Skip to content

The TRansendocardial Stem Cell Injection Delivery Effects on Neomyogenesis STudy (The TRIDENT Study)

A Phase II, Randomized, Blinded, Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Transendocardial Injection of Allogeneic Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells (hMSCs) (20 Million or 100 Million Total MSCs) in Patients With Chronic Ischemic Left Ventricular Dysfunction Secondary to Myocardial Infarction.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02013674
Acronym
Trident
Enrollment
30
Registered
2013-12-17
Start date
2014-02-13
Completion date
2017-09-18
Last updated
2020-02-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Ischemic Left Ventricular Dysfunction, Myocardial Infarction

Keywords

Cardiovascular, Chronic Ischemic Left Ventricular Dysfunction

Brief summary

Thirty (30) patients with chronic ischemic left ventricular dysfunction secondary to MI scheduled to undergo cardiac catheterization will be enrolled in the study. This is a phase II study intended to gain additional safety and efficacy assessments among two dose levels previously studied in a phase I setting.

Detailed description

Thirty (30) patients with chronic ischemic left ventricular dysfunction secondary to MI scheduled to undergo cardiac catheterization will be enrolled in the study.This is a phase II study intended to gain additional safety and efficacy assessments among two dose levels previously studied in a phase I setting. In this study, a 20 million total hMSC dose and a 100 million total hMSC dose will be randomly allocated administered via the Biocardia Helical infusion system in a blinded manner. The technique of transplanting progenitor cells into a region of damaged myocardium, termed cellular cardiomyoplasty, is a potentially new therapeutic modality designed to replace or repair necrotic, scarred, or dysfunctional myocardium. Ideally, graft cells should be readily available, easy to culture to ensure adequate quantities for transplantation, and able to survive in host myocardium, which is often a hostile environment of limited blood supply and immunorejection. Whether effective cellular regenerative strategies require that administered cells differentiate into adult cardiomyocytes and couple electromechanically with the surrounding myocardium is increasingly controversial and recent evidence suggests that this may not be required for effective cardiac repair. Most importantly, transplantation of graft cells should improve cardiac function and prevent adverse ventricular remodeling. To date, a number of candidate cells have been transplanted in experimental models, including fetal and neonatal cardiomyocytes, embryonic stem cell-derived myocytes, tissue engineered contractile grafts9, skeletal myoblasts, several cell types derived from adult bone marrow, and cardiac precursors residing within the heart itself. There has been substantial clinical development in the use of whole bone marrow and skeletal myoblast preparations in studies enrolling both post-infarction patients and patients with chronic ischemic left ventricular dysfunction and heart failure. The effects of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have also been studied clinically. Currently, bone marrow or bone marrow-derived cells represent a highly promising modality for cardiac repair. The totality of evidence from trials investigating autologous whole bone marrow infusions into patients following myocardial infarction supports the safety of this approach. In terms of efficacy, increases in ejection fraction are reported in the majority of the trials. Chronic ischemic left ventricular dysfunction is a common and problematic condition; definitive therapy in the form of heart transplantation is available to only a tiny minority of eligible patients. Cellular cardiomyoplasty for chronic heart failure has been studied less than for acute MI, but represents a potentially important alternative for this disease.

Interventions

Allogeneic Adult Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) delivered via injection

Sponsors

The Emmes Company, LLC
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Joshua M Hare
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* In order to participate in this study, a patient MUST: 1. Be ≥ 21 and \< 90 years of age. 2. Provide written informed consent. 3. Have a diagnosis of chronic ischemic left ventricular dysfunction secondary to myocardial infarction (MI) as defined by previous myocardial infarction documented by an imaging study demonstrating coronary artery disease with corresponding areas of akinesis, dyskinesis, or severe hypokinesis. 4. Been treated with appropriate maximal medical therapy for heart failure or post-infarction left ventricular dysfunction. For beta-blockade, the patient must have been on a stable dose of a clinically appropriate beta-blocker for 3 months. For angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition, the patient must have been on a stable dose of a clinically appropriate agent for 1 month. 5. Be a candidate for cardiac catheterization within 5 to 10 weeks of screening as determined by doctors. 6. Have an ejection fraction of less than or equal to 50% by gated blood pool scan, two-dimensional echocardiogram, CT, or left ventriculogram within the prior six months and not in the setting of a recent ischemic event.

