Skip to content

Internet-Based Relapse Prevention vs Face to Face Therapy at an Employee Assistance Program

Internet-Based Relapse Prevention With Therapist Support vs Face to Face Therapy at an Employee Assistance Program: A Randomized Controlled Non-inferiority Trial

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02014779
Acronym
FoBeMA
Enrollment
1
Registered
2013-12-18
Start date
2014-01-31
Completion date
2016-03-31
Last updated
2016-03-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alcohol Abuse, Alcohol Addiction

Keywords

Randomized Controlled Trial, Alcohol, Internet, Internet based therapy, Cognitive behavioral therapy

Brief summary

Objectives: This study will evaluate the efficacy of internet-based relapse prevention with therapist support, as compared to face-to-face therapy at an employee assistance program. The design is a two-armed randomized controlled design, and outcomes are measured in terms of changes in problematic alcohol use, as well as depression and quality of life. Method: Participants with problematic alcohol use who, after an initial evaluation consisting of five face-to-face sessions with a licensed psychologist where alcohol and collateral problems are extensively assessed, are recommended treatment for problematic alcohol use. Consenting participants will be randomized into one of two groups: 1. Internet delivered relapse prevention with therapist support or 2. Face-to-face therapy. Outcomes on alcohol use, depression and quality of life as well as information on user satisfaction will be gathered post treatment. Follow up will be at 3, 6 and 12 months after completion. Our hypothesis is that the internet-based program with therapist support and the face-to-face therapy will be equally effective in reducing alcohol use (non-inferiority).

Interventions

BEHAVIORALeChange

A web-based relapse intervention program consisting of 14 modules. The patient will have access to therapist support through a secure messaging system

Face-to-face psychotherapy, consisting of 20 sessions. The content will be different for different therapists, but all have an evidence based approach to therapy

Sponsors

Karolinska Institutet
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Problematic alcohol use and having been recommended psychotherapy by the assessing psychologist.

Exclusion criteria

Inadequate Swedish language skills No Internet access Reading and/or writing difficulties Major depression Current suicidal thoughts and/or plans Primary problematic drug use PTSD-related problems Psychosis Cognitive disability

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Alcohol Use Identification Test (AUDIT)Post, 3, 6 and 12 monthsChange in total AUDIT score, as a summarized measure of alcohol use (including alcohol consumption and alcohol-related problems)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time Line Follow Back (TLFB)Post, 3, 6 and 12 monthsChange in total TLFB score, as a summarized measure of alcohol consumption
Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale - Self report (MADRS-S)Post, 3, 6 and 12 monthsChange in total MADRS-S score, as a summarized measure of depression
World Health Quality of Life Scale (WHOQOL-BREF)Post, 3, 6 and 12 monthsChange in total WHOQOL-BREF score, as a summarized measure of quality of life

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Biological tests for alcohol markersPostBiological marker outcomes post-treatment. B-PEth and CDT.
Drug Use Identification Test (DUDIT)Post, 3, 6 and 12 monthsChange in total DUDIT score, as a summarized measure of drug (including alcohol consumption and alcohol-related problems)

Countries

Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026