Skip to content

A Study of the Effectiveness and Safety of Nivolumab Compared to Bevacizumab and of Nivolumab With or Without Ipilimumab in Glioblastoma Patients

A Randomized Phase 3 Open Label Study of Nivolumab Versus Bevacizumab and Multiple Phase 1 Safety Cohorts of Nivolumab or Nivolumab in Combination With Ipilimumab Across Different Lines of Glioblastoma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02017717
Acronym
CheckMate 143
Enrollment
529
Registered
2013-12-23
Start date
2014-02-07
Completion date
2024-06-21
Last updated
2025-04-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Recurrent Glioblastoma

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of nivolumab administered alone versus bevacizumab in patients diagnosed with recurrent glioblastoma (a type of brain cancer, also known as GBM), and to evaluate the safety and tolerability of nivolumab administered alone or in combination with ipilimumab in patients with different lines of GBM therapy.

Detailed description

Allocation: Randomized (Cohorts 1, 2 and Part B of 1c/1d), Non-Randomized (Cohorts 1b, and Part A of 1c/1d)

Interventions

BIOLOGICALNivolumab

specified dose on specified days

BIOLOGICALBevacizumab

specified dose on specified days

BIOLOGICALIpilimumab

specified dose on specified days

Sponsors

Bristol-Myers Squibb
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants with histologically confirmed Grade IV malignant glioma * Previous treatment with radiotherapy and temozolomide (Cohorts 1, 1b and 2 only) * First recurrence of GBM (Cohorts 1, 1b and 2 only) * First diagnosis of GBM with resectable disease (Cohorts 1c Part A only) * First diagnosis of unmethylated MGMT GBM (Cohort 1d and Cohort 1c Part B only) * Karnofsky performance score of 70 or higher

Exclusion criteria

* More than 1 recurrence of GBM (Cohorts 1, 1b and 2 only) * Any recurrence of GBM (Cohorts 1c and 1d only) * Presence of extracranial metastatic or leptomeningeal disease * Active, known or suspected autoimmune disease * Clinically significant cardiovascular disease * Prior bevacizumab or other Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) or anti-angiogenic treatment (Cohort 2 only)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Survival (OS) for Cohort 2Time between the date of randomization and the date of death due to any cause (up to up to 17Jun2019, approximately 5 years)OS was measured in months from the time of randomization to the event date (death) due to any cause. A participant who has not died will be censored at the last known alive date. Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates. Hazard ratio from Cox proportional hazard model stratified by presence of measurable lesions at baseline per IVRS. P-value from log-rank test stratified by presence of measurable lesions at baseline per IVRS.
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dFrom first dose to 30 days post last dose (up to approximately 34 months).The percentage of participants who experienced an adverse event by worst grade in each treatment arm. Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. MedDRA Version: 24.1
Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dFrom first dose to 30 days post last dose (up to approximately 34 months).The percentage of participants who experienced a serious adverse event by worst grade in each treatment arm. Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. MedDRA Version: 24.1
Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dFrom first dose to 30 days post last dose (up to approximately 34 months).The percentage of participants who experienced a laboratory abnormality of the liver in each treatment arm. MedDRA Version: 24.1 Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) Upper Limit of Normal (ULN) Denominator corresponds to participants with at least on one treatment measurement of the corresponding laboratory parameter. Includes laboratory results reported after the first dose and within 30 days of last dose of study therapy.
Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dFrom first dose to 30 days post last dose (up to approximately 34 months).The percentage of participants who experienced a laboratory abnormality of the thyroid in each treatment arm. MedDRA Version: 24.1 Free T3 (FT3) Free T4 (FT4) Lower Limit of Normal (LLN) (A) Within a 2-week window after the abnormal TSH test date. (B) Includes participants with TSH abnormality and with no FT3/FT4 test values in the 2-week window or with non-abnormal value(s) from only one of the two tests and no value from the other test.
Percentage of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation by Worst CTC Grade for All Treated Participants in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d Who Permanently Discontinued Study Medication Prior to Completing Four DosesIncludes events reported between first dose and 30 days after last dose of study therapy (up to 3 doses, up to approximately 2 months)The percentage of participants who experienced a drug-related adverse event leading to drug discontinuation by worst grade (grade 5 being the worst) prior to complete four-dose treatment. Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. MedDRA Version: 24.1

