Skip to content

Prostatic Artery Embolization (PAE) for Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)

Prostatic Artery Embolization (PAE) for Treatment of Signs and Symptoms of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02026908
Enrollment
45
Registered
2014-01-03
Start date
2014-01-01
Completion date
2023-03-27
Last updated
2024-11-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)

Keywords

Prostate Artery Embolization, PAE, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, BPH, Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, LUTS

Brief summary

This is an open-labeled, non-randomized feasibility study to evaluate the safety of prostate artery embolization (PAE) for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms attributed to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

Detailed description

This pilot study will be a single center, open labeled, non-randomized feasibility study to evaluate the initial safety of PAE for the treatment of symptomatic bladder outlet obstruction. 50 adult male subjects will be enrolled in this study. If eligible patients will undergo the prostate artery embolization procedure in the Interventional Radiology department. An angiogram of the prostate arteries will be done. Small beads called Embospheres will be injected into the prostate artery to slow blood flow to the prostate in the hope of providing relief with minimal side effects and complications, for lower urinary tract symptoms caused by BPH. After the procedure the patient will be followed at 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, 12 months post procedure and then annually for up to 4 years.

Interventions

Procedure completed in Interventional Radiology includes a pelvic/prostate angiogram and embolization with Embosphere microspheres to slow/block blood flow to the prostate.

Sponsors

Northwestern University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
45 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of LUTS secondary to BPH refractory to/contraindicated for medical treatment. * Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent * Prostate volumes 40 - 200 gm. May include 30-39 gm if the subject has a long history of ineffective response to combination medical treatments (alpha-blocker and a 5-alpha reductase inhibitor) for at least 6 months * Men ≥ 45 years of age * IPSS symptom score \> 13 and IPSS bother score \> 2 * Peak flow rate Qmax≤ 12 with voided volume ≥125 cc

Exclusion criteria

* History of prostate or bladder cancer, pelvic radiation, untreated bladder stones, * On alpha-blockers within the past 2 weeks unless on a stable dose of medication, with a stable urination pattern for 2 weeks prior to enrollment, and the willingness to stay on the same dose for the duration of the study, or until stopping criteria is met at the 12 month f/u visit, and or/part of a trial without catheter (TWOC) and patient is currently in Acute Urinary Retention (AUR) * On 5-alpha reductase inhibitors within the past 6 months unless on a stable dose of medication with a stable urination pattern for 30 days prior to enrollment and the willingness to stay on the same dose for the duration of the study or until stopping criteria is met at the 12 month f/u visit . * On phenylephrine, pseudoephedrine, imipramine, an anticholinergic or cholinergic medication within the past 2 weeks unless on a stable dose of medication with a stable urination pattern for 2 weeks prior to enrollment and the willingness to stay on the same dose for the duration of the study or until stopping criteria is met at the 12 month f/u visit . * On estrogen, androgen, any drug producing androgen suppression, or anabolic steroids within the past 4 months unless on stable dose of medication for 30 days prior to enrollment and the willingness to stay on the same dose for the duration of the study. * Daily use of a pad or device for incontinence required. * Urethral strictures, renal insufficiency (i.e. creatinine \> 1.8) * Known primary neurologic conditions such as multiple sclerosis or Parkinson's disease or other neurological diseases known to affect bladder function. * Neurogenic bladder, Hypotonic Bladder * Prior treatment for urinary incontinence * Penile prosthesis. * Artificial urinary sphincter. * Documented bacterial prostatitis within the past year. * Active urinary tract infection (UTI) unless in case of regular catheter dependence and thought to represent colonization. * History of chronic prostatitis within the last 1 year * Known bleeding disorders (e.g. von willebrand disease (VWD)) * History of urethral strictures/bladder neck closure (BNC) * Prior prostate procedures (e.g. Transurethral microwave therapy (TUMT), transurethral needle ablation of the prostate (TUNA), water-induced thermotherapy (WIT), transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), photo-vaporization of the prostate (PVP)) * Prior treatment for overactive bladder (e.g. intravesical botox) * Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) \> 4.0, \< 10.0 unless documented negative prostate biopsy within past 2 years and is not thought to harbor prostatic malignancy in the clinical opinion of the primary or co-investigator. * Enrolled in another treatment trial for any disease within the past 30 days * Declines or unable to provide informed consent * Condition precluding catheter-based intervention (ie occluded vessel, severe atheromatous disease) * Any serious medical condition likely to impede successful completion of the study, such as certain mental disorders, uncontrolled diabetes, cardiac arrhythmias, cardiac disease including congestive heart failure, significant respiratory disease, or known immunosuppression. * A history of rectal malignancy * Prior surgical prostate intervention * Interest in future fertility * Allergy to Iodinated contrast agents not responsive to steroid premedication regimen * Contraindication to Conscious sedation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Primary Objective is to Evaluate the Safety of Prostate Artery Embolization (PAE) for the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) Attributed to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH).5 yearsThe number and the severity of adverse events will be recorded to evaluate safety. Events will be reported by subjects and the severity of events will be graded using the following scale: Mild (grade 1): the event causes discomfort without disruption of normal daily activities Moderate (grade 2): the event causes discomfort that affects normal daily activities Severe (grade 3): the event makes the patient unable to perform normal daily activities or significantly affects his/her clinical status Life-threatening (grade 4): the patient was at risk of death at the time of the event Fatal (grade 5): the event caused death