Exclusion criteria

* In order to participate in this study, a patient MUST NOT: 1. Have a baseline glomerular filtration rate ≤ 35 ml/min/1.73m2. 2. Have a known, serious radiographic contrast allergy. 3. Have a Mechanical aortic valve or heart constrictive device. 4. Have a documented presence of aortic stenosis (aortic stenosis graded as 1.5cm2 or less). 5. Have a documented presence of moderate to severe aortic insufficiency (echocardiographic assessment of aortic insufficiency graded as ≥+2). 6. Require coronary artery revascularization. Patients who require or undergo revascularization procedures should undergo these procedures a minimum of 3 months in advance of treatment in this study. In addition, patients who develop a need for revascularization following enrollment will be submitted for this therapy without delay. 7. Have evidence of a life-threatening arrhythmia in the absence of a defibrillator (non-sustained ventricular tachycardia ≥ 20 consecutive beats or complete second or third degree heart block in the absence of a functioning pacemaker) or Corrected for heart rate (QTc) interval \> 550 ms on screening ECG 8. Automatic Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (AICD) firing in the past 60 days prior to enrollment. 9. Have a hematologic abnormality as evidenced by hematocrit \< 25%, white blood cell \< 2,500/µl or platelet values \< 100,000/µl without another explanation. 10. Have liver dysfunction, as evidenced by enzymes (AST and ALT) greater than three times the upper limit of normal (ULN). 11. Have a coagulopathy = (INR \> 1.3) not due to a reversible cause (i.e., Coumadin). Patients on Coumadin will be withdrawn 5 days before the procedure and confirmed to have an INR \< 1.3. Patients who cannot be withdrawn from Coumadin will be excluded from enrollment 12. Have known allergies to penicillin or streptomycin. 13. Hypersensitivity to Dimethyl Sulfoxide (DMSO). 14. Be an organ transplant recipient. 15. Have a history of organ or cell transplant rejection 16. Have a clinical history of malignancy within 5 years (i.e., patients with prior malignancy must be disease free for 5 years), except curatively-treated basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, melanoma in situ or cervical carcinoma. 17. Have a non-cardiac condition that limits lifespan to \< 1 year. 18. Have a history of drug or alcohol abuse within the past 24 months. 19. Be on chronic therapy with immunosuppressant medication, such as corticosteroids or TNFα antagonists. 20. Be serum positive for HIV, hepatitis BsAg or viremic hepatitis C. 21. Be currently participating (or participated within the previous 30 days) in an investigational therapeutic or device trial. 22. Be a female who is pregnant, nursing, or of childbearing potential while not practicing effective contraceptive methods. Female patients must undergo a blood or urine pregnancy test at screening and within 36 hours prior to injection.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAE).One month post-catheterizationIncidence (at one month post-catheterization) of any treatment-emergent serious adverse events, defined as the composite of: death, non-fatal MI, stroke, hospitalization for worsening heart failure, cardiac perforation, pericardial tamponade, sustained ventricular arrhythmias (characterized by ventricular arrhythmias lasting longer than 15 seconds or with hemodynamic compromise).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participant With Reported Tissue Perfusion6 months, 12 monthsTissue perfusion measured by CT.
Peak Oxygen Consumption (VO2)Baseline, 6 months, 12 monthsPeak VO2 assessed via treadmill determination.
Six-minute Walk Test.Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 monthsA test that measures how far a patient can walk in 6 minutes.
Changed in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification Based on Patient's Self Reported Activity Level.Baseline to 3 months, Baseline to 6 months, Baseline to 12 monthsChanged in NYHA Functional Classification will be evaluated. Worsened: Documented increase in limitation in physical activity. Improved: Documented decrease in limitation in physical activity. Unchanged: No documented change in limitation in physical activity.
Number of Incidents of Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE).1 month, 6 months, 12 months post injection.Incidence of the Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) endpoint, defined as the composite incidence of (1) death, (2) hospitalization for worsening heart failure, or (3) non-fatal recurrent MI.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (AE)6 months, 12 monthsIncidence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Event defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject temporally associated with the use of the study product.
Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLHF) Questionnaire ScoresBaseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 monthsMinnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLHF) Questionnaire has a total score from 0 to 105. A higher score indicates that participant's heart failure is preventing them from living their life.
Echocardiographic-derived Measures of Left Ventricular Function6 months, 12 monthsLeft ventricular end diastolic wall thickness as determined by echocardiogram.
Difference Between Regional Left Ventricular Function (at the Site of Allogeneic Cell Injections)Baseline, 12 MonthsAs determined by Computed Tomography Scan
Difference Between the Regional Left Ventricular Wall ThickeningBaseline, Month 12As determined by Computed Tomography Scan
Infarct Scar Size (ISS)Baseline, 12 monthsDetermined by delayed contrast enhanced Computed Tomography (CT) Scan
Difference Between the Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)Baseline, 12 monthsChange in 1-year LVEF by CT as compared to baseline.
Difference in LVEFBaseline, 6 months, 12 monthsAs assessed via ECHO
Difference in Left Ventricular VolumeBaseline, 6 months, 12 monthsDifference in left ventricular end diastolic and end systolic volume will be assessed via ECHO
Difference in Left Ventricular Regional Myocardial PerfusionBaseline, 12 monthsAs measured via myocardial mass by CT
Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Reads.12 monthsThe number of participants with abnormal ECG readings via 24 hour ambulatory ECG recordings as assessed per treating physician discretion.
Number of Clinically Significant of Abnormal Lab Values.12 monthsClinical significance of abnormal lab values will be assessed by treating physician
Serial Troponin I12 hours, 24 hours post cardiac catheterizationSerial Troponin I values in ng/mL over time.
Number of Participants With Abnormal ECHO Reading6 hours post cardiac catheterizationThe number of participants with abnormal reading post-cardiac catheterization. As assessed per treating physician discretion.
Creatinine Kinase Muscle/Brain (CK-MB)12 hours, 24 hours post cardiac catheterizationCK-MB values in ng/mL over time.
Difference Between Left Ventricular End Diastolic Wall ThicknessBaseline, 12 MonthsAs determined by Computed Tomography Scan

