the ADL rate for most patients in our practice is between 50-70bpm rather than 95bpm. Moreover, this increased ADL rate may impact diastolic filling times and adversely impact cardiac output.

Interventions

DEVICEReprogramming dual chamber pacemaker

Reprogramming rate response feature in the Medtronic pacemaker to each arm with crossover

Sponsors

Medtronic
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Arun Rao
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to 95 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of hypertension * Sinus node dysfunction * New implantation of a dual chamber pacemaker due to symptomatic sinus dysfunction or chronotropic incompetence defined as exercise heart rate less than 100 beats per minute

Exclusion criteria

* Second or Third degree AV block * Age less than 60 or greater than 95 years * EF less than 45% * Patients that are not ambulatory * Persistent atrial fibrillation (atrial fibrillation lasting greater than 7 days) * Permanent atrial fibrillation (atrial fibrillation lasting great than 1 year)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
symptom improvementstudy duration of 9 mthsPatient report symptoms by clinician interview and patient symptom questionnaire

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
improvement seen on device interrogations and reported improvement of symptomsstudy duration of 9 mthsTwo minute hall walk distance Heart rate histograms and sensor indicated rate profile obtained from device interrogation Patient reported symptoms Patient symptom questionnaire Quality of life as measured by SF-36

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026