Skip to content

The Effect of Sponge Versus No-Sponge Placement of Mitomycin-C on the Outcomes of Trabeculectomy With Ex-PRESS Glaucoma Filtration Device

The Effect of Sponge Versus No-Sponge Placement of Mitomycin-C on the Outcomes of Trabeculectomy With Ex-PRESS Glaucoma Filtration Device

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02016898
Enrollment
100
Registered
2013-12-20
Start date
2014-03-31
Completion date
2017-01-17
Last updated
2018-02-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Primary Open Angle Glaucoma

Keywords

Primary open angle glaucoma, trabeculectomy, mitomycin-C, express mini-shunt

Brief summary

The primary focus of this study is to assess intraocular pressure and complication rates between patients who receive mitomycin-C using a sponge versus no-sponge.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPlacement of the sponge

Sponsors

Duke University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Men or women aged 18 years and older at screening. 2. Diagnosis of chronic angle-closure glaucoma or open-angle glaucoma, phakic or pseudophakic, with visual field or optic disc changes characteristic of glaucoma. 3. Suitable candidate for trabeculectomy with Ex-PRESS glaucoma filtration device with MMC in the superonasal quadrant in the study eye which the physician deems as medically necessary. 4. Capable and willing to provide consent

Exclusion criteria

1. Unable or unwilling to provide consent 2. Any previous ocular surgeries in the study eye preventing placement of the trabeculectomy with Ex-PRESS glaucoma filtration device with mitomycin-C in the superonasal quadrant 3. Any previous glaucoma drainage devices in the study eye 4. Any abnormality other than glaucoma in the study eye that could affect applanation tonometry. 5. Presence or history of any abnormality or disorder that could interfere with the study procedure or prevent the successful completion of the study. 6. Presence or history of uveitis within 10 years or any other ocular infection or inflammation within 14 days before day 1. 7. Any significant unstable cardiovascular, hepatic, renal, respiratory, gastrointestinal, endocrine, immunologic, dermatologic, hematologic, neurologic, or psychiatric disease. 8. Known Pregnancy or Breastfeeding Physical and Laboratory Findings 9. Conjunctival scarring precluding a superonasal implantation location. 10. Vitreous in the anterior chamber. 11. Abnormality preventing reliable applanation tonometry in the study eye.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Complication Ratespost-operative day 1 to month 6To assess complication rates between patients who receive mitomycin-C using a sponge versus irrigation

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Intraocular Pressurepost-operative day 1 to month 6To assess final intraocular pressure lowering between patients who receive mitomycin-C using a sponge versus irrigation

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Two subjects were retroactively removed due to not satisfying the inclusion/exclusion criteria. An additional three subjects had uncertain group allocation due to clerical errors.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Sponge Placement of Mitomycin-C
Randomization will be stratified by age (age ≥65 or age \< 65), baseline IOP (IOP ≥ 28 mmHg or IOP \< 28 mmHg), and concurrent cataract surgery. Placement of the sponge Mitomycin-C
50
Irrigation Placement of Mitomycin-C
Randomization will be stratified by age (age ≥65 or age \< 65), baseline IOP (IOP ≥ 28 mmHg or IOP \< 28 mmHg), and concurrent cataract surgery. Irrigation placement Mitomycin-C
45
Total95

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath11
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up44

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSponge Placement of Mitomycin-CTotalIrrigation Placement of Mitomycin-C
Age, Continuous68 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6
70.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3
73.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
26 Participants42 Participants16 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
23 Participants46 Participants23 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
50 participants95 participants45 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
30 Participants53 Participants23 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
20 Participants42 Participants22 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 501 / 45
other
Total, other adverse events
29 / 5028 / 45
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 500 / 45

Outcome results

Primary

Complication Rates

To assess complication rates between patients who receive mitomycin-C using a sponge versus irrigation

Time frame: post-operative day 1 to month 6

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Sponge Placement of Mitomycin-CComplication Rates29 Participants
Irrigation Placement of MMCComplication Rates28 Participants
p-value: 0.795% CI: [0.67, 1.29]Chi-squared
Secondary

Change in Intraocular Pressure

To assess final intraocular pressure lowering between patients who receive mitomycin-C using a sponge versus irrigation

Time frame: post-operative day 1 to month 6

Population: Five participants in each group were not included due to being lost to follow-up or deceased.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sponge Placement of Mitomycin-CChange in Intraocular Pressure-8.4 mmHg (millimeters of mercury)Standard Deviation 1.6
Irrigation Placement of MMCChange in Intraocular Pressure-8.2 mmHg (millimeters of mercury)Standard Deviation 1.2
p-value: 0.539t-test, 1 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026