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group 1: 20 Million Allogeneic hMSCs
Fifteen (15) patients to be treated with Allo-hMSCs: 4 million cells/ml delivered in a dose of 0.5 ml per injection x 10 injections for a total of 0.2x 10\^8 (20 million) Allo-hMSCs. Allogeneic hMSCs: Allogeneic Adult Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) delivered via injection
15
Group 2: 100 Million Allogeneic hMSCs
Fifteen (15) patients to be treated with Allo-hMSCs: 20 million cells/ml delivered in a dose of 0.5 ml per injection x 10 injections for a total of 1x 10\^8 (100 million) Allo-hMSCs. Allogeneic hMSCs: Allogeneic Adult Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) delivered via injection
15
Total30

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath01
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGroup 2: 100 Million Allogeneic hMSCsGroup 1: 20 Million Allogeneic hMSCsTotal
Age, Continuous65.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4
66.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2
66.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7
Enrollment Ejection Fraction (%)26.7 percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5
31.5 percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9
29.1 percentage
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6
Enrollment Glomerular Filtration Rate (mL/Min)79.2 mL/min
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.4
70.0 mL/min
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.4
74.6 mL/min
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.6
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
12 Participants13 Participants25 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
14 Participants14 Participants28 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants12 Participants27 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 151 / 15
other
Total, other adverse events
8 / 1510 / 15
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 152 / 15

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAE).

Incidence (at one month post-catheterization) of any treatment-emergent serious adverse events, defined as the composite of: death, non-fatal MI, stroke, hospitalization for worsening heart failure, cardiac perforation, pericardial tamponade, sustained ventricular arrhythmias (characterized by ventricular arrhythmias lasting longer than 15 seconds or with hemodynamic compromise).

Time frame: One month post-catheterization

Population: SAEs are collected for 12 months, however, outcome 1 is only for SAEs during the first month.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group 1: 20 Million Allogeneic hMSCsNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAE).0 Participants
Group 2: 100 Million Allogeneic hMSCsNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAE).0 Participants
Secondary

Changed in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification Based on Patient's Self Reported Activity Level.

Changed in NYHA Functional Classification will be evaluated. Worsened: Documented increase in limitation in physical activity. Improved: Documented decrease in limitation in physical activity. Unchanged: No documented change in limitation in physical activity.

