Skip to content

Effect of Curodont Repair or Placebo on the Remineralisation in Patients With Class 5 Carious Lesions

Effect of Curodont Repair or Placebo on the Remineralisation in Patients With Class 5 Carious Lesions: A Mono-centre, Split-mouth, Double-blinded, Placebo Controlled, Randomised, Post Marketing Clinical Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02020681
Enrollment
40
Registered
2013-12-25
Start date
2013-09-30
Completion date
2016-01-31
Last updated
2019-08-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Caries

Keywords

Dental caries, Curodont Repair, P11-4

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the therapeutic benefit of Curodont Repair for the treatment of early buccal carious lesions compared to placebo.

Detailed description

All study participants must have two early class V carious lesions in need of a treatment but not of an invasive treatment (split-mouth design). One lesion will be treated with Curodont Repair and one with placebo as control (single application). 3 months later fluoride (Duraphat) will be applied on both lesions. Study duration is 9 months. For assessment visual and tactile evaluation, pictures, ECM, Diagnodent Pen, Canary System, VAS is used.

Interventions

Self-assembling peptide, biomimetic re-mineralisation

OTHERPlacebo

Formulation of Curodont Repair without the peptide P11-4

DEVICEFluoride

Single application on day D90

Sponsors

Credentis AG
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
14 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Two class V carious lesions which do not require an invasive treatment * Size and form of the lesions: the lesions must both be fully visible and assessable and accessible * Patients must be able and willing to observe good oral hygiene throughout the study -≥ 20 teeth * Permanent dentition and ≤ 65 years * Willing and able to attend the on-study visits * Willing and able to understand all study-related procedures * Written informed consent before participation in the study * Negative pregnancy test for women of childbearing potential

Exclusion criteria

* The two study lesions must not be on adjacent teeth * No adjacent restoration on study tooth surface * Fluoride varnish application \< 6 months prior to study treatment * Patient suffers from diabetes * Evidence of tooth erosion (due to excessive acidic drink consumption or reflux) * History of head and neck illnesses (e.g. head/neck cancer) * Any pathology or concomitant medication affecting salivary flow or dry mouth * Any metabolic disorders affecting bone turnover * Concurrent participation in another clinical trial with an investigational drug or device or participation in another clinical trial with an investigational drug or device within 30 days prior to study entry * Pregnant and lactating woman

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The primary efficacy outcome is the difference of the change in the lesion size assessed by morphometry (standardised pictures) between investigational medical device and placebo group.D0, D30, D90, D270Change of lesion size relative to baseline between study groups and different time points

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in the change of Diagnodent Pen values between investigational medical device and placebo group.D0, D30, D90, D180, D270only descriptively analysed
Change in lesion's progression assessed by VAS between investigational medical device and placebo group.D0, D30, D90, D180, D270only descriptively analysed

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026