Skip to content

Comparison of Lormetazepam and Midazolam Used as Sedatives for Patients That Require Intensive Care

Comparison of Lormetazepam and Midazolam Used as Sedatives for Patients That Require Intensive Care

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02022592
Enrollment
84
Registered
2013-12-30
Start date
2014-07-17
Completion date
2020-03-12
Last updated
2022-04-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sedation in Intensive Care Unit Patients

Keywords

Sedation management, Midazolam, Lormetazepam, Intensive care unit

Brief summary

A goal directed , demand-driven administration of sedative drugs is an integral part of every intensive care treatment. During long-term application of sedatives, Midazolam is the most commonly used sedative in Europe. One major objective is the problem of oversedation and agitation during an intensive care treatment due to the lack of controllability of available substances. The Love-Mi RCT investigates the clinical controllability of Midazolam versus the newly available intravenous drug Lormetazepam.

Detailed description

Midazolam is almost exclusively metabolized intrahepatically. The methyl-group at position 1 of the imidazole ring is oxidized by liver enzymes. The product is a-OH-midazolam. This reaction is catalyzed by a p450-dependent oxidase in the liver. Active a-OH-midazolam is inactivated by a biotransformation type II reaction after conjugation. The water soluble, conjugated midazolam can be excreted by the kidney. During an intensive care treatment, the p450 dependent metabolization is known to be a bottleneck of elimination as many drugs are inactivated by this pathway. As the phase II (glucuronidation) is non-saturable in practice - the phase I reaction limits the metabolic capacity. This leads to unpredictable prolongation of midazolam effects. In contrast, Lormetazepam is glucuronized directly at its OH-group during a phase II reaction. Since the glucuronidation is non-saturable, Lormetazepam is metabolized with nearly constant kinetics even if repeatedly administered. Due to the pharmacokinetics we hypothesize that Lormetazepam has an improved controllability compared to midazolam. As this leads to less frequent agitation and over-sedation, we hypothesize that there are multiple beneficial clinical outcomes for patients treated with lormetazepam instead of midazolam.

Interventions

DRUGMidazolam

Sponsors

Claudia Spies
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Mechanically ventilated ICU patients with the need for sedatives to achieve or maintain the intended target-RASS (surgical/ nonsurgical). * Age ≥ 18 years * Patients who are incapable of giving consent at study inclusion: Written informed consent by patient's legal representative or an independent medical consultant, patients give informed consent subsequent if they are capable. * Patients who are able to give informed consent at study inclusion: Written informed consent by patients for planned postoperative prolonged ventilatory support who undergo heart surgery * Consensable patients for inclusion: with necessary intubation with analgosedation

Exclusion criteria

* Any bolus administration of benzodiazepines until 72hrs before inclusion (except from premedication due to anaesthesia). * Continuous administration of benzodiazepines within the last 7 days before start of study drug application * Titration phase: No way that a target RASS between -3 and 0 can be determined by the attending physician * Known drug intolerance or allergy against lormetazepam, midazolam or one of the additional components. * Addictive disorder * Increased intracranial pressure * Acute intoxication with alcohol, analgesics, sedatives, antipsychotics (neuroleptics, anti-depressives, lithium). * Patients with cerebrale Pathology, which changes the controllability of sedation or die consciousness (e.g. patients known mental retardation due to syndromatic disorders or an infantile brain damage) * Patients with a suspected or secured hypoxic brain damage * Patients with intracranial surgery during actual hospital care * Tetraplegic patients * Myasthenia Gravis * Cerebellar or spinal Ataxia * Moribund patients with an expected lifespan of less than 24 hours. * Sickle cell anaemia * Thallassemia * Enzyme related disorders that are associated with a severe decreased activity of UDP-glucoronyltransferase (e.g. M. Crigler- Najjar) * Chronic liver insufficiency CHILD C with MELD Score \> 17 before access to intensive care unit * Diagnosed propofol intolerance/anamnestic propofol infusion Syndrome * Known depression/suicidality * Pregnancy (positive beta-HCG test from urine or positive beta-HCG laboratory test from serum (in anuric patients the serum beta-HCG test is obliged) or lactation * Woman of child-bearing potential who are not using a highly effective contraception (Pearl - Index \<1) until 3 months after study inclusion and during this trial * Referral following an order of official authorities (court order or administrative decision) according to German Drug Law (AMG) §40 (1) 4 * Participation in clinical trials according to the German Drug Law (AMG) 30 days to and during the study * Local staff

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Controllability of sedationUp to 50 hoursControllability of sedation is defined as the percentage share of measures where the actual depth of sedation (measured with the Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale) (RASS)) matches the target depths of sedation. The individual sedation target is defined by the attending physician. . It will be measured until 5 days after terminationduring administration of study drug until 2 hours after its termination.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment)Up to 8 days
Pain-ScoresUp to 28 daysNRS-V (Numeric Rating Scale -V) and FPS-R (Faces Pain Scale-Revised) and BPS (Behavioral Pain Scale) and BPS-NI (Non-Intubated BPS) according to German consensus guidelines
Anxiety-ScoreUp to 28 daysFaces Anxiety Scale score
Concurrent medication for Analgesia and SedationUp to 8 daysdose/time.
Delirium-screening-InstrumentsUp to 28 daysCAM-ICU (Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Unit) ICDSC ( Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist) Nu-DESC (Nursing Delirium Screening Scale)
MortalityUp to 90 days
Duration of mechanical ventilation and weaning from mechanical ventilationUp to 8 days
Length of intensive care unit stayDuring intensive care unit stay, an average of 14 days
Length of hospital stayDuring hospital stay, an average of 28 days
Follow-up treatment regarding Patient- Documentation-Management-SystemDuring hospital stay, an average of 28 daysDischarge Mode
Length of sedationUp to 56 hoursDuring administration of study drug until 8 hours after its termination.
Number of changes in target Richmond agitation sedation scale (RASS)Up to 56 hoursDuring administration of study drug
Depth of sedation 1During the operationDepth of sedation is measured by Electroencephalography and Electromyography (only surgical patients in the Centers Charité and Gießen)
Deviation from target Richmond agitation sedation scale (RASS)Up to 8 daysDuring administration of study drug
Quality of LifeUp to 90 daysQuestionnaire designed to measure quality of life (EQ-5D-3L)
Cognition 1Up to 28 daysMinimental State Examination (MMSE)
Cognition 2Up to 90 daysMehrfach-Wortschatz-Intelligenztest (MWT)
Posttraumatic stress disorderUp to 90 daysThe Post-Traumatic Stress Syndrome 14-Questions Inventory
Bedside measurement of Acetylcholinesterase activity (U/gHb)Up to 8 daysThe Acetylcholinesterase activity will be measured on every study day out of a blood sample (10µl); It will be measured until 5 days after termination of study drug.
Organ dysfunctionsUp to 8 daysIt will be measured until 5 days after termination of study drug.
Depth of sedation 2Up to 3 daysDepth of sedation 2 is measured by Electroencephalography and Electromyography (intensive care unit patients only Center Charité)
Photomotor reflexUp to 8 daysPhoto motor reflex variations are measured by video pupillometry (only Center Charité)
Pain threshold measurementUp to 3 daysAutomatic measurement of specific pain reflexes
micro ribonucleic acid (rna)Up to 24 hoursmicro rna panel is analysed (only Center Charité)
Wake-up-timeUp to 8 daysDuring administration of study drug until 5 days after its termination

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026