Skip to content

POEM Versus Pneumatic Dilatation in Achalasia Cardia

A Prospective Trial Comparing POEM to Pneumatic Dilatation for Treatment of Achalasia Cardia

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02025790
Enrollment
140
Registered
2014-01-01
Start date
2013-12-31
Completion date
2015-12-31
Last updated
2014-01-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Achalasia Cardia

Keywords

Achalasia, POEM, Pneumatic dilatation, Eckardt score

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to compare efficacy of POEM and pneumatic dilatation in treatment of achalasia cardia.

Detailed description

Achalasia is an esophageal motility disorder which involves smooth muscle of the esophagus and the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). Achalasia causes difficulty swallowing, regurgitation, and sometimes chest pain and weight loss. Endoscopic treatments of achalasia can be provided in the form of dilatation of the LES or cutting of muscle fibers (myotomy) of the esophagus and of the LES under endoscopic viewing. Dilatation in this trial is accomplished with rigiflex balloons and myotomy via Per Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM). The effectiveness of treatment of achalasia using each method will be compared in this trial.

Interventions

* Mucosal incision - After submucosal injection, a 2-cm longitudinal mucosal incision is made at approximately 12 cm proximal to the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). * Submucosal tunneling. A long submucosal tunnel is created to 3 cm distal to the GEJ. * Endoscopic myotomy is begun at 3 cm distal to the mucosal entry point, and is carried out in a proximal to distal direction to a total length of 10 cm. * Long endoscopic myotomy is performed 10 cm proximal to GEJ extending * Closure of mucosal entry: the mucosal incision is closed using hemostatic clips

Pneumatic dilatation using a Rigiflex balloon up to 35 mm at 8 psi for 1 minute.

Sponsors

Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Achalasia with Eckardt score at least 3 (0-12 scale achalasia least-most severe) 2. Age 18-75 years 3. Willing and able to comply with the study procedures and provide written informed consent form to participate in the study written informed consent form to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

1. Severe comorbid illness 2. Previous esophageal or gastric surgery 3. Pseudo achalasia 4. Achalasia with esophageal diverticula 5. Pregnancy or lactation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical success3 months post procedureClinical success defined as reduction of Eckardt score (0-12 scale achalasia least-most severe) of achalasia to an Eckardt score of 3 or less post procedure

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adverse events1 week post procedureAll dilatation or POEM related adverse events, including type, required intervention, severity, time to resolution

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of life3, 6 and 12 months post procedureQuality of Life (QOL) improvement at 3, 6 and 12 months post procedure compared to baseline using SF36 questionnaire
Cytokine levelsPre procedure and immediately and 6 hours post procedurePost procedural inflammation compared to baseline as measured by blood cytokine levels
Long term clinical success6 and 12 months post procedureLong term clinical success at 6 and 12 months post procedure compared to baseline.
LES pressure3, 6 and12 months post procedurePost procedure reduction in LES pressure at 3, 6 and 12 months compared to baseline.

Countries

India

Contacts

Primary ContactD Nageshwar Reddy, MD
aigindia@yahoo.co.in+914023378888

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026