Skip to content

Electric Stimulation of the Eye to Improve Vision After Trauma

Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Safety of Transcorneal Electrical Stimulation to Improve Visual Function After Ocular Trauma

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02019927
Acronym
TES
Enrollment
97
Registered
2013-12-24
Start date
2013-07-31
Completion date
2017-09-30
Last updated
2020-01-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non-arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy (NAION), Trauma, Multiple Sclerosis (MS)

Keywords

NAION, Decreased vision, Eye trauma, TES, Electrical stimulation, Multiple Sclerosis, Optic Neuritis

Brief summary

Transcorneal Electrical Stimulation (TES) using the OkuStim® device delivers electrical impulses to damaged and/or diseased photoreceptor cells. This electric stimulation of the retina may help to preserve visual acuity and/or the visual field.

Detailed description

The finely detailed, precise anatomy of the retina and optic nerve capture light impulses from the environment through a biochemical process and then transmit these images to the brain via electrical impulses conducted from the inner retina to the optic nerve and ultimately to the occipital cortex. In the human eye, three types of specialized ganglion cells transmit electrical impulses to the brain. Among these three cell populations are rod and cone cells, which participate in the photo-transduction step of light perception, along with other light sensitive ganglion cells. It is a system whereby the photosensitive pigment rhodopsin (or one of its analogs) rearranges in response to light, and this change in chemical structure fires electrical impulses to the brain which in turn interprets the incoming impulses as a visual image. Transcorneal Electrical Stimulation (TES) using the OkuStim® device delivers electrical impulses to damaged and/or diseased photoreceptor cells. This electric stimulation of the retina may help to preserve VA and/or the visual field.

Interventions

The clinical trial will investigate whether Transcorneal Electrical Stimulation delivered by the Okuvision Stimulation Set manufactured by Okuvision GmbH, Reutlingen, Germany, is a potentially effective therapy for the restoration and rehabilitation of vision loss as measured by improvements in visual acuity in the following three patient populations: patients with ocular trauma, patients with optic neuritis associated with multiple sclerosis and patients with Non-arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy.

DEVICESham

Sham

Sponsors

United States Department of Defense
CollaboratorFED
Wills Eye
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* You are 18 years or older. * You have sustained trauma (more than 3 months before this study) OR been diagnosed with Non-Arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy (NAION) (more than 6 months before this study) OR been diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and suffered visual loss (more than 3 months before this study). * You are willing and able to give written informed consent. * You are able to commit to enrolling in the study during the full time period of up to 6 months.

Exclusion criteria

* You have any other significant ophthalmologic disease or condition (such as glaucoma, retinal degeneration, proliferative diabetic retinopathy, +/- six diopters of myopia, retinal detachment, exudative age-related macular degeneration). * You have amblyopia (lazy eye) in affected eye, previously diagnosed. * You are participating in any other interventional clinical trial. * If you are pregnant OR a woman with childbearing potential who is unwilling to use medically acceptable means of birth control for study duration OR woman unwilling to perform a pregnancy test at study entry/screening. * You are unable to give signed consent due to memory, medical, communication, language, or mental health problems. * You are less than 18 years old. * You are unable or unwilling to complete the evaluation or questionnaire. * Visual acuity better than 20/40 * Inability to detect phosphenes during threshold detection * You are on seizure medications, or have a history of epilepsy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Safety of Transcorneal Electrical Stimulation to Improve Visual AcuityChange from Baseline (week 1) to 1-week post initial treatment (week 8)The primary outcomes are change in high-contrast LogMar VA from baseline (week 1) to initial post treatment (week 8). Participants read letters from a chart and receive 1 point for each letter correctly identified. Scores are converted to logMAR scale and analyzed for changes in visual acuity. Improvement in visual acuity is defined as a decrease in logMAR of 0.2 or more.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Field Mean DeviationChange from Baseline (week 1) to 1 - week post initial treatment (week 8)The Humphrey 24-2 Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm Standard perimeter was used to test visual field. Reported values are a change from baseline to 1-week post initial treatment.
Ocular Coherent Tomography, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Superior QuadrantChange from Baseline (week 1) to 1 - week post initial treatment (week 8)Assessed the change in thickness of the retinal nerve fiber layer 1-week post treatment compared to baseline
Ocular Coherent Tomography, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Nasal QuadrantChange from Baseline (week 1) to 1 - week post initial treatment (week 8)Assessed the change in thickness of the retinal nerve fiber layer 1-week post treatment compared to baseline
Ocular Coherent Tomography, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Inferior QuadrantChange from Baseline (week 1) to 1 - week post initial treatment (week 8)Assessed the change in thickness of the retinal nerve fiber layer 1-week post treatment compared to baseline
Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP)Change from Baseline (week 1) to 1-week post initial treatment (week 8)Measured by Applanation (Galdmann) Tonometry method
Ocular Coherent Tomography, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Center QuadrantChange from Baseline (week 1) to 1 - week post initial treatment (week 8)Assessed the change in thickness of the retinal nerve fiber layer 1-week post treatment compared to baseline
National Eye Institute's Visual Functioning Questionnaire - 25Change from Baseline to 1 - week post initial treatmentTest to measure Unweighted of scores within test ranging from 0-100 with higher scores meaning better outcome
Symbol Digit Modality TestingChange from Baseline to 1 - week post initial treatmentScores range from 0-110 with higher scores meaning better visual information processing speed
Ocular Coherent Tomography, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Temporal QuadrantChange from Baseline (week 1) to 1 - week post initial treatment (week 8)Assessed the change in thickness of the retinal nerve fiber layer 1-week post treatment compared to baseline