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Survival (OS) for Cohorts 1c and 1dTime between the date of randomization and the date of death due to any cause (up to approximately 10 years and 5 months)OS was measured in months from the time of randomization (Part B) or time of treatment (Part A) to the event date (death) due to any cause. A participant who has not died will be censored at the last known alive date. Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates.
Progression Free Survival (PFS) for Cohort 2Time from randomization to the date of the first documented tumor progression or death due to any cause (up to approximately 10 years and 5 months)PFS was measured in months from the time of randomization to the date of the first documented tumor progression or death due to any cause. Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates. Hazard ratio from Cox proportional hazard model stratified by presence of measurable lesions at baseline per IVRS.
Objective Response Rate (ORR) for Cohort 2Time from randomization to the date of the first documented tumor progression or death due to any cause (up to approximately 10 years and 5 months)ORR was measured by the percentage of participants whose best overall response (BOR) is confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) divided by response evaluable participants. The best overall response (BOR) is determined once all the data for the participant is known. BOR is defined as the best response designation, as determined by investigators, recorded between the date of randomization and the date of objectively documented progression per RANO criteria, the date of subsequent therapy, or date of surgical resection, whichever occurs first. Confidence interval based on the Clopper and Pearson method. For the comparison of the odds ratio of Nivolumab over Bevacizumab, the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) method of weighting was utilized.
Overall Survival (OS) at 12 Months for Cohort 2From randomization to 12 months following randomizationOS(12) is measured as the percentage of participants alive at 12 months per Kaplan-Meier curve of OS. Z test with variance estimation based on Greenwood formula using log(-log) transformation.

Countries

Australia, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Spain, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

529 participants participated in the study. Of these 529 participants, 448 were randomized in the pre-treatment phase while 81 were directly treated in a non-randomized fashion. Of the 448 participants randomized, 423 moved to the treatment phase. The total number of treated participants was 504 (81 directly treated, 423 randomized and treated). GBM = Glioblastoma MGMT = O6-methylguanin-DNA-methyltransferase

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cohort 1: Arm N1+I3
Nivolumab 1 mg/kg administered as a 60-minute intravenous (IV) infusion followed by ipilimumab 3 mg/kg 90-minute IV infusion every 3 weeks for 4 cycles, then nivolumab 3 mg/kg 60-minute IV every 2 weeks thereafter
10
Cohort 1: Arm N3
Nivolumab 3 mg/kg dosed as 60-minute IV infusion every 2 weeks
10
Cohort 1b: Arm N3+I1
Nivolumab 3 mg/kg administered as a 60-minute IV infusion followed by ipilimumab 1 mg/kg 90-minute IV infusion every 3 weeks for 4 cycles, then nivolumab 3 mg/kg 60-minute IV every 2 weeks thereafter
20
Part A Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZ
Participants with newly diagnosed GBM: Nivolumab 3 mg/kg dosed as 60-minute IV infusion every 2 weeks with standard of care treatment including surgical resection and chemoradiation followed by 6 or more cycles of maintenance temozolomide
31
Part A Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RT
Participants with newly diagnosed unmethylated MGMT GBM: Nivolumab 3 mg/kg dosed as 60-minute IV infusion every 2 weeks with standard of care treatment including surgical resection and radiation therapy
30
Part B Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZ
Participants with newly diagnosed GBM: Nivolumab 3 mg/kg dosed as 60-minute IV infusion every 2 weeks with standard of care treatment including surgical resection and chemoradiation followed by 6 or more cycles of maintenance temozolomide
29
Part B Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RT
Participants with newly diagnosed unmethylated MGMT GBM: Nivolumab 3 mg/kg dosed as 60-minute IV infusion every 2 weeks with standard of care treatment including surgical resection and radiation therapy
30
Cohort 2: Arm N3
Nivolumab 3 mg/kg dosed as 60-minute IV infusion every 2 weeks
184
Cohort 2: Arm B
Bevacizumab 10 mg/kg dosed every 2 weeks as 90-minute IV infusion for the first dose and 60-minute IV infusions for subsequent doses if the first infusion is tolerated
185
Total529

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006FG007FG008
Before Treatment PeriodAdverse Event unrelated to study drug000000010
Before Treatment PeriodLost to Follow-up000000001
Before Treatment Periodother reason000000001
Before Treatment PeriodParticipant no longer met criteria000001012
Before Treatment PeriodParticipant request to stop therapy000000005
Before Treatment PeriodParticipant withdrew consent0000002011
Treatment PeriodAdverse event unrelated to study drug002000145
Treatment PeriodDeath001002000
Treatment PeriodDisease progression791220261622165135
Treatment PeriodMaximum clinical benefit000000001
Treatment PeriodNot reported010000000
Treatment PeriodOther reasons000101111
Treatment PeriodParticipant no longer met criteria000000001
Treatment PeriodParticipant request to stop therapy003602147
Treatment PeriodParticipant withdrew consent001002014
Treatment PeriodStudy drug toxicity3014453711