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 yearsQuestionnaire-IPSS has 7 questions. Answer choices are as follows. The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) can be utilized to measure the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms. It is a validated, reproducible scoring system to assess disease severity and response to therapy. The IPSS is made up of 7 questions related to voiding symptoms. Scores can range from 0-35 with 0 being the better outcome and 35 the worst outcome. Question 1-6 0-Not at all 1. Less than 1 time in 5 2. Less than half the time 3. About half the time 4. More than half the time 5. Almost always Question 7 0-None 1-1 time 2-2 times 3-3 times 4-4 times 5-5 or more times
Change in Quality of Life (QOL) Bother Questionbaseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 yearsQuestionnaire The total score ranges from 0-6 with 0 being the best outcome and 6 being the worst outcome. Questionnaire- answers choices are as follows: 0- Delighted 1. Pleased 2. Mostly Satisfied 3. Mixed about equality satisfied and dissatisfied 4. Mostly Dissatisfied 5. Unhappy 6. Terrible
Change in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) Impact Indexbaseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 yearsQuestionnaire The BPH Impact Index is to assess the impact of BPH symptoms on patient health and functioning. It is a self-administered questionnaire with 4 questions about urinary problems during the past month regarding physical discomfort, worry about health, how bothersome symptoms are, and whether the symptoms are interfering with doing usual activities.The BII is an evaluative index useful in measuring the magnitude of change in the impact of BPH-LUTS within a person over time. Scores range from 0-13 with 0 being the best outcome and 13 being the worst. Questionnaire- consists of 4 questions; answer choices are as follows Question 1: 0-none, 1-only a little, 2-some, 3-a lot Question 2: 0-none, 1-only a little, 2-some, 3-a lot Question 3: 0-not at all bothersome, 1- bothers me a little, 2-bothers me some, 3-bothers me a lot Question 4: 0-none of the time, 1- a little of the time, 2- some of the time, 3-most of the time, 4-all of the time
Change in Qmax (Peak and Total Void Volume at Each Follow-up Visit)baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 yearsMeasure of urine flow rate. Q max = max flow rate. Peak Urine Flow (Qmax) from urodynamic assessments will be summarized comparing baseline to follow up measurements

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

All patients were evaluated and followed by a multidisciplinary team including urology and interventional radiology.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Prostate Artery Embolization
There is only one arm of this study where patients receive Prostate Artery Embolization Prostate Artery Embolization: Procedure completed in Interventional Radiology includes a pelvic/prostate angiogram and embolization with Embosphere microspheres to slow/block blood flow to the prostate.
45
Total45

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicProstate Artery Embolization
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
26 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
19 Participants
Age, Continuous67 years
BUN (mg/dl)19 mg/dl
Creatinine (mg/dl)1.0 mg/dl
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
42 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
International Normalized Ratio (INR)1.0 ratio
Length of BPH symptoms (years)6.4 years
Mean Total Prostate Volume99 cc
percentage of Free PSA24.1 percentage
PSA (ng/ml)3.4 ng/ml
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
42 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
45 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
45 Participants
Subjects with Abnormal Screening Urinalysis (RBCs) >4 per high Power field11 participants
Subjects with Abnormal Screening Urinalysis (WBCs) >5 per high Power Field22 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 45
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 45
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 45

Outcome results

Primary

The Primary Objective is to Evaluate the Safety of Prostate Artery Embolization (PAE) for the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) Attributed to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH).