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Non-arteritic Ischemic Optic Neuropathy
Treatment of decreased vision due to NAION with the transcorneal electrical stimulation device (6+ months post-event). Transcorneal Electrical Stimulation: The clinical trial will investigate whether Transcorneal Electrical Stimulation delivered by the Okuvision Stimulation Set manufactured by Okuvision GmbH, Reutlingen, Germany, is a potentially effective therapy for the restoration and rehabilitation of vision loss as measured by improvements in visual acuity in the following three patient populations: patients with ocular trauma, patients with optic neuritis associated with multiple sclerosis and patients with Non-arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy.
46
Non-arteritic Ischemic Optic Neuropathy Sham
Sham comparator for the Non-arteritic ischemic optic neuropathy group
23
Multiple Sclerosis
Treatment of decreased vision due to multiple sclerosis with the transcorneal electrical stimulation device (3+ months post visual changes). Transcorneal Electrical Stimulation: The clinical trial will investigate whether Transcorneal Electrical Stimulation delivered by the Okuvision Stimulation Set manufactured by Okuvision GmbH, Reutlingen, Germany, is a potentially effective therapy for the restoration and rehabilitation of vision loss as measured by improvements in visual acuity in the following three patient populations: patients with ocular trauma, patients with optic neuritis associated with multiple sclerosis and patients with Non-arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy.
9
Multiple Sclerosis Sham
Sham comparator for the multiple sclerosis group
5
Ocular Trauma
Treatment of decreased vision due to ocular trauma with the transcorneal electrical stimulation device (3+ months post-trauma). Transcorneal Electrical Stimulation: The clinical trial will investigate whether Transcorneal Electrical Stimulation delivered by the Okuvision Stimulation Set manufactured by Okuvision GmbH, Reutlingen, Germany, is a potentially effective therapy for the restoration and rehabilitation of vision loss as measured by improvements in visual acuity in the following three patient populations: patients with ocular trauma, patients with optic neuritis associated with multiple sclerosis and patients with Non-arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy.
10
Ocular Trauma Sham
Sham comparator for the ocular trauma group
4
Total97

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up241231

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNon-arteritic Ischemic Optic NeuropathyTotalOcular Trauma ShamOcular TraumaMultiple Sclerosis ShamMultiple SclerosisNon-arteritic Ischemic Optic Neuropathy Sham
Age, Continuous62.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8
50.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9
45.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2
49.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.2
41 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2
40.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7
66 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.4
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
44 Participants93 Participants4 Participants8 Participants5 Participants9 Participants23 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants3 Participants0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants6 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants3 Participants0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
43 Participants86 Participants4 Participants8 Participants3 Participants7 Participants21 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
46 participants97 participants4 participants10 participants5 participants9 participants23 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants37 Participants1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants7 Participants11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
33 Participants60 Participants3 Participants8 Participants2 Participants2 Participants12 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 450 / 230 / 90 / 50 / 90 / 4
other
Total, other adverse events
15 / 450 / 233 / 90 / 55 / 90 / 4
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 450 / 230 / 90 / 50 / 90 / 4

Outcome results

Primary

Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Safety of Transcorneal Electrical Stimulation to Improve Visual Acuity

The primary outcomes are change in high-contrast LogMar VA from baseline (week 1) to initial post treatment (week 8). Participants read letters from a chart and receive 1 point for each letter correctly identified. Scores are converted to logMAR scale and analyzed for changes in visual acuity. Improvement in visual acuity is defined as a decrease in logMAR of 0.2 or more.

