Skip to content

Insulin-sensitive Obesity: Lessons From Longitudinal Data

Insulin-sensitive Obesity: Prospective and Interventional Studies

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02017210
Acronym
ISOS
Enrollment
57
Registered
2013-12-20
Start date
2013-11-30
Completion date
2016-02-29
Last updated
2020-02-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Insulin Sensitivity/Resistance, Obesity

Keywords

Hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp, Body fat composition, Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, Obesity, Insulin resistance

Brief summary

People who are overweight and/or obese are at risk of insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. However, research has shown that some overweight and/or obese individuals remain insulin-sensitive and metabolically healthy despite their unhealthy body weight. The investigators hypothesise that overweight and/or obese people who were deemed insulin-sensitive in previous studies will maintain their insulin sensitivity and metabolic health over time. The investigators also hypothesise that the preservation of insulin sensitivity will be accompanied by key metabolic health markers.

Detailed description

While obesity is a risk factor for metabolic disease, sub cohorts with obesity not complicated by the metabolic syndrome have been described. These so called metabolically healthy obese may have reduced risk of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality compared with individuals with obesity who present with components of the metabolic syndrome. Longitudinal studies with diabetes and cardiovascular disease risk endpoints reported that individuals with obesity who are metabolically healthy (MHO) held an intermediate health status, such that they were still worse off than the healthy normal-weight individuals. While there have been studies evaluating the stability of the MHO phenotype over time, no study has reported the durability of insulin-sensitivity per se, as measured by the gold-standard hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp. In the present study, we aimed to trace the change in insulin resistance/sensitivity, and to uncover predictors of insulin resistance in older age. The secondary aims were to trace the change in body composition, fat distribution and metabolic markers over time in a well-phenotyped cohort studied approximately 5-6 years apart.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

The University of Hong Kong
CollaboratorOTHER
Life for a Child Program, Diabetes Australia
CollaboratorOTHER
The University of New South Wales
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Sydney
CollaboratorOTHER
St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney
CollaboratorOTHER
Garvan Institute of Medical Research
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
26 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Participation in two previous studies conducted at the Garvan Institute of Medical Research Clinical Research Facility (described in the other publications 1-3). * Willingness to give written informed consent and willingness to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant and/or lactating women.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Insulin Sensitivity6 yearsThe change in insulin sensitivity (as measured by M-value normalised to insulin from hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp) was determined Follow-up Value - Baseline Value /Time between measurements. There were 2 time points 6 years apart

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Waist Circumference6 yearsChange in waist circumference was determined as Follow-up Value - Baseline Value /Time between measurements. There were 2 time points 6 years apart
Body Fat Mass6 yearsBody fat mass from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) change was determined as Follow-up Value - Baseline Value /Time between measurements. There were 2 time points 6 years apart
Body FFM6 yearsBody fat-free mass (FFM) from DXA change was determined as Follow-up Value - Baseline Value /Time between measurements. There were 2 time points 6 years apart
Visceral Fat Volume6 yearsAbdominal visceral fat volume from DXA change was determined as Follow-up Value - Baseline Value /Time between measurements. There were 2 time points 6 years apart
Body Mass Index6 yearsChange in body mass index (BMI) was determined as Follow-up Value - Baseline Value /Time between measurements. There were 2 time points 6 years apart
Diastolic Blood Pressure6 yearsChange in Diastolic Blood Pressure was determined as Follow-up Value - Baseline Value /Time between measurements. There were 2 time points 6 years apart
Fasting Blood Glucose6 yearsChange in fasting blood glucose was determined as Follow-up Value - Baseline Value /Time between measurements. There were 2 time points 6 years apart
Fasting Serum Insulin6 yearsChange in fasting serum insulin was determined as Follow-up Value - Baseline Value /Time between measurements. There were 2 time points 6 years apart
Systolic Blood Pressure6 yearsChange in Systolic Blood Pressure was determined as Follow-up Value - Baseline Value /Time between measurements. There were 2 time points 6 years apart

Countries

Australia

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Lean/Normal Weight
Individuals with body mass index (BMI)\<25 kg/m\^2 in the baseline study
17
Overweight/Obese Insulin-Sensitive
Individuals with BMI\>25 kg/m\^2 who were deemed insulin-sensitive at the baseline study
20
Overweight/Obese Insulin-Resistant
Individuals with BMI\>25 kg/m\^2 who were deemed insulin-resistant at the baseline study
20
Total57

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLean/Normal WeightTotalOverweight/Obese Insulin-ResistantOverweight/Obese Insulin-Sensitive
Age, Continuous54.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1
57.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6
63.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7
54.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants3 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
16 Participants54 Participants19 Participants19 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
17 Participants99 Participants20 Participants20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants27 Participants12 Participants9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants30 Participants8 Participants11 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 00 / 00 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Insulin Sensitivity

The change in insulin sensitivity (as measured by M-value normalised to insulin from hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp) was determined Follow-up Value - Baseline Value /Time between measurements. There were 2 time points 6 years apart

Time frame: 6 years

Population: The hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp was performed in a sub-cohort of n=9, 10 and 16 participants who were normal-weight, overweight/obese insulin-sensitive and overweight/obese insulin-resistant, respectively

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Lean/Normal WeightInsulin Sensitivity0.0105 micro mol/min/Kg/mU/L/year
Overweight/Obese Insulin-SensitiveInsulin Sensitivity-0.0076 micro mol/min/Kg/mU/L/year
Overweight/Obese Insulin-ResistantInsulin Sensitivity0.0041 micro mol/min/Kg/mU/L/year
Secondary