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCohort 1: Arm N3Cohort 1b: Arm N3+I1Part A Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPart A Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPart B Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZCohort 1: Arm N1+I3Part B Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTCohort 2: Arm N3Cohort 2: Arm BTotal
Age, Continuous58.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9
55.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9
56.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
58.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2
57.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7
54.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
58.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5
55.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
54.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7
55.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1
Age, Customized
< 65
6 Participants17 Participants23 Participants22 Participants22 Participants7 Participants19 Participants142 Participants156 Participants414 Participants
Age, Customized
>= 65
4 Participants3 Participants8 Participants8 Participants7 Participants3 Participants11 Participants42 Participants29 Participants115 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants4 Participants1 Participants10 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
10 Participants20 Participants29 Participants27 Participants28 Participants10 Participants29 Participants86 Participants88 Participants327 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants94 Participants96 Participants192 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants7 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants8 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants4 Participants1 Participants10 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
8 Participants18 Participants26 Participants28 Participants27 Participants10 Participants28 Participants176 Participants181 Participants502 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants6 Participants11 Participants8 Participants10 Participants4 Participants9 Participants68 Participants66 Participants187 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants14 Participants20 Participants22 Participants19 Participants6 Participants21 Participants116 Participants119 Participants342 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
EG008
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
10 / 109 / 1020 / 2029 / 3130 / 3028 / 2928 / 30180 / 184166 / 185
other
Total, other adverse events
10 / 1010 / 1020 / 2031 / 3129 / 3027 / 2827 / 28168 / 182148 / 165
serious
Total, serious adverse events
8 / 107 / 1015 / 2024 / 3119 / 3016 / 2819 / 28117 / 18294 / 165

Outcome results

Primary

Overall Survival (OS) for Cohort 2

OS was measured in months from the time of randomization to the event date (death) due to any cause. A participant who has not died will be censored at the last known alive date. Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates. Hazard ratio from Cox proportional hazard model stratified by presence of measurable lesions at baseline per IVRS. P-value from log-rank test stratified by presence of measurable lesions at baseline per IVRS.

Time frame: Time between the date of randomization and the date of death due to any cause (up to up to 17Jun2019, approximately 5 years)

Population: All Randomized Participants in Cohort 2

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort 1: Arm N1+I3Overall Survival (OS) for Cohort 29.77 Months
Cohort 1: Arm N3Overall Survival (OS) for Cohort 210.05 Months
p-value: 0.379195% CI: [0.89, 1.36]log-rank test stratified
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d

The percentage of participants who experienced an adverse event by worst grade in each treatment arm. Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. MedDRA Version: 24.1

Time frame: From first dose to 30 days post last dose (up to approximately 34 months).

Population: All Treated Participants in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: Arm N1+I3Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 210.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N1+I3Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 420.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N1+I3Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 370.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N1+I3Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 10 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N1+I3Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 50 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N3Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 120.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N3Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 230.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N3Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 50 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N3Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 410.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N3Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 340.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1b: Arm N3+I1Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 225.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1b: Arm N3+I1Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 350.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1b: Arm N3+I1Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 15.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1b: Arm N3+I1Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 420.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1b: Arm N3+I1Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 50 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 422.6 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 16.5 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 50 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 212.9 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 358.1 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 113.3 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 226.7 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 420.0 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 333.3 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 53.3 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 410.7 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 228.6 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 13.6 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 53.6 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 350.0 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 335.7 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 421.4 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 50 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 225.0 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 117.9 Percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation by Worst CTC Grade for All Treated Participants in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d Who Permanently Discontinued Study Medication Prior to Completing Four Doses

The percentage of participants who experienced a drug-related adverse event leading to drug discontinuation by worst grade (grade 5 being the worst) prior to complete four-dose treatment. Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. MedDRA Version: 24.1

Time frame: Includes events reported between first dose and 30 days after last dose of study therapy (up to 3 doses, up to approximately 2 months)

Population: All Treated Participants in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d Who Permanently Discontinued Study Medication Prior to Completing Four Doses