Time frame: Baseline to 3 months, Baseline to 6 months, Baseline to 12 months

Population: Not all participants were able to complete procedure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group 1: 20 Million Allogeneic hMSCsChanged in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification Based on Patient's Self Reported Activity Level.Baseline to 3 months, Unchanged10 Participants
Group 1: 20 Million Allogeneic hMSCsChanged in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification Based on Patient's Self Reported Activity Level.Baseline to 6 months, Worsened2 Participants
Group 1: 20 Million Allogeneic hMSCsChanged in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification Based on Patient's Self Reported Activity Level.Baseline to 6 months, Improved5 Participants
Group 1: 20 Million Allogeneic hMSCsChanged in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification Based on Patient's Self Reported Activity Level.Baseline to 12 months, Improved5 Participants
Group 1: 20 Million Allogeneic hMSCsChanged in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification Based on Patient's Self Reported Activity Level.Baseline to 3 months, Worsened3 Participants
Group 1: 20 Million Allogeneic hMSCsChanged in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification Based on Patient's Self Reported Activity Level.Baseline to 12 months, Unchanged8 Participants
Group 1: 20 Million Allogeneic hMSCsChanged in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification Based on Patient's Self Reported Activity Level.Baseline to 6 months, Unchanged7 Participants
Group 1: 20 Million Allogeneic hMSCsChanged in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification Based on Patient's Self Reported Activity Level.Baseline to 12 months, Worsened1 Participants
Group 1: 20 Million Allogeneic hMSCsChanged in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification Based on Patient's Self Reported Activity Level.Baseline to 3 months, Improved2 Participants
Group 2: 100 Million Allogeneic hMSCsChanged in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification Based on Patient's Self Reported Activity Level.Baseline to 12 months, Worsened4 Participants
Group 2: 100 Million Allogeneic hMSCsChanged in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification Based on Patient's Self Reported Activity Level.Baseline to 3 months, Improved4 Participants
Group 2: 100 Million Allogeneic hMSCsChanged in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification Based on Patient's Self Reported Activity Level.Baseline to 3 months, Unchanged9 Participants
Group 2: 100 Million Allogeneic hMSCsChanged in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification Based on Patient's Self Reported Activity Level.Baseline to 3 months, Worsened2 Participants
Group 2: 100 Million Allogeneic hMSCsChanged in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification Based on Patient's Self Reported Activity Level.Baseline to 6 months, Improved4 Participants
Group 2: 100 Million Allogeneic hMSCsChanged in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification Based on Patient's Self Reported Activity Level.Baseline to 6 months, Unchanged8 Participants
Group 2: 100 Million Allogeneic hMSCsChanged in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification Based on Patient's Self Reported Activity Level.Baseline to 6 months, Worsened2 Participants
Group 2: 100 Million Allogeneic hMSCsChanged in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification Based on Patient's Self Reported Activity Level.Baseline to 12 months, Improved6 Participants
Group 2: 100 Million Allogeneic hMSCsChanged in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification Based on Patient's Self Reported Activity Level.Baseline to 12 months, Unchanged4 Participants
Secondary

Creatinine Kinase Muscle/Brain (CK-MB)

CK-MB values in ng/mL over time.

Time frame: 12 hours, 24 hours post cardiac catheterization

Population: Not all participants were able to complete the procedure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Group 1: 20 Million Allogeneic hMSCsCreatinine Kinase Muscle/Brain (CK-MB)12 hour post catheterization3.25 ng/ml
Group 1: 20 Million Allogeneic hMSCsCreatinine Kinase Muscle/Brain (CK-MB)24 hour post catheterization4.20 ng/ml
Group 2: 100 Million Allogeneic hMSCsCreatinine Kinase Muscle/Brain (CK-MB)12 hour post catheterization2.45 ng/ml
Group 2: 100 Million Allogeneic hMSCsCreatinine Kinase Muscle/Brain (CK-MB)24 hour post catheterization4.40 ng/ml
Secondary

Difference Between Left Ventricular End Diastolic Wall Thickness

As determined by Computed Tomography Scan

Time frame: Baseline, 12 Months

Population: Data were not available to perform the statistical analyses as described in the protocol for this outcome.

