Skip to content

Etomidate vs. Midazolam for Sedation During ERCP

Etomidate With Meperidine vs Midazolam With Meperidine for Sedation During Endodscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatogram (ERCP)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02027311
Enrollment
63
Registered
2014-01-06
Start date
2013-04-30
Completion date
2013-08-31
Last updated
2015-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cholangiocarcinoma, Choledocholithiasis, Pancreatic Cancer, Pancreatitis

Keywords

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), Conscious Sedation, etomidate, midazolam

Brief summary

Recently up-coming drug, etomidate which is a modulator of GABA(gamma-Aminobutyric acid)-A receptor has been known that it maintains the appropriate sedative levels and affects little effects on respiratory system. The investigators are now trying to investigate that etomidate with meperidine combination regimen is superior to the midazolam with meperidine more effective and less harm on sedation during the ERCP procedure.

Detailed description

ERCP (Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogram) is an uncomfortable and time-consuming procedure compared to other endoscopic procedures. Most ERCP procedure had been performed in sedation using tranquilizers and pain-killers. Until recently, midazolam and opioid combination regimen recognized as a standard therapy is widely used, but the sedative effect is insufficient and intermittent paradoxical reaction has been questioned. Another drug, such as propofol, has been known that the sedative effect is superior one of the midazolam but disappointed due to narrow therapeutic range of respiratory distress and absence of antagonist. Meanwhile, recently up-coming drug, etomidate which is a modulator of GABA-A receptor has been known that it maintains the appropriate sedative levels and affects little effects on respiratory system. For these advantages, this short acting sedative drug has been widely used in the emergency room during minor operation and in the operation room for induction. However, research on the efficacy during ERCP was not yet published. In this regards, the purpose of the investigators study is to prove the efficacy of etomidate for sedation and to establish new evidence based sedation guidelines during ERCP procedure.

Interventions

DRUGEtomidate

This cohort would be administered etomidate with meperidine. The initial dose of etomidate is 0.1mg/kg IV and meperidine, 25mg. Additional dose of etomidate is 2mg(1cc). In old age cased, more than 65 years old, 30% of initial dose discounted.

DRUGMidazolam

This cohort would be administered midazolam with meperidine. The initial dose of midazolam is 0.06mg/kg IV and meperidine 50mg IV. Additional dose is 1mg of midazolam. In the elders, more than 65 years old, initial dose was declined to 70%.

DRUGMeperidine

Both groups were administered same dose of meperidinie 50mg. Then elders \> 80 years old were administered 25mg iv bolus.

Sponsors

Cheju Halla General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All patients who are scheduled diagnositic or therapeutic ERCP. * Age : more than 20 and less than 90 years old * ASA(American Society of Anesthesiologists) classificiation : I, II, III

Exclusion criteria

Patients following * Refuse to be enrolled * ASA American Society of Anesthesiologists)classification IV, V * Breast feeder * The mentally ill * Drug abuser * Hypersensitivity to sedative or opioids * Alcohol intoxication or dependency * Body mass index (BMI) 36kg/m2 or more * Unstable vital sign 1. tachypnea, respiration rate more than 25/min or less than 10/min 2. Oxygen saturation : 90% or less 3. Systolic blood pressure : less than 90 mmHg or more than 180 mmHg 4. Diastolic blood pressure : less than 50 mmHg or more than 100 mmHg 5. Heart rate : more than 120 beat/min or less than 50 beat/min.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of InterventionThroughout the whole ERCP procedureThe frequency of intervention which was defined as any restraint of the patient's head, arms, or legs if they became agitated, or if patient movement was not controlled with verbal instruction from the endoscopist during the whole intraoperative phases.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Event of HypoxiaEvery 5min in Preoperative, intraoperative phase and 15 min in Recovery phaseHypoxia defined as peripheral blood oxygen saturation measured by pulse oxymeter \< 90%

Countries

South Korea

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Eligibility was evaluated for all patients with a scheduled ERCP procedure in the Cheju Halla General Hospital during the study period from May 15 2013 to Aug 19 2013. Sample size estimated 26 of each groups for reject null hypothesis with probability (power) 0.8 and Type I error is 0.05.

Pre-assignment details

68 patients were enrolled and 35 were assigned in the MDZ group and 33 were in the ETM group. In ETM group, 1 case was dropped due to hypotension and 2 were desaturation. And 1 cases was dropped due to tachycardia and 1 were desaturation in MDZ group.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Etomidate
This cohort would be administered etomidate with meperidine. The initial dose of etomidate is 0.1mg/kg IV and meperidine, 25mg. Additional dose of etomidate is 2mg(1cc). In old age cased, more than 65 years old, 30% of initial dose discounted. Etomidate: This cohort would be administered etomidate with meperidine. The initial dose of etomidate is 0.1mg/kg IV and meperidine, 25mg. Additional dose of etomidate is 2mg(1cc). In old age cased, more than 65 years old, 30% of initial dose discounted. Meperidine: Both groups were administered same dose of meperidinie 50mg. Then elders \> 80 years old were administered 25mg iv bolus.
30
Midazolam
This cohort would be administered midazolam with meperidine. The initial dose of midazolam is 0.06mg/kg IV and meperidine 50mg IV. Additional dose is 1mg of midazolam. In the elders, more than 65 years old, initial dose was declined to 70%. Midazolam: This cohort would be administered midazolam with meperidine. The initial dose of midazolam is 0.06mg/kg IV and meperidine 50mg IV. Additional dose is 1mg of midazolam. In the elders, more than 65 years old, initial dose was declined to 70%. Meperidine: Both groups were administered same dose of meperidinie 50mg. Then elders \> 80 years old were administered 25mg iv bolus.
33
Total63

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyProtocol Violation32

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMidazolamTotalEtomidate
Age, Continuous71.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5
70.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.8
70.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.7
Body Mass Index (kg/square of m.)22.6 kg/square of m.
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.31
23.1 kg/square of m.
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.9
23.7 kg/square of m.
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.5
Procedure Time (min)32.8 min
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4
30.4 min
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.2
27.6 min
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.9
Sex: Female, Male
Female
19 Participants35 Participants16 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants28 Participants14 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 300 / 33
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 300 / 33

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Intervention

The frequency of intervention which was defined as any restraint of the patient's head, arms, or legs if they became agitated, or if patient movement was not controlled with verbal instruction from the endoscopist during the whole intraoperative phases.

Time frame: Throughout the whole ERCP procedure

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtomidateNumber of Intervention1.9 Number of interventionStandard Deviation 3.1
MidazolamNumber of Intervention7.5 Number of interventionStandard Deviation 6.8
Comparison: If the true difference in the experimental and control means is 4, total 26 experimental subjects and 26 control subjects was required to reject the null hypothesis that the means of the primary outcome values of experimental and control groups are equal with probability (power) 0.8. The Type I error probability associated with this test of this null hypothesis is 0.05.p-value: 0.05Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Event of Hypoxia

Hypoxia defined as peripheral blood oxygen saturation measured by pulse oxymeter \< 90%

Time frame: Every 5min in Preoperative, intraoperative phase and 15 min in Recovery phase

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EtomidateEvent of Hypoxia19 Hypoxia events
MidazolamEvent of Hypoxia27 Hypoxia events
Comparison: All the continuous variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test and dichotomous categorical variables was used and the Pearson chi-square with Fisher exact test. We used the linear mixed model to compare the differences of paired data, such as mean values of RR, SpO2, MAP, HR, and RSS at different time points of the two different sedation groups. For two-sided tests, p \< 0.05 was considered statistically significant.p-value: 0.00295% CI: [2.41, 50.94]Regression, Logistic

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026