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: Arm N1+I3Percentage of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation by Worst CTC Grade for All Treated Participants in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d Who Permanently Discontinued Study Medication Prior to Completing Four DosesGrade 316.7 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N1+I3Percentage of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation by Worst CTC Grade for All Treated Participants in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d Who Permanently Discontinued Study Medication Prior to Completing Four DosesGrade 10 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N1+I3Percentage of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation by Worst CTC Grade for All Treated Participants in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d Who Permanently Discontinued Study Medication Prior to Completing Four DosesGrade 50 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N1+I3Percentage of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation by Worst CTC Grade for All Treated Participants in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d Who Permanently Discontinued Study Medication Prior to Completing Four DosesGrade 20 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N1+I3Percentage of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation by Worst CTC Grade for All Treated Participants in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d Who Permanently Discontinued Study Medication Prior to Completing Four DosesGrade 433.3 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N3Percentage of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation by Worst CTC Grade for All Treated Participants in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d Who Permanently Discontinued Study Medication Prior to Completing Four DosesGrade 30 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N3Percentage of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation by Worst CTC Grade for All Treated Participants in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d Who Permanently Discontinued Study Medication Prior to Completing Four DosesGrade 20 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N3Percentage of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation by Worst CTC Grade for All Treated Participants in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d Who Permanently Discontinued Study Medication Prior to Completing Four DosesGrade 40 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N3Percentage of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation by Worst CTC Grade for All Treated Participants in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d Who Permanently Discontinued Study Medication Prior to Completing Four DosesGrade 10 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N3Percentage of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation by Worst CTC Grade for All Treated Participants in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d Who Permanently Discontinued Study Medication Prior to Completing Four DosesGrade 50 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1b: Arm N3+I1Percentage of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation by Worst CTC Grade for All Treated Participants in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d Who Permanently Discontinued Study Medication Prior to Completing Four DosesGrade 50 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1b: Arm N3+I1Percentage of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation by Worst CTC Grade for All Treated Participants in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d Who Permanently Discontinued Study Medication Prior to Completing Four DosesGrade 20 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1b: Arm N3+I1Percentage of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation by Worst CTC Grade for All Treated Participants in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d Who Permanently Discontinued Study Medication Prior to Completing Four DosesGrade 10 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1b: Arm N3+I1Percentage of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation by Worst CTC Grade for All Treated Participants in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d Who Permanently Discontinued Study Medication Prior to Completing Four DosesGrade 30 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1b: Arm N3+I1Percentage of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation by Worst CTC Grade for All Treated Participants in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d Who Permanently Discontinued Study Medication Prior to Completing Four DosesGrade 40 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation by Worst CTC Grade for All Treated Participants in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d Who Permanently Discontinued Study Medication Prior to Completing Four DosesGrade 366.7 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation by Worst CTC Grade for All Treated Participants in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d Who Permanently Discontinued Study Medication Prior to Completing Four DosesGrade 10 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation by Worst CTC Grade for All Treated Participants in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d Who Permanently Discontinued Study Medication Prior to Completing Four DosesGrade 20 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation by Worst CTC Grade for All Treated Participants in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d Who Permanently Discontinued Study Medication Prior to Completing Four DosesGrade 40 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation by Worst CTC Grade for All Treated Participants in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d Who Permanently Discontinued Study Medication Prior to Completing Four DosesGrade 50 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation by Worst CTC Grade for All Treated Participants in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d Who Permanently Discontinued Study Medication Prior to Completing Four DosesGrade 10 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation by Worst CTC Grade for All Treated Participants in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d Who Permanently Discontinued Study Medication Prior to Completing Four DosesGrade 50 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation by Worst CTC Grade for All Treated Participants in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d Who Permanently Discontinued Study Medication Prior to Completing Four DosesGrade 30 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation by Worst CTC Grade for All Treated Participants in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d Who Permanently Discontinued Study Medication Prior to Completing Four DosesGrade 40 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation by Worst CTC Grade for All Treated Participants in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d Who Permanently Discontinued Study Medication Prior to Completing Four DosesGrade 20 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation by Worst CTC Grade for All Treated Participants in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d Who Permanently Discontinued Study Medication Prior to Completing Four DosesGrade 10 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation by Worst CTC Grade for All Treated Participants in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d Who Permanently Discontinued Study Medication Prior to Completing Four DosesGrade 50 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation by Worst CTC Grade for All Treated Participants in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d Who Permanently Discontinued Study Medication Prior to Completing Four DosesGrade 40 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation by Worst CTC Grade for All Treated Participants in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d Who Permanently Discontinued Study Medication Prior to Completing Four DosesGrade 20 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation by Worst CTC Grade for All Treated Participants in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d Who Permanently Discontinued Study Medication Prior to Completing Four DosesGrade 30 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation by Worst CTC Grade for All Treated Participants in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d Who Permanently Discontinued Study Medication Prior to Completing Four DosesGrade 40 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation by Worst CTC Grade for All Treated Participants in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d Who Permanently Discontinued Study Medication Prior to Completing Four DosesGrade 20 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation by Worst CTC Grade for All Treated Participants in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d Who Permanently Discontinued Study Medication Prior to Completing Four DosesGrade 350.0 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation by Worst CTC Grade for All Treated Participants in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d Who Permanently Discontinued Study Medication Prior to Completing Four DosesGrade 10 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation by Worst CTC Grade for All Treated Participants in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d Who Permanently Discontinued Study Medication Prior to Completing Four DosesGrade 50 Percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d