Secondary

Difference Between Regional Left Ventricular Function (at the Site of Allogeneic Cell Injections)

As determined by Computed Tomography Scan

Time frame: Baseline, 12 Months

Population: Data were not available to perform the statistical analyses as described in the protocol for this outcome.

Secondary

Difference Between the Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)

Change in 1-year LVEF by CT as compared to baseline.

Time frame: Baseline, 12 months

Population: Not all participants were able to complete the procedure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Group 1: 20 Million Allogeneic hMSCsDifference Between the Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)-0.27 Percentage of ejected blood
Group 2: 100 Million Allogeneic hMSCsDifference Between the Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)3.00 Percentage of ejected blood
Secondary

Difference Between the Regional Left Ventricular Wall Thickening

As determined by Computed Tomography Scan

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12

Population: Data were not available to perform the statistical analyses as described in the protocol for this outcome.

Secondary

Difference in Left Ventricular Regional Myocardial Perfusion

As measured via myocardial mass by CT

Time frame: Baseline, 12 months

Population: Data were not available to perform the statistical analyses as described in the protocol for this outcome.

Secondary

Difference in Left Ventricular Volume

Difference in left ventricular end diastolic and end systolic volume will be assessed via ECHO

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months

Population: Data were not available to perform the statistical analyses as described in the protocol for this outcome.

Secondary

Difference in Left Ventricular Volume

Difference in left ventricular end diastolic and end systolic volume will be assessed via CT

Time frame: Baseline, 12 months

Population: Not all participants were able to complete the procedure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Group 1: 20 Million Allogeneic hMSCsDifference in Left Ventricular Volume7.65 ml
Group 2: 100 Million Allogeneic hMSCsDifference in Left Ventricular Volume3.70 ml
Secondary

Difference in LVEF

As assessed via ECHO

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months

Population: Data were not available to perform the statistical analyses as described in the protocol for this outcome.

Secondary

Echocardiographic-derived Measures of Left Ventricular Function

Left ventricular end diastolic wall thickness as determined by echocardiogram.

Time frame: 6 months, 12 months

Population: Not all participants were able to complete the procedure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Group 1: 20 Million Allogeneic hMSCsEchocardiographic-derived Measures of Left Ventricular FunctionMonth 65.8 centimeters (cm)
Group 1: 20 Million Allogeneic hMSCsEchocardiographic-derived Measures of Left Ventricular FunctionMonth 126.1 centimeters (cm)
Group 2: 100 Million Allogeneic hMSCsEchocardiographic-derived Measures of Left Ventricular FunctionMonth 66.3 centimeters (cm)
Group 2: 100 Million Allogeneic hMSCsEchocardiographic-derived Measures of Left Ventricular FunctionMonth 126.2 centimeters (cm)
Secondary

Infarct Scar Size (ISS)

Determined by delayed contrast enhanced Computed Tomography (CT) Scan

Time frame: Baseline, 12 months

Population: Not all participants were able to complete procedure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Group 1: 20 Million Allogeneic hMSCsInfarct Scar Size (ISS)Baseline9.9 Percent of Left Ventricular Mass
Group 1: 20 Million Allogeneic hMSCsInfarct Scar Size (ISS)12 Months6.8 Percent of Left Ventricular Mass
Group 2: 100 Million Allogeneic hMSCsInfarct Scar Size (ISS)12 Months5.6 Percent of Left Ventricular Mass
Group 2: 100 Million Allogeneic hMSCsInfarct Scar Size (ISS)Baseline9.7 Percent of Left Ventricular Mass
Secondary

Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLHF) Questionnaire Scores

Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLHF) Questionnaire has a total score from 0 to 105. A higher score indicates that participant's heart failure is preventing them from living their life.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months

Population: Not all participants were able to complete procedure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Group 1: 20 Million Allogeneic hMSCsMinnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLHF) Questionnaire ScoresBaseline29.0 score on a scale
Group 1: 20 Million Allogeneic hMSCsMinnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLHF) Questionnaire Scores3 months22.0 score on a scale
Group 1: 20 Million Allogeneic hMSCsMinnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLHF) Questionnaire Scores6 months30.0 score on a scale
Group 1: 20 Million Allogeneic hMSCsMinnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLHF) Questionnaire Scores12 months25.0 score on a scale
Group 2: 100 Million Allogeneic hMSCsMinnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLHF) Questionnaire Scores12 months15.0 score on a scale
Group 2: 100 Million Allogeneic hMSCsMinnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLHF) Questionnaire ScoresBaseline35.0 score on a scale
Group 2: 100 Million Allogeneic hMSCsMinnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLHF) Questionnaire Scores6 months21.5 score on a scale
Group 2: 100 Million Allogeneic hMSCsMinnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLHF) Questionnaire Scores3 months20.0 score on a scale
Secondary

Number of Clinically Significant of Abnormal Lab Values.

