Skip to content

A Trial of the Efficacy and Safety of Topical Nitric Oxide in Patients With Anogenital Warts

A Randomised, Multicentre, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Dose-ranging Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Three Dose Regimens of Topical Nitric Oxide in Patients With Anogenital Warts

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02015260
Enrollment
299
Registered
2013-12-19
Start date
2001-09-30
Completion date
2003-05-31
Last updated
2017-05-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anogenital Warts, Condylomata Acuminata

Keywords

human papilloma virus infection, Anogenital warts, condylomata acuminata

Brief summary

Objective To assess the efficacy of the topical application of Nitric Oxide, delivered using acidified nitrite. Design Multicentre, randomized, controlled, dose ranging trial. A control arm and three doses of acidified nitrite applied topically for 12 weeks with a further 12 weeks of follow up. Setting The trial setting was in European genitourinary medicine clinics Participants Male and female volunteers over 18 years of age with between 2 and 50 ano-genital warts, 328 were screened for eligibility and 299 subjects from 40 centres were randomised. Exclusions Pregnancy; concomitant Sexually Transmitted Disease; internal warts requiring treatment other than surgery /laser; diabetes ; Human Immunodeficiency Virus-positive, immunosuppressed and/or using immunosuppressive therapies; drug abuse. interventions compared * Control Placebo nitrite cream and placebo citric acid cream twice daily * A) 3% sodium nitrite + 4.5% citric acid creams twice daily * B) 6% sodium nitrite + 9% citric acid creams once daily * C) 6% sodium nitrite + 9% citric acid creams twice daily Outcomes * Primary proportion of patients with complete clearance of target warts Secondary * Time to clearance * Wart area * Wart count * Patient and investigator assessment of efficacy * Safety * Tolerability * Adherence

Interventions

Varying doses of sodium nitrite and citric acid co-applied to warts

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo

Sponsors

Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Erasmus Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Aberdeen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Males and females over 18 years of age * 2-50 warts in the anogenital region. * Female patients of child-bearing potential had to be willing to use a non-barrier method of contraception at entry and for the duration of the study. * all patients had to be willing to use barrier protection for the duration of the study. * All patients had to be able to comply with the requirements of the protocol and be likely to return for follow-up visits and had to be contactable for the duration of the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with clinically relevant abnormal haematology or biochemistry results (determined from the sample taken at Visit 1). * Patients who had used an active therapy for anogenital warts within 2 weeks of randomisation to study drug, i.e. Visit 2. * Patients who had used any local supportive medication, including topical corticosteroids or beta-interferon, within 2 weeks of study entry. * Patients who had used medication known to adversely affect their haematology profile, including local anaesthetics (benzocaine, lidocaine, etc), nitrofurantoin, sulphonylureas and sulphonamides within 2 weeks of study entry. \[Word 'adversely' added by Protocol Amendment 2, 7 May 2002.\] * Patients with abnormal anogenital skin, such as eczema, or skin that had not healed following surgery (cryosurgery, laser ablation or similar). * Patients who were known to have a concomitant sexually transmitted disease that inhibited accurate assessment of their warts. * Patients who required treatment other than surgery or laser for internal warts. * Male patients with intra-urethral warts \[deleted by Protocol Amendment 2, 7 May 2002\]. * Patients with diabetes (Type I or Type II diabetes). * Patients who were known to be HIV-positive. * Patients who were known to be immunosuppressed and/or using immunosuppressive therapies. * Patients known to abuse alcohol and/or drugs or with a history of chronic alcohol or drug abuse.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of patients with complete clearance of target warts in Intention to treat (ITT) population24 weeks* Number of and area of target warts (up to 10 selected) at Baseline and Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12/withdrawal/early completion and at follow-up (Weeks 4, 8 and 12 after end of treatment) * Number of warts at Baseline (Week 0) and of remaining baseline warts at Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12/withdrawal/early completion and at Weeks 4, 8 and 12 of follow-up

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total number of warts (baseline and new) at end of treatment12 weeks
Patient assessment of efficacy12 weeksPatient assessment of efficacy (categorised as complete clearance, significant improvement, partial improvement, no change or worsening) at Week 12/withdrawal/early completion
Investigator assessment of efficacy12 weeksInvestigator assessment of efficacy (categorised as complete clearance, significant improvement, partial improvement, no change or worsening) at Week 12/withdrawal/early completion
Investigator assessment of tolerability12 weeksInvestigator assessment of erythema/eschar and oedema (using modified Draize scales from 0 to 4) at Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12/withdrawal/early completion and at follow-up (Weeks 4, 8 and 12 after end of treatment)
Safety of treatment12 weeks and followed upAdverse events throughout treatment period; unresolved events at end of treatment were followed up Heart rate and blood pressure at each visit during treatment Laboratory tests at Screening and Week 12/withdrawal/early completion Physical examination at Screening and at Week 12/withdrawal/early completion.
Patient assessment of tolerability12Patient assessment of itching, pain and burning (categorised as none, mild, moderate or severe) at treatment site at Screening and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12/withdrawal/early completion

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Investigator assessment of staining12 weeksInvestigator assessment of staining (present or absent) at treatment site at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12/withdrawal/early completion

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 5, 2026