The percentage of participants who experienced a serious adverse event by worst grade in each treatment arm. Toxicities were graded using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. MedDRA Version: 24.1

Time frame: From first dose to 30 days post last dose (up to approximately 34 months).

Population: All Treated Participants in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: Arm N1+I3Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 360.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N1+I3Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 10 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N1+I3Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 50 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N1+I3Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 20 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N1+I3Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 420.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N3Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 340.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N3Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 210.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N3Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 40 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N3Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 10 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N3Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 50 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1b: Arm N3+I1Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 50 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1b: Arm N3+I1Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 25.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1b: Arm N3+I1Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 10 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1b: Arm N3+I1Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 335.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1b: Arm N3+I1Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 415.0 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 345.2 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 13.2 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 20 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 416.1 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 50 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 10 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 53.3 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 316.7 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 416.7 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 216.7 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 10 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 53.6 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 43.6 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 23.6 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 335.7 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 414.3 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 210.7 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 332.1 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 10 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (Worst Grade) in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dGrade 50 Percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d

The percentage of participants who experienced a laboratory abnormality of the liver in each treatment arm. MedDRA Version: 24.1 Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) Upper Limit of Normal (ULN) Denominator corresponds to participants with at least on one treatment measurement of the corresponding laboratory parameter. Includes laboratory results reported after the first dose and within 30 days of last dose of study therapy.

Time frame: From first dose to 30 days post last dose (up to approximately 34 months).

Population: All Treated Subjects in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d with at least one on-treatment measurement of the corresponding laboratory parameter