Clinical significance of abnormal lab values will be assessed by treating physician

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Data were not available to perform the statistical analyses as described in the protocol for this outcome.

Secondary

Number of Incidents of Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE).

Incidence of the Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) endpoint, defined as the composite incidence of (1) death, (2) hospitalization for worsening heart failure, or (3) non-fatal recurrent MI.

Time frame: 1 month, 6 months, 12 months post injection.

Population: Not all participants were able to complete study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Group 1: 20 Million Allogeneic hMSCsNumber of Incidents of Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE).1 month from injection0 Incidents
Group 1: 20 Million Allogeneic hMSCsNumber of Incidents of Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE).6 months from injection3 Incidents
Group 1: 20 Million Allogeneic hMSCsNumber of Incidents of Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE).12 months from injection3 Incidents
Group 2: 100 Million Allogeneic hMSCsNumber of Incidents of Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE).1 month from injection0 Incidents
Group 2: 100 Million Allogeneic hMSCsNumber of Incidents of Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE).6 months from injection2 Incidents
Group 2: 100 Million Allogeneic hMSCsNumber of Incidents of Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE).12 months from injection2 Incidents
Secondary

Number of Participants With Abnormal ECHO Reading

The number of participants with abnormal reading post-cardiac catheterization. As assessed per treating physician discretion.

Time frame: 6 hours post cardiac catheterization

Population: Not all participants were able to complete the procedure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group 1: 20 Million Allogeneic hMSCsNumber of Participants With Abnormal ECHO ReadingNormal1 Participants
Group 1: 20 Million Allogeneic hMSCsNumber of Participants With Abnormal ECHO ReadingAbnormal, Not Clinically Significant6 Participants
Group 1: 20 Million Allogeneic hMSCsNumber of Participants With Abnormal ECHO ReadingAbnormal, Clinically Significant0 Participants
Group 2: 100 Million Allogeneic hMSCsNumber of Participants With Abnormal ECHO ReadingNormal2 Participants
Group 2: 100 Million Allogeneic hMSCsNumber of Participants With Abnormal ECHO ReadingAbnormal, Not Clinically Significant6 Participants
Group 2: 100 Million Allogeneic hMSCsNumber of Participants With Abnormal ECHO ReadingAbnormal, Clinically Significant0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Reads.

The number of participants with abnormal ECG readings via 24 hour ambulatory ECG recordings as assessed per treating physician discretion.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Not all participants were able to complete the procedure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group 1: 20 Million Allogeneic hMSCsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Reads.baseline, normal0 Participants
Group 1: 20 Million Allogeneic hMSCsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Reads.baseline, abnormal not clinically significant15 Participants
Group 1: 20 Million Allogeneic hMSCsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Reads.baseline, abnormal, clinically significant0 Participants
Group 1: 20 Million Allogeneic hMSCsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Reads.12 months, normal0 Participants
Group 1: 20 Million Allogeneic hMSCsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Reads.12 months, abnormal not clinically significant12 Participants
Group 1: 20 Million Allogeneic hMSCsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Reads.12 months, abnormal, clinically significant0 Participants
Group 2: 100 Million Allogeneic hMSCsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Reads.12 months, abnormal not clinically significant14 Participants
Group 2: 100 Million Allogeneic hMSCsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Reads.baseline, normal1 Participants
Group 2: 100 Million Allogeneic hMSCsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Reads.12 months, normal0 Participants
Group 2: 100 Million Allogeneic hMSCsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Reads.baseline, abnormal not clinically significant14 Participants
Group 2: 100 Million Allogeneic hMSCsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Reads.12 months, abnormal, clinically significant0 Participants
Group 2: 100 Million Allogeneic hMSCsNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Reads.baseline, abnormal, clinically significant0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (AE)

Incidence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Event defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject temporally associated with the use of the study product.