The number and the severity of adverse events will be recorded to evaluate safety. Events will be reported by subjects and the severity of events will be graded using the following scale: Mild (grade 1): the event causes discomfort without disruption of normal daily activities Moderate (grade 2): the event causes discomfort that affects normal daily activities Severe (grade 3): the event makes the patient unable to perform normal daily activities or significantly affects his/her clinical status Life-threatening (grade 4): the patient was at risk of death at the time of the event Fatal (grade 5): the event caused death

Time frame: 5 years

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Prostate Artery EmbolizationThe Primary Objective is to Evaluate the Safety of Prostate Artery Embolization (PAE) for the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) Attributed to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH).Grade 1 AE Mild6 events
Prostate Artery EmbolizationThe Primary Objective is to Evaluate the Safety of Prostate Artery Embolization (PAE) for the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) Attributed to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH).Grade 2 AE Moderate10 events
Prostate Artery EmbolizationThe Primary Objective is to Evaluate the Safety of Prostate Artery Embolization (PAE) for the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) Attributed to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH).Grade 3 AE Severe1 events
Prostate Artery EmbolizationThe Primary Objective is to Evaluate the Safety of Prostate Artery Embolization (PAE) for the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) Attributed to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH).Grade 4 AE Life Threatening0 events
Prostate Artery EmbolizationThe Primary Objective is to Evaluate the Safety of Prostate Artery Embolization (PAE) for the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) Attributed to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH).Grade 5 AE Fatal0 events
p-value: 0.0001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) Impact Index

Questionnaire The BPH Impact Index is to assess the impact of BPH symptoms on patient health and functioning. It is a self-administered questionnaire with 4 questions about urinary problems during the past month regarding physical discomfort, worry about health, how bothersome symptoms are, and whether the symptoms are interfering with doing usual activities.The BII is an evaluative index useful in measuring the magnitude of change in the impact of BPH-LUTS within a person over time. Scores range from 0-13 with 0 being the best outcome and 13 being the worst. Questionnaire- consists of 4 questions; answer choices are as follows Question 1: 0-none, 1-only a little, 2-some, 3-a lot Question 2: 0-none, 1-only a little, 2-some, 3-a lot Question 3: 0-not at all bothersome, 1- bothers me a little, 2-bothers me some, 3-bothers me a lot Question 4: 0-none of the time, 1- a little of the time, 2- some of the time, 3-most of the time, 4-all of the time

Time frame: baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years

Population: Not all participants answered this questionnaire at all data points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Prostate Artery EmbolizationChange in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) Impact IndexBaseline7.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
Prostate Artery EmbolizationChange in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) Impact Index1 month follow up3.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
Prostate Artery EmbolizationChange in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) Impact Index3 month follow up2.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Prostate Artery EmbolizationChange in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) Impact Index6 month follow up2.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
Prostate Artery EmbolizationChange in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) Impact Index12 month follow up3.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Prostate Artery EmbolizationChange in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) Impact Index2 year follow up2.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Prostate Artery EmbolizationChange in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) Impact Index3 year follow up2.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Prostate Artery EmbolizationChange in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) Impact Index4 year follow up2.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Prostate Artery EmbolizationChange in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) Impact Index5 year follow up2.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
p-value: 0.0001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)

Questionnaire-IPSS has 7 questions. Answer choices are as follows. The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) can be utilized to measure the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms. It is a validated, reproducible scoring system to assess disease severity and response to therapy. The IPSS is made up of 7 questions related to voiding symptoms. Scores can range from 0-35 with 0 being the better outcome and 35 the worst outcome. Question 1-6 0-Not at all 1. Less than 1 time in 5 2. Less than half the time 3. About half the time 4. More than half the time 5. Almost always Question 7 0-None 1-1 time 2-2 times 3-3 times 4-4 times 5-5 or more times