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: Arm N1+I3Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT OR AST > 20*ULN10.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N1+I3Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT OR AST > 10*ULN10.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N1+I3Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT or AST > 3*ULN w/ Tbili > 2*ULN within 30 days10.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N1+I3Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT or AST > 3xULN w/ Tbili > 2*ULN within 1 day10.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N1+I3Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT or AST > 3*ULN w/ Tbili > 1.5*ULN within 30 days10.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N1+I3Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT or AST > 3xULN w/ Tbili > 1.5*ULN within 1 day10.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N1+I3Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALP > 1.5*ULN10.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N1+I3Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT OR AST > 5*ULN20.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N1+I3Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT OR AST > 3*ULN30.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N1+I3Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTOTAL BILIRUBIN (Tbili) > 2*ULN10.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N3Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT OR AST > 5*ULN0.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N3Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT OR AST > 3*ULN0.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N3Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT OR AST > 10*ULN0.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N3Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT OR AST > 20*ULN0.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N3Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTOTAL BILIRUBIN (Tbili) > 2*ULN0.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N3Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALP > 1.5*ULN10.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N3Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT or AST > 3xULN w/ Tbili > 1.5*ULN within 1 day0.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N3Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT or AST > 3*ULN w/ Tbili > 1.5*ULN within 30 days0.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N3Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT or AST > 3xULN w/ Tbili > 2*ULN within 1 day0.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N3Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT or AST > 3*ULN w/ Tbili > 2*ULN within 30 days0.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1b: Arm N3+I1Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT or AST > 3xULN w/ Tbili > 2*ULN within 1 day0.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1b: Arm N3+I1Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT or AST > 3xULN w/ Tbili > 1.5*ULN within 1 day0.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1b: Arm N3+I1Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT OR AST > 5*ULN10.5 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1b: Arm N3+I1Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTOTAL BILIRUBIN (Tbili) > 2*ULN0.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1b: Arm N3+I1Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT or AST > 3*ULN w/ Tbili > 1.5*ULN within 30 days0.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1b: Arm N3+I1Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT OR AST > 3*ULN15.8 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1b: Arm N3+I1Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT OR AST > 10*ULN5.3 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1b: Arm N3+I1Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT or AST > 3*ULN w/ Tbili > 2*ULN within 30 days0.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1b: Arm N3+I1Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALP > 1.5*ULN0.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1b: Arm N3+I1Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT OR AST > 20*ULN5.3 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT OR AST > 5*ULN12.9 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT OR AST > 3*ULN22.6 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT OR AST > 20*ULN3.2 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT or AST > 3*ULN w/ Tbili > 2*ULN within 30 days0.0 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTOTAL BILIRUBIN (Tbili) > 2*ULN0.0 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT or AST > 3xULN w/ Tbili > 1.5*ULN within 1 day0.0 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT or AST > 3*ULN w/ Tbili > 1.5*ULN within 30 days0.0 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALP > 1.5*ULN0.0 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT or AST > 3xULN w/ Tbili > 2*ULN within 1 day0.0 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT OR AST > 10*ULN6.5 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT OR AST > 3*ULN10.0 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT or AST > 3*ULN w/ Tbili > 1.5*ULN within 30 days0.0 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT OR AST > 10*ULN3.3 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTOTAL BILIRUBIN (Tbili) > 2*ULN0.0 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT OR AST > 5*ULN3.3 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALP > 1.5*ULN3.3 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT or AST > 3xULN w/ Tbili > 2*ULN within 1 day0.0 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT or AST > 3xULN w/ Tbili > 1.5*ULN within 1 day0.0 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT OR AST > 20*ULN3.3 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT or AST > 3*ULN w/ Tbili > 2*ULN within 30 days0.0 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT or AST > 3*ULN w/ Tbili > 2*ULN within 30 days3.7 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT OR AST > 20*ULN0.0 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTOTAL BILIRUBIN (Tbili) > 2*ULN7.4 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALP > 1.5*ULN0.0 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT OR AST > 3*ULN18.5 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT or AST > 3xULN w/ Tbili > 1.5*ULN within 1 day3.7 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT or AST > 3*ULN w/ Tbili > 1.5*ULN within 30 days3.7 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT or AST > 3xULN w/ Tbili > 2*ULN within 1 day3.7 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT OR AST > 5*ULN11.1 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT OR AST > 10*ULN3.7 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALP > 1.5*ULN3.7 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT or AST > 3*ULN w/ Tbili > 2*ULN within 30 days0.0 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT OR AST > 20*ULN3.7 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT OR AST > 5*ULN3.7 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT OR AST > 3*ULN14.8 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT or AST > 3xULN w/ Tbili > 2*ULN within 1 day0.0 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTOTAL BILIRUBIN (Tbili) > 2*ULN0.0 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT OR AST > 10*ULN3.7 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT or AST > 3*ULN w/ Tbili > 1.5*ULN within 30 days0.0 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Liver Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dALT or AST > 3xULN w/ Tbili > 1.5*ULN within 1 day0.0 Percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d

The percentage of participants who experienced a laboratory abnormality of the thyroid in each treatment arm. MedDRA Version: 24.1 Free T3 (FT3) Free T4 (FT4) Lower Limit of Normal (LLN) (A) Within a 2-week window after the abnormal TSH test date. (B) Includes participants with TSH abnormality and with no FT3/FT4 test values in the 2-week window or with non-abnormal value(s) from only one of the two tests and no value from the other test.

Time frame: From first dose to 30 days post last dose (up to approximately 34 months).

Population: All Treated Subjects in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1d with at Least One On-Treatment TSH measurement

