Skip to content

Carolina-ColoWrap® in Colonoscopy Performance and Outcomes Study

Efficacy of ColoWrap® Abdominal Binder in Improving Performance and Tolerance of Colonoscopy: a Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Blinded Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02025504
Acronym
C3PO
Enrollment
350
Registered
2014-01-01
Start date
2014-04-30
Completion date
2015-03-31
Last updated
2015-04-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Performance and Tolerance of Colonoscopy

Keywords

Colonoscopy, Looping, Sigmoid Looping, ColoWrap, Binder, Patient Satisfaction

Brief summary

Colonoscopy is the gold-standard for colorectal cancer screening in the US. However, complete colonoscopy can be a challenging technical procedure, even for expert gastroenterologists due to variations in patient anatomy, tortuous colons, and looping of the endoscope. Such obstacles can prolong colonoscopy, lead to complications, decrease polyp detection, and impact patient experience and tolerance. The investigators propose to evaluate the efficacy of a new non-invasive abdominal binder (ColoWrap®) in improving the performance and tolerance of colonoscopy by way of a randomized, blinded clinical trial. Eligible participants undergoing colonoscopy at University of North Carolina Hospitals (UNCH) will be recruited for the study and randomized to either the ColoWrap intervention or sham arm. Colonoscopy will be performed per usual operating procedures. The primary outcome will be time to distal extent (cecal intubation time). Secondary outcomes include colonoscopy completion rate, use of ancillary maneuvers, medication usage, procedural difficulty, patient comfort, and operator and assistant fatigue and pain. Efficacy will be assessed on the basis of pairwise comparisons between groups with respect to primary and secondary outcomes.

Interventions

DEVICEColoWrap

ColoWrap is an abdominal binder intended as an accessory to facilitate colonoscopy.

Sponsors

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
CollaboratorOTHER
ColoWrap, LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male and female adults between the ages of 40 - 80 * Undergoing a colonoscopy at any of the study locations for: i. CRC screening (first colonoscopy or 10 year follow up of negative exam). ii. Surveillance (prior colonoscopy with polyps). iii. Diagnostic colonoscopy performed to evaluate symptoms such as abdominal pain or rectal bleeding. * Participants must have completed the full prescribed colonoscopy purgative preparation prior to their procedure, and describe adequate cleansing. * For the purposes of informed consent, participants must be able to understand and read English.

Exclusion criteria

* Inability to provide informed consent * Active or suspected pregnancy * Patients referred due to incomplete colonoscopy or for removal of difficult polyps * History of problems with sedation or anesthesia -. Participants electing to be unsedated for colonoscopy * Patients undergoing multiple procedures (e.g. upper and lower endoscopy) * Previous colon resection surgery * Patients with known or suspected diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease) * Patients with a history of colorectal cancer or other intra-abdominal malignancy. * Patients with open or recent wounds or skin rash on the anterior abdominal wall. * History of cirrhosis or ascites * Known ventral or umbilical hernia * Patients who are medically unstable(American Society of Anesthesiology Class III or above).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean colonoscopic insertion timeDuring colonoscopy, from insertion of scope into rectum to point in time when base of cecum is identifiedColonoscopic insertion time will be defined as the time from insertion of the colonoscope into the rectum to identification of the base of the cecum

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Frequency of use of ancillary maneuversDuring colonoscopy, from insertion of scope into rectum to point in time when base of cecum is identifiedBinary data indicating individually whether abdominal pressure or patient position change was used during the insertion phase of the procedure will be recorded.
Frequency of prolonged, difficult casesDuring colonoscopy, from time point of insertion of scope into rectum to point in time when scope is removed from rectumThe frequency of prolonged, difficult cases. Procedures in which the insertion phase is greater than 20 min will be recorded and indicated as such.
Drug and Dosage Required to Complete ProcedureDuring colonoscopy, from time point of insertion of scope into rectum to point in time when scope is removed from rectumDrug and dosage amount required by patient to complete colonoscopy.
Colonoscopy Completion RateDuring colonoscopy, from time point of insertion of scope into rectum to point in time when scope is removed from rectumColonoscopy completion rate. Dichotomous outcome indicating if the procedure was incomplete or complete.
Operator perception of patient discomfortDuring colonoscopy, from insertion of scope into rectum to point in time when base of cecum is identifiedImmediately following completion of procedure, ColoWrap study assistant will obtain operator perception of patient discomfort during procedure according to the Gloucester score
Patient Pain, Bloating, and Satisfaction at DischargeAt single time point occurring after the colonoscopy, just prior to the patient being discharged from facilityThe ColoWrap study assistant will interview patient just prior to discharge and obtain responses for pain and bloating according to 10-point visual analog scales, and global satisfaction according to a 5-point scale.
Operator's Assessment of Procedural DifficultlyDuring colonoscopy, from insertion of scope into rectum to point in time when base of cecum is identifiedImmediately following completion of procedure, the study assistant will obtain the operator's assessment of procedural difficulty and level of physical fatigue according to 5-point scales.
Assistant/Technician's Assessment of Musculoskeletal Pain Following ProcedureDuring colonoscopy, from insertion of scope into rectum to point in time when base of cecum is identifiedThe study assistant will ask the endoscopy technician if they experienced pain during the procedure in any of the following four anatomical sites: lower back, upper back, neck, or upper extremities (right and left shoulder, arm, wrist, hand, fingers). This frequency data will be dichotomous.
Time to patient dischargeFrom time point in which scope is removed from patient's rectum following a colonoscopy until the time the patient is discharged from the facilityTime to discharge, defined as the time from withdrawal of the colonoscope to patient discharge from the endoscopy unit.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Assessment of Intra-Procedural PainDuring colonoscopy, from insertion of scope into rectum to point in time when base of cecum is identifiedFor patients undergoing colonoscopy with conscious sedation, the study assistant will also obtain a response for intra-procedural pain, using a validated measure of procedural comfort.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 14, 2026