Time frame: baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years

Population: Not all participants completed the questionnaire at all time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Prostate Artery EmbolizationChange in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)Baseline23.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.1
Prostate Artery EmbolizationChange in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)1 month follow up12 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.9
Prostate Artery EmbolizationChange in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)3 month Follow up10.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6
Prostate Artery EmbolizationChange in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)6 month follow up11.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.6
Prostate Artery EmbolizationChange in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)12 month follow up12.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.4
Prostate Artery EmbolizationChange in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)2 year follow up10.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.78
Prostate Artery EmbolizationChange in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)3 year follow up8.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.9
Prostate Artery EmbolizationChange in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)4 year follow up10.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.5
Prostate Artery EmbolizationChange in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)5 year follow up11.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.65
p-value: 0.0001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change in Qmax (Peak and Total Void Volume at Each Follow-up Visit)

Measure of urine flow rate. Q max = max flow rate. Peak Urine Flow (Qmax) from urodynamic assessments will be summarized comparing baseline to follow up measurements

Time frame: baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years

Population: Low numbers of participants for the 12 month follow and later follow up visits are attributed to COVID when no visits were being made in person. Q max was not requied at the 6 month visit which is why no participates have data for this time point. no participants returned for the 5 year follow up for an in person visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Prostate Artery EmbolizationChange in Qmax (Peak and Total Void Volume at Each Follow-up Visit)Baseline5.8 ml/secondStandard Deviation 1
Prostate Artery EmbolizationChange in Qmax (Peak and Total Void Volume at Each Follow-up Visit)1 month follow up12.4 ml/secondStandard Deviation 6.8
Prostate Artery EmbolizationChange in Qmax (Peak and Total Void Volume at Each Follow-up Visit)3 month follow up15.3 ml/secondStandard Deviation 12.3
Prostate Artery EmbolizationChange in Qmax (Peak and Total Void Volume at Each Follow-up Visit)1 year follow up12.6 ml/secondStandard Deviation 12.1
Prostate Artery EmbolizationChange in Qmax (Peak and Total Void Volume at Each Follow-up Visit)2 year follow up12.4 ml/secondStandard Deviation 6.7
Prostate Artery EmbolizationChange in Qmax (Peak and Total Void Volume at Each Follow-up Visit)3 year follow up9.0 ml/secondStandard Deviation 6.7
Prostate Artery EmbolizationChange in Qmax (Peak and Total Void Volume at Each Follow-up Visit)4 year follow up3.1 ml/secondStandard Deviation 0
p-value: 0.008t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change in Quality of Life (QOL) Bother Question

Questionnaire The total score ranges from 0-6 with 0 being the best outcome and 6 being the worst outcome. Questionnaire- answers choices are as follows: 0- Delighted 1. Pleased 2. Mostly Satisfied 3. Mixed about equality satisfied and dissatisfied 4. Mostly Dissatisfied 5. Unhappy 6. Terrible

Time frame: baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years

Population: Not all participants completed this score at all data points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Prostate Artery EmbolizationChange in Quality of Life (QOL) Bother QuestionBaseline4.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Prostate Artery EmbolizationChange in Quality of Life (QOL) Bother Question1 month follow up2.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Prostate Artery EmbolizationChange in Quality of Life (QOL) Bother Question3 month follow up2.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Prostate Artery EmbolizationChange in Quality of Life (QOL) Bother Question6 month follow up2.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Prostate Artery EmbolizationChange in Quality of Life (QOL) Bother Question12 month follow up2.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Prostate Artery EmbolizationChange in Quality of Life (QOL) Bother Question2 year follow up1.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Prostate Artery EmbolizationChange in Quality of Life (QOL) Bother Question3 year follow up1.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Prostate Artery EmbolizationChange in Quality of Life (QOL) Bother Question4 year follow up2.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Prostate Artery EmbolizationChange in Quality of Life (QOL) Bother Question5 year follow up2.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
p-value: 0.0001t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026