Skip to content

Intravaginal Prasterone (DHEA) Against Vulvovaginal Atrophy Associated With Menopause

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02013544
Enrollment
558
Registered
2013-12-17
Start date
2014-02-28
Completion date
2015-02-28
Last updated
2017-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Vaginal Atrophy

Keywords

Vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA), Vaginal atrophy, Atrophic vaginitis, prasterone, DHEA, Intrarosa

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to confirm the efficacy of intravaginal prasterone (DHEA) on symptoms of vulvovaginal atrophy due to menopause and to collect further data on subjects exposed to intravaginal DHEA in order to meet the ICH E1 guideline requirements.

Interventions

DRUGPlacebo

Sponsors

EndoCeutics Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
40 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Main criteria: * Postmenopausal women (hysterectomized or not) * Women between 40 and 80 years of age * Women having ≤5% of superficial cells on vaginal smear at baseline * Women having a vaginal pH above 5 at baseline * Women who have self-identified moderate or severe symptom(s) of vaginal atrophy * Willing to participate in the study and sign an informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Main criteria: * Previous enrollment in EndoCeutics studies performed with intravaginal DHEA * Previous diagnosis of cancer, except skin cancer (non melanoma) * Clinically significant metabolic or endocrine disease (including diabetes mellitus) not controlled by medication * The administration of any investigational drug within 30 days of screening visit * Clinically significant abnormal serum biochemistry, urinalysis or hematology

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearBaseline and Week 12The percentage of superficial cells was determined from the vaginal smears collected during the study. A 100-cell count was performed by a central laboratory to classify cells as parabasal (P) (including basal), intermediate (I), and superficial (S) squamous cell types. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearBaseline and Week 12The percentage of parabasal cells was determined from the vaginal smears collected during the study. A 100-cell count was performed by a central laboratory to classify cells as parabasal (P) (including basal), intermediate (I), and superficial (S) squamous cell types. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Vaginal pHBaseline and Week 12A pH strip fixed on an Ayre spatula (or equivalent) was applied directly to the lateral wall of the vagina. The change in color of the pH indicator strip was compared to the color chart for pH evaluation. The corresponding pH value (with one decimal) was recorded. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of the Most Bothersome Symptom of DyspareuniaBaseline and Week 12The severity of dyspareunia was evaluated by a questionnaire filled out by women. The severity of dyspareunia recorded as none, mild, moderate or severe was analyzed using the score values of 0, 1, 2 or 3, respectively. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal DrynessBaseline and Week 12The severity of vaginal dryness was evaluated by a questionnaire filled out by women. The severity of vaginal dryness recorded as none, mild, moderate or severe was analyzed using the score values of 0, 1, 2 or 3, respectively. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal ColorBaseline and Week 12To evaluate the aspect of the mucosa and the local tolerance to prasterone ovules, the vaginal color (one of the four main signs of vaginal atrophy) evaluated by the physician/gynecologist as corresponding to none, mild, moderate, or severe atrophy was analyzed using the score values of 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal SecretionsBaseline and Week 12To evaluate the aspect of the mucosa and the local tolerance to prasterone ovules, the vaginal secretions (one of the four main signs of vaginal atrophy) evaluated by the physician/gynecologist as corresponding to none, mild, moderate, or severe atrophy were analyzed using the score values of 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial IntegrityBaseline and Week 12To evaluate the aspect of the mucosa and the local tolerance to prasterone ovules, the vaginal epithelial integrity (one of the four main signs of vaginal atrophy) evaluated by the physician/gynecologist as corresponding to none, mild, moderate, or severe atrophy was analyzed using the score values of 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial Surface ThicknessBaseline and Week 12To evaluate the aspect of the mucosa and the local tolerance to prasterone ovules, the vaginal epithelial surface thickness (one of the four main signs of vaginal atrophy) evaluated by the physician/gynecologist as corresponding to none, mild, moderate, or severe atrophy was analyzed using the score values of 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 1226 subjects were screened at 38 medical/research sites located in the US (24 centers) and Canada (14 centers) and 558 subjects were randomized. The first subject first visit was on 11-FEB-2014 and the last subject last visit was on 06-JAN-2015.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Placebo: Placebo vaginal ovule; daily dosing with one ovule for 12 weeks.
180
0.50% Prasterone (DHEA)
Prasterone (DHEA): Vaginal ovule containing 0.50% (6.5 mg) prasterone; daily dosing with one ovule for 12 weeks.
374
Total554