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: Arm N1+I3Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH > ULN, WITH ALL OTHER FT3/FT4 TEST >= LLN0.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N1+I3Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH > ULN, WITH AT LEAST ONE FT3/FT4 TEST < LLN20.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N1+I3Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH < LLN, WITH FT3/FT4 TEST MISSING10.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N1+I3Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH < LLN, WITH ALL OTHER FT3/FT4 TEST <= ULN20.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N1+I3Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH<LLN, LLN WITH AT LEAST ONE FT3/FT4 TEST>ULN30.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N1+I3Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH < LLN, WITH TSH >= LLN AT BASELINE60.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N1+I3Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH < LLN60.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N1+I3Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH > ULN, WITH TSH <= ULN AT BASELINE20.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N1+I3Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH > ULN20.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N1+I3Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH > ULN, WITH FT3/FT4 TEST MISSING0.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N3Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH > ULN, WITH TSH <= ULN AT BASELINE30.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N3Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH > ULN50.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N3Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH > ULN, WITH AT LEAST ONE FT3/FT4 TEST < LLN30.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N3Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH > ULN, WITH ALL OTHER FT3/FT4 TEST >= LLN10.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N3Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH > ULN, WITH FT3/FT4 TEST MISSING10.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N3Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH < LLN30.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N3Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH < LLN, WITH TSH >= LLN AT BASELINE30.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N3Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH<LLN, LLN WITH AT LEAST ONE FT3/FT4 TEST>ULN10.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N3Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH < LLN, WITH ALL OTHER FT3/FT4 TEST <= ULN20.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N3Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH < LLN, WITH FT3/FT4 TEST MISSING0.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1b: Arm N3+I1Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH < LLN, WITH ALL OTHER FT3/FT4 TEST <= ULN10.5 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1b: Arm N3+I1Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH < LLN, WITH TSH >= LLN AT BASELINE31.6 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1b: Arm N3+I1Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH > ULN, WITH TSH <= ULN AT BASELINE10.5 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1b: Arm N3+I1Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH > ULN, WITH FT3/FT4 TEST MISSING0.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1b: Arm N3+I1Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH<LLN, LLN WITH AT LEAST ONE FT3/FT4 TEST>ULN15.8 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1b: Arm N3+I1Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH > ULN10.5 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1b: Arm N3+I1Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH > ULN, WITH AT LEAST ONE FT3/FT4 TEST < LLN10.5 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1b: Arm N3+I1Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH < LLN, WITH FT3/FT4 TEST MISSING5.3 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1b: Arm N3+I1Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH < LLN31.6 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1b: Arm N3+I1Percentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH > ULN, WITH ALL OTHER FT3/FT4 TEST >= LLN0.0 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH > ULN, WITH TSH <= ULN AT BASELINE20.0 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH > ULN23.3 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH > ULN, WITH ALL OTHER FT3/FT4 TEST >= LLN6.7 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH < LLN, WITH FT3/FT4 TEST MISSING3.3 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH > ULN, WITH FT3/FT4 TEST MISSING3.3 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH < LLN, WITH TSH >= LLN AT BASELINE33.3 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH<LLN, LLN WITH AT LEAST ONE FT3/FT4 TEST>ULN10.0 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH < LLN43.3 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH < LLN, WITH ALL OTHER FT3/FT4 TEST <= ULN30.0 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH > ULN, WITH AT LEAST ONE FT3/FT4 TEST < LLN13.3 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH > ULN16.7 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH<LLN, LLN WITH AT LEAST ONE FT3/FT4 TEST>ULN13.3 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH > ULN, WITH AT LEAST ONE FT3/FT4 TEST < LLN13.3 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH > ULN, WITH FT3/FT4 TEST MISSING3.3 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH > ULN, WITH TSH <= ULN AT BASELINE16.7 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH < LLN40.0 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH < LLN, WITH ALL OTHER FT3/FT4 TEST <= ULN16.7 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH < LLN, WITH TSH >= LLN AT BASELINE40.0 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH > ULN, WITH ALL OTHER FT3/FT4 TEST >= LLN0.0 Percentage of participants
Part A Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH < LLN, WITH FT3/FT4 TEST MISSING10.0 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH < LLN, WITH FT3/FT4 TEST MISSING0.0 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH > ULN, WITH ALL OTHER FT3/FT4 TEST >= LLN3.7 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH > ULN, WITH FT3/FT4 TEST MISSING0.0 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH < LLN22.2 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH > ULN11.1 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH < LLN, WITH TSH >= LLN AT BASELINE18.5 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH<LLN, LLN WITH AT LEAST ONE FT3/FT4 TEST>ULN11.1 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH < LLN, WITH ALL OTHER FT3/FT4 TEST <= ULN11.1 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH > ULN, WITH TSH <= ULN AT BASELINE11.1 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH > ULN, WITH AT LEAST ONE FT3/FT4 TEST < LLN7.4 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH < LLN33.3 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH < LLN, WITH FT3/FT4 TEST MISSING3.7 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH > ULN, WITH ALL OTHER FT3/FT4 TEST >= LLN7.4 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH > ULN, WITH TSH <= ULN AT BASELINE7.4 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH > ULN7.4 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH < LLN, WITH ALL OTHER FT3/FT4 TEST <= ULN29.6 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH > ULN, WITH FT3/FT4 TEST MISSING0.0 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH > ULN, WITH AT LEAST ONE FT3/FT4 TEST < LLN0.0 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH<LLN, LLN WITH AT LEAST ONE FT3/FT4 TEST>ULN0.0 Percentage of participants
Part B Cohort 1d: Arm N3+RTPercentage of Participants With Specific Laboratory Abnormalities in Thyroid Tests in Cohorts 1, 1b, 1c and 1dTSH < LLN, WITH TSH >= LLN AT BASELINE18.5 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Objective Response Rate (ORR) for Cohort 2