Time frame: 6 months, 12 months

Population: Not all participants were able to complete the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group 1: 20 Million Allogeneic hMSCsNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (AE)Treatment emergent AE (6 month)8 Participants
Group 1: 20 Million Allogeneic hMSCsNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (AE)Treatment emergent AE (12 months)10 Participants
Group 2: 100 Million Allogeneic hMSCsNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (AE)Treatment emergent AE (6 month)10 Participants
Group 2: 100 Million Allogeneic hMSCsNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (AE)Treatment emergent AE (12 months)13 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participant With Reported Tissue Perfusion

Tissue perfusion measured by CT.

Time frame: 6 months, 12 months

Population: Not all participants were able to complete procedure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group 1: 20 Million Allogeneic hMSCsNumber of Participant With Reported Tissue Perfusionat 6 months0 Participants
Group 1: 20 Million Allogeneic hMSCsNumber of Participant With Reported Tissue Perfusionat 12 months0 Participants
Group 2: 100 Million Allogeneic hMSCsNumber of Participant With Reported Tissue Perfusionat 6 months0 Participants
Group 2: 100 Million Allogeneic hMSCsNumber of Participant With Reported Tissue Perfusionat 12 months0 Participants
Secondary

Peak Oxygen Consumption (VO2)

Peak VO2 assessed via treadmill determination.

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months

Population: Not all participants were able to complete procedure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group 1: 20 Million Allogeneic hMSCsPeak Oxygen Consumption (VO2)Baseline15.8 mL/kg/minStandard Deviation 5.15
Group 1: 20 Million Allogeneic hMSCsPeak Oxygen Consumption (VO2)6 months15.0 mL/kg/minStandard Deviation 5.27
Group 1: 20 Million Allogeneic hMSCsPeak Oxygen Consumption (VO2)12 months14.4 mL/kg/minStandard Deviation 4.94
Group 2: 100 Million Allogeneic hMSCsPeak Oxygen Consumption (VO2)Baseline16.7 mL/kg/minStandard Deviation 4.48
Group 2: 100 Million Allogeneic hMSCsPeak Oxygen Consumption (VO2)6 months16.5 mL/kg/minStandard Deviation 5.3
Group 2: 100 Million Allogeneic hMSCsPeak Oxygen Consumption (VO2)12 months16.3 mL/kg/minStandard Deviation 5.84
Secondary

Serial Troponin I

Serial Troponin I values in ng/mL over time.

Time frame: 12 hours, 24 hours post cardiac catheterization

Population: Not all participants were able to complete the procedure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Group 1: 20 Million Allogeneic hMSCsSerial Troponin I12-hours post-catheterization0.01 ng/ml
Group 1: 20 Million Allogeneic hMSCsSerial Troponin I24-hours post-catheterization0.06 ng/ml
Group 2: 100 Million Allogeneic hMSCsSerial Troponin I24-hours post-catheterization0.05 ng/ml
Group 2: 100 Million Allogeneic hMSCsSerial Troponin I12-hours post-catheterization0.01 ng/ml
Secondary

Six-minute Walk Test.

A test that measures how far a patient can walk in 6 minutes.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months

Population: Not all participants were able to complete procedure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group 1: 20 Million Allogeneic hMSCsSix-minute Walk Test.Baseline398.7 MetersStandard Deviation 111.62
Group 1: 20 Million Allogeneic hMSCsSix-minute Walk Test.3 months396.1 MetersStandard Deviation 109.62
Group 1: 20 Million Allogeneic hMSCsSix-minute Walk Test.6 months416.4 MetersStandard Deviation 107.76
Group 1: 20 Million Allogeneic hMSCsSix-minute Walk Test.12 months409.7 MetersStandard Deviation 130.19
Group 2: 100 Million Allogeneic hMSCsSix-minute Walk Test.12 months463.0 MetersStandard Deviation 143.07
Group 2: 100 Million Allogeneic hMSCsSix-minute Walk Test.Baseline434.9 MetersStandard Deviation 120.04
Group 2: 100 Million Allogeneic hMSCsSix-minute Walk Test.6 months453.6 MetersStandard Deviation 126.82
Group 2: 100 Million Allogeneic hMSCsSix-minute Walk Test.3 months433.5 MetersStandard Deviation 133.97

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 26, 2026