Time frame: Change from Baseline (week 1) to 1-week post initial treatment (week 8)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Non-arteritic Ischemic Optic NeuropathyEvaluation of the Effectiveness and Safety of Transcorneal Electrical Stimulation to Improve Visual Acuity-0.23 logMAR
Sham - Non-arteritic Ischemic Optic NeuropathyEvaluation of the Effectiveness and Safety of Transcorneal Electrical Stimulation to Improve Visual Acuity-0.14 logMAR
Multiple SclerosisEvaluation of the Effectiveness and Safety of Transcorneal Electrical Stimulation to Improve Visual Acuity-0.08 logMAR
Sham - Multiple SclerosisEvaluation of the Effectiveness and Safety of Transcorneal Electrical Stimulation to Improve Visual Acuity-0.06 logMAR
Ocular TraumaEvaluation of the Effectiveness and Safety of Transcorneal Electrical Stimulation to Improve Visual Acuity-0.29 logMAR
Sham - Ocular TraumaEvaluation of the Effectiveness and Safety of Transcorneal Electrical Stimulation to Improve Visual Acuity-0.05 logMAR
Secondary

Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP)

Measured by Applanation (Galdmann) Tonometry method

Time frame: Change from Baseline (week 1) to 1-week post initial treatment (week 8)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Non-arteritic Ischemic Optic NeuropathyIntra-Ocular Pressure (IOP)-0.32 mmHg
Sham - Non-arteritic Ischemic Optic NeuropathyIntra-Ocular Pressure (IOP)-1.13 mmHg
Multiple SclerosisIntra-Ocular Pressure (IOP)-0.27 mmHg
Sham - Multiple SclerosisIntra-Ocular Pressure (IOP)0.52 mmHg
Ocular TraumaIntra-Ocular Pressure (IOP)0.52 mmHg
Sham - Ocular TraumaIntra-Ocular Pressure (IOP)-0.57 mmHg
Secondary

National Eye Institute's Visual Functioning Questionnaire - 25

Test to measure Unweighted of scores within test ranging from 0-100 with higher scores meaning better outcome

Time frame: Change from Baseline to 1 - week post initial treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Non-arteritic Ischemic Optic NeuropathyNational Eye Institute's Visual Functioning Questionnaire - 25-0.59 score on a scale - change from baseline
Sham - Non-arteritic Ischemic Optic NeuropathyNational Eye Institute's Visual Functioning Questionnaire - 250.16 score on a scale - change from baseline
Multiple SclerosisNational Eye Institute's Visual Functioning Questionnaire - 254.59 score on a scale - change from baseline
Sham - Multiple SclerosisNational Eye Institute's Visual Functioning Questionnaire - 254.57 score on a scale - change from baseline
Ocular TraumaNational Eye Institute's Visual Functioning Questionnaire - 253.64 score on a scale - change from baseline
Sham - Ocular TraumaNational Eye Institute's Visual Functioning Questionnaire - 255.27 score on a scale - change from baseline
Secondary

Ocular Coherent Tomography, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Center Quadrant

Assessed the change in thickness of the retinal nerve fiber layer 1-week post treatment compared to baseline

Time frame: Change from Baseline (week 1) to 1 - week post initial treatment (week 8)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Non-arteritic Ischemic Optic NeuropathyOcular Coherent Tomography, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Center Quadrant-0.07 um
Sham - Non-arteritic Ischemic Optic NeuropathyOcular Coherent Tomography, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Center Quadrant3.89 um
Multiple SclerosisOcular Coherent Tomography, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Center Quadrant-2.83 um
Sham - Multiple SclerosisOcular Coherent Tomography, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Center Quadrant-1.07 um
Ocular TraumaOcular Coherent Tomography, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Center Quadrant-0.62 um
Sham - Ocular TraumaOcular Coherent Tomography, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Center Quadrant-0.42 um
Secondary

Ocular Coherent Tomography, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Inferior Quadrant

Assessed the change in thickness of the retinal nerve fiber layer 1-week post treatment compared to baseline

Time frame: Change from Baseline (week 1) to 1 - week post initial treatment (week 8)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Non-arteritic Ischemic Optic NeuropathyOcular Coherent Tomography, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Inferior Quadrant-0.04 um
Sham - Non-arteritic Ischemic Optic NeuropathyOcular Coherent Tomography, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Inferior Quadrant-0.64 um
Multiple SclerosisOcular Coherent Tomography, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Inferior Quadrant-2.37 um
Sham - Multiple SclerosisOcular Coherent Tomography, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Inferior Quadrant1.07 um
Ocular TraumaOcular Coherent Tomography, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Inferior Quadrant0.57 um
Sham - Ocular TraumaOcular Coherent Tomography, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Inferior Quadrant-1.53 um
Secondary