Body Fat Mass

Body fat mass from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) change was determined as Follow-up Value - Baseline Value /Time between measurements. There were 2 time points 6 years apart

Time frame: 6 years

Population: DXA was performed in a sub-cohort of n=11, 11 and 19 in normal weight, overweight/obese insulin-sensitive and overweight/obese insulin-resistant participants, respectively

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Lean/Normal WeightBody Fat Mass0.2281 % of total body mass/year
Overweight/Obese Insulin-SensitiveBody Fat Mass0.3696 % of total body mass/year
Overweight/Obese Insulin-ResistantBody Fat Mass0.3478 % of total body mass/year
Secondary

Body FFM

Body fat-free mass (FFM) from DXA change was determined as Follow-up Value - Baseline Value /Time between measurements. There were 2 time points 6 years apart

Time frame: 6 years

Population: DXA was performed in a sub-cohort of n=11, 11 and 19 in normal weight, overweight/obese insulin-sensitive and overweight/obese insulin-resistant participants, respectively

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Lean/Normal WeightBody FFM-0.0382 kg/year
Overweight/Obese Insulin-SensitiveBody FFM-0.1786 kg/year
Overweight/Obese Insulin-ResistantBody FFM-0.4017 kg/year
Secondary

Body Mass Index

Change in body mass index (BMI) was determined as Follow-up Value - Baseline Value /Time between measurements. There were 2 time points 6 years apart

Time frame: 6 years

Population: All individuals who were followed up after 6 years were analyzed

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Lean/Normal WeightBody Mass Index0.0526 kg/m^2/year
Overweight/Obese Insulin-SensitiveBody Mass Index0.0941 kg/m^2/year
Overweight/Obese Insulin-ResistantBody Mass Index0.0088 kg/m^2/year
Secondary

Diastolic Blood Pressure

Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure was determined as Follow-up Value - Baseline Value /Time between measurements. There were 2 time points 6 years apart

Time frame: 6 years

Population: All individuals who were followed up after 6 years were analyzed

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Lean/Normal WeightDiastolic Blood Pressure1.1290 mmHg/year
Overweight/Obese Insulin-SensitiveDiastolic Blood Pressure0.4117 mmHg/year
Overweight/Obese Insulin-ResistantDiastolic Blood Pressure0.5662 mmHg/year
Secondary

Fasting Blood Glucose

Change in fasting blood glucose was determined as Follow-up Value - Baseline Value /Time between measurements. There were 2 time points 6 years apart

Time frame: 6 years

Population: Fasting blood glucose concentration measure was available in a sub-cohort of n=16, 18 and 19 in normal weight, overweight/obese insulin-sensitive and overweight/obese insulin-resistant participants, respectively

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Lean/Normal WeightFasting Blood Glucose-0.0151 mmol/L/year
Overweight/Obese Insulin-SensitiveFasting Blood Glucose0.0062 mmol/L/year
Overweight/Obese Insulin-ResistantFasting Blood Glucose-0.0254 mmol/L/year
Secondary

Fasting Serum Insulin

Change in fasting serum insulin was determined as Follow-up Value - Baseline Value /Time between measurements. There were 2 time points 6 years apart

Time frame: 6 years

Population: Fasting serum insulin measurement was available in a sub-cohort of n=16, 18 and 19 in normal weight, overweight/obese insulin-sensitive and overweight/obese insulin-resistant participants, respectively

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Lean/Normal WeightFasting Serum Insulin0.2223 mU/L/year
Overweight/Obese Insulin-SensitiveFasting Serum Insulin0.0855 mU/L/year
Overweight/Obese Insulin-ResistantFasting Serum Insulin-0.2370 mU/L/year
Secondary

Systolic Blood Pressure

Change in Systolic Blood Pressure was determined as Follow-up Value - Baseline Value /Time between measurements. There were 2 time points 6 years apart

Time frame: 6 years

Population: All individuals who were followed up after 6 years were analyzed

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Lean/Normal WeightSystolic Blood Pressure0.3704 mmHg/year
Overweight/Obese Insulin-SensitiveSystolic Blood Pressure0.9483 mmHg/year
Overweight/Obese Insulin-ResistantSystolic Blood Pressure1.3593 mmHg/year
Secondary

Visceral Fat Volume

Abdominal visceral fat volume from DXA change was determined as Follow-up Value - Baseline Value /Time between measurements. There were 2 time points 6 years apart

Time frame: 6 years

Population: Visceral fat volume was available in n=11, 10 and 18 normal weight, overweight/obese insulin-sensitive and overweight/obese insulin-resistant participants who undergone a DXA measure due to technical reasons

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Lean/Normal WeightVisceral Fat Volume13.3962 cm^3/year
Overweight/Obese Insulin-SensitiveVisceral Fat Volume47.3351 cm^3/year
Overweight/Obese Insulin-ResistantVisceral Fat Volume46.2974 cm^3/year
Secondary

Waist Circumference

Change in waist circumference was determined as Follow-up Value - Baseline Value /Time between measurements. There were 2 time points 6 years apart

Time frame: 6 years

Population: All individuals who were followed up after 6 years were analyzed

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Lean/Normal WeightWaist Circumference0.5263 cm/year
Overweight/Obese Insulin-SensitiveWaist Circumference0.4894 cm/year
Overweight/Obese Insulin-ResistantWaist Circumference0.0000 cm/year

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026