Skip to content

ACell MatriStem Pelvic Floor Matrix Versus Native Tissue Repair, Comparative Study

Evaluation of the Use of Transvaginal Resorbable Biologic Mesh as Compared to Traditional Non-Mesh Surgical Repair for Treating Pelvic Floor Disorders

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02021279
Enrollment
161
Registered
2013-12-27
Start date
2014-06-11
Completion date
2021-04-28
Last updated
2022-02-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Keywords

pelvic organ prolapse, MatriStem, pelvic floor matrix, ACell, native tissue repair

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of MatriStem Pelvic Floor Matrix as compared to native tissue repair for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Patients are evaluated throughout a 3 year follow-up period.

Interventions

DEVICEMatriStem Pelvic Floor Matrix
PROCEDUREnative tissue repair

Sponsors

Integra LifeSciences Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject's leading edge of POP is at or beyond the hymen. At or beyond the hymen is defined as POP-Q scores of Ba ≥ 0 or Bp ≥ 0 or C ≥ 0 (for prolapse of the apical compartment alone) or C ≥ -½ total vaginal length (for a multi-compartment prolapse that includes the apical compartment). * Subject is seeking surgical intervention for symptomatic POP, which is defined as experiencing symptoms of vaginal bulging or pelvic heaviness. Vaginal bulge or pelvic heaviness will be considered present if a subject responds yes (≥1) to PFDI-20, question 3. * Subject or subject's legally authorized representative is willing to provide written informed consent. * Subject is willing and able to comply with the follow-up regimen.

Exclusion criteria

* Subject has a known hypersensitivity to porcine-based materials (relevant to subjects in MatriStem Pelvic Floor Matrix Group only). * Subject is pregnant or plans to become pregnant during the study. * Subject has an active or chronic systemic infection including any gynecologic infection, urinary tract infection (UTI), or tissue necrosis. * Subject has a known neurologic or medical condition affecting bladder function (e.g. multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury, or stroke with residual neurologic deficit). * Subject has chronic systemic pain syndrome (e.g. fibromyalgia, painful bladder syndrome). * Subject has a systemic connective tissue disease (e.g., scleroderma, systemic lupus erythematous (SLE), Marfans syndrome, Ehlers Danhlos, collagenosis, polymyositis or polymyalgia rheumatica). * Subject has uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM). * Subject has a history of pelvic organ cancer (e.g. uterine, ovarian, bladder, or cervical). * Subject has had prior or is currently undergoing radiation, laser therapy, or chemotherapy in the pelvic area. * Subject has taken systemic steroids (within the last month), immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory treatment (within the last 3 months). * Subject is seeking obliterative vaginal surgery as treatment for POP (colpoclesis). * Subject is not able to conform to the modified dorsal lithotomy position. * Subject is currently participating in or plans to participate in another device or drug study during this study. * Subject is to planning to undergo concurrent surgical treatment of prolapse using mesh other than the MatriStem Pelvic Floor Matrix.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The safety and effectiveness of surgical success/failure.3 yearsThe composite outcome of surgical success evaluates anatomic outcome, patient reported outcome, and no retreatment pelvic organ prolapse.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The surgical success/failure based on an alternate definition of success.3 yearsA composite outcome of surgical success based on an alternate definition of anatomic success, patient reported outcome, and no retreatment for pelvic organ prolapse.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026