Ocular Coherent Tomography, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Nasal Quadrant

Assessed the change in thickness of the retinal nerve fiber layer 1-week post treatment compared to baseline

Time frame: Change from Baseline (week 1) to 1 - week post initial treatment (week 8)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Non-arteritic Ischemic Optic NeuropathyOcular Coherent Tomography, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Nasal Quadrant-0.48 um
Sham - Non-arteritic Ischemic Optic NeuropathyOcular Coherent Tomography, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Nasal Quadrant-1.24 um
Multiple SclerosisOcular Coherent Tomography, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Nasal Quadrant-3.60 um
Sham - Multiple SclerosisOcular Coherent Tomography, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Nasal Quadrant0.28 um
Ocular TraumaOcular Coherent Tomography, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Nasal Quadrant0.49 um
Sham - Ocular TraumaOcular Coherent Tomography, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Nasal Quadrant-1.36 um
Secondary

Ocular Coherent Tomography, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Superior Quadrant

Assessed the change in thickness of the retinal nerve fiber layer 1-week post treatment compared to baseline

Time frame: Change from Baseline (week 1) to 1 - week post initial treatment (week 8)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Non-arteritic Ischemic Optic NeuropathyOcular Coherent Tomography, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Superior Quadrant-0.70 um
Sham - Non-arteritic Ischemic Optic NeuropathyOcular Coherent Tomography, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Superior Quadrant12.41 um
Multiple SclerosisOcular Coherent Tomography, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Superior Quadrant-3.80 um
Sham - Multiple SclerosisOcular Coherent Tomography, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Superior Quadrant-5.97 um
Ocular TraumaOcular Coherent Tomography, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Superior Quadrant0.37 um
Sham - Ocular TraumaOcular Coherent Tomography, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Superior Quadrant1.42 um
Secondary

Ocular Coherent Tomography, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Temporal Quadrant

Assessed the change in thickness of the retinal nerve fiber layer 1-week post treatment compared to baseline

Time frame: Change from Baseline (week 1) to 1 - week post initial treatment (week 8)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Non-arteritic Ischemic Optic NeuropathyOcular Coherent Tomography, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Temporal Quadrant2.15 um
Sham - Non-arteritic Ischemic Optic NeuropathyOcular Coherent Tomography, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Temporal Quadrant-0.64 um
Multiple SclerosisOcular Coherent Tomography, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Temporal Quadrant-0.49 um
Sham - Multiple SclerosisOcular Coherent Tomography, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Temporal Quadrant1.07 um
Ocular TraumaOcular Coherent Tomography, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Temporal Quadrant-0.35 um
Sham - Ocular TraumaOcular Coherent Tomography, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Temporal Quadrant-1.53 um
Secondary

Symbol Digit Modality Testing

Scores range from 0-110 with higher scores meaning better visual information processing speed

Time frame: Change from Baseline to 1 - week post initial treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Non-arteritic Ischemic Optic NeuropathySymbol Digit Modality Testing-0.03 score on a scale - change from baseline
Sham - Non-arteritic Ischemic Optic NeuropathySymbol Digit Modality Testing-0.01 score on a scale - change from baseline
Multiple SclerosisSymbol Digit Modality Testing2.98 score on a scale - change from baseline
Sham - Multiple SclerosisSymbol Digit Modality Testing-0.77 score on a scale - change from baseline
Ocular TraumaSymbol Digit Modality Testing4.08 score on a scale - change from baseline
Sham - Ocular TraumaSymbol Digit Modality Testing6.14 score on a scale - change from baseline
Secondary

Visual Field Mean Deviation

The Humphrey 24-2 Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm Standard perimeter was used to test visual field. Reported values are a change from baseline to 1-week post initial treatment.

Time frame: Change from Baseline (week 1) to 1 - week post initial treatment (week 8)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Non-arteritic Ischemic Optic NeuropathyVisual Field Mean Deviation1.49 Decibels (dB)
Sham - Non-arteritic Ischemic Optic NeuropathyVisual Field Mean Deviation2.09 Decibels (dB)
Multiple SclerosisVisual Field Mean Deviation1.31 Decibels (dB)
Sham - Multiple SclerosisVisual Field Mean Deviation0.96 Decibels (dB)
Ocular TraumaVisual Field Mean Deviation1.70 Decibels (dB)
Sham - Ocular TraumaVisual Field Mean Deviation0.25 Decibels (dB)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026