ORR was measured by the percentage of participants whose best overall response (BOR) is confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) divided by response evaluable participants. The best overall response (BOR) is determined once all the data for the participant is known. BOR is defined as the best response designation, as determined by investigators, recorded between the date of randomization and the date of objectively documented progression per RANO criteria, the date of subsequent therapy, or date of surgical resection, whichever occurs first. Confidence interval based on the Clopper and Pearson method. For the comparison of the odds ratio of Nivolumab over Bevacizumab, the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) method of weighting was utilized.

Time frame: Time from randomization to the date of the first documented tumor progression or death due to any cause (up to approximately 10 years and 5 months)

Population: All Response Evaluable Participants in Cohort 2

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: Arm N1+I3Objective Response Rate (ORR) for Cohort 27.8 Percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Arm N3Objective Response Rate (ORR) for Cohort 223.1 Percentage of participants
95% CI: [0.15, 0.59]
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS) at 12 Months for Cohort 2

OS(12) is measured as the percentage of participants alive at 12 months per Kaplan-Meier curve of OS. Z test with variance estimation based on Greenwood formula using log(-log) transformation.

Time frame: From randomization to 12 months following randomization

Population: All Randomized Participants in Cohort 2

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: Arm N1+I3Overall Survival (OS) at 12 Months for Cohort 241.8 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 1: Arm N3Overall Survival (OS) at 12 Months for Cohort 242.4 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.920895% CI: [-10.8, 9.7]Z test with variance estimation based on
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS) for Cohorts 1c and 1d

OS was measured in months from the time of randomization (Part B) or time of treatment (Part A) to the event date (death) due to any cause. A participant who has not died will be censored at the last known alive date. Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates.

Time frame: Time between the date of randomization and the date of death due to any cause (up to approximately 10 years and 5 months)

Population: All Randomized (Part B) or Treated (Part A) Participants in Cohorts 1c and 1d

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort 1: Arm N1+I3Overall Survival (OS) for Cohorts 1c and 1d22.08 Months
Cohort 1: Arm N3Overall Survival (OS) for Cohorts 1c and 1d14.41 Months
Cohort 1b: Arm N3+I1Overall Survival (OS) for Cohorts 1c and 1d15.95 Months
Part A Cohort 1c: Arm N3+RT+TMZOverall Survival (OS) for Cohorts 1c and 1d13.96 Months
Secondary

Progression Free Survival (PFS) for Cohort 2

PFS was measured in months from the time of randomization to the date of the first documented tumor progression or death due to any cause. Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates. Hazard ratio from Cox proportional hazard model stratified by presence of measurable lesions at baseline per IVRS.

Time frame: Time from randomization to the date of the first documented tumor progression or death due to any cause (up to approximately 10 years and 5 months)

Population: All Randomized Participants in Cohort 2

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort 1: Arm N1+I3Progression Free Survival (PFS) for Cohort 21.51 Months
Cohort 1: Arm N3Progression Free Survival (PFS) for Cohort 23.61 Months
95% CI: [1.5, 2.35]
Post Hoc

Overall Survival (OS) for Cohort 2 - Extended Collection

OS was measured in months from the time of randomization to the event date (death) due to any cause. A participant who has not died will be censored at the last known alive date. Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates. Hazard ratio from Cox proportional hazard model stratified by presence of measurable lesions at baseline per IVRS. P-value from log-rank test stratified by presence of measurable lesions at baseline per IVRS.

Time frame: Time between the date of randomization and the date of death due to any cause (up to approximately 10 years and 5 months)

Population: All Randomized Participants in Cohort 2

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort 1: Arm N1+I3Overall Survival (OS) for Cohort 2 - Extended Collection9.77 Months
Cohort 1: Arm N3Overall Survival (OS) for Cohort 2 - Extended Collection10.05 Months
p-value: 0.379195% CI: [0.89, 1.36]log-rank test stratified

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026