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event55
Overall StudyEntry criteria not met/non-compliance23
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up23
Overall StudyPhysician Decision01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject28

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo0.50% Prasterone (DHEA)Total
Age, Continuous59.55 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.75
59.51 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.78
59.53 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.46
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
2 Participants4 Participants6 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
13 Participants28 Participants41 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White Caucasian
163 Participants338 Participants501 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
180 Participants374 Participants554 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
10 / 18024 / 374
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1805 / 374

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear

The percentage of parabasal cells was determined from the vaginal smears collected during the study. A 100-cell count was performed by a central laboratory to classify cells as parabasal (P) (including basal), intermediate (I), and superficial (S) squamous cell types. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Efficacy analyses were performed primarily on the Intent to Treat (ITT) population defined as all subjects who have received at least one dose of study drug with a baseline (Day 1) evaluation meeting the study entry criteria.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearBaseline51.66 Percentage of parabasal cellsStandard Error 3
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearWeek 1239.68 Percentage of parabasal cellsStandard Error 2.68
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearChange from Baseline to Week 12-11.98 Percentage of parabasal cellsStandard Error 2.36
0.50% Prasterone (DHEA)Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearBaseline54.25 Percentage of parabasal cellsStandard Error 2.14
0.50% Prasterone (DHEA)Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearWeek 1212.74 Percentage of parabasal cellsStandard Error 1.02
0.50% Prasterone (DHEA)Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearChange from Baseline to Week 12-41.51 Percentage of parabasal cellsStandard Error 2.01
Primary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear

The percentage of superficial cells was determined from the vaginal smears collected during the study. A 100-cell count was performed by a central laboratory to classify cells as parabasal (P) (including basal), intermediate (I), and superficial (S) squamous cell types. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Efficacy analyses were performed primarily on the Intent to Treat (ITT) population defined as all subjects who have received at least one dose of study drug with a baseline (Day 1) evaluation meeting the study entry criteria.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearBaseline1.04 Percentage of superficial cellsStandard Error 0.11
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearWeek 122.78 Percentage of superficial cellsStandard Error 0.27
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearChange from Baseline to Week 121.75 Percentage of superficial cellsStandard Error 0.27
0.50% Prasterone (DHEA)Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearBaseline1.02 Percentage of superficial cellsStandard Error 0.08
0.50% Prasterone (DHEA)Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearWeek 1211.22 Percentage of superficial cellsStandard Error 0.56
0.50% Prasterone (DHEA)Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal SmearChange from Baseline to Week 1210.20 Percentage of superficial cellsStandard Error 0.57
Primary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of the Most Bothersome Symptom of Dyspareunia

The severity of dyspareunia was evaluated by a questionnaire filled out by women. The severity of dyspareunia recorded as none, mild, moderate or severe was analyzed using the score values of 0, 1, 2 or 3, respectively. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Efficacy analyses were performed primarily on the Intent to Treat (ITT) population defined as all subjects who have received at least one dose of study drug with a baseline (Day 1) evaluation meeting the study entry criteria.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of the Most Bothersome Symptom of DyspareuniaBaseline2.56 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of the Most Bothersome Symptom of DyspareuniaWeek 121.50 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of the Most Bothersome Symptom of DyspareuniaChange from Baseline to Week 12-1.06 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
0.50% Prasterone (DHEA)Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of the Most Bothersome Symptom of DyspareuniaBaseline2.54 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
0.50% Prasterone (DHEA)Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of the Most Bothersome Symptom of DyspareuniaWeek 121.13 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
0.50% Prasterone (DHEA)Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of the Most Bothersome Symptom of DyspareuniaChange from Baseline to Week 12-1.42 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
Primary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Vaginal pH

A pH strip fixed on an Ayre spatula (or equivalent) was applied directly to the lateral wall of the vagina. The change in color of the pH indicator strip was compared to the color chart for pH evaluation. The corresponding pH value (with one decimal) was recorded. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Efficacy analyses were performed primarily on the Intent to Treat (ITT) population defined as all subjects who have received at least one dose of study drug with a baseline (Day 1) evaluation meeting the study entry criteria.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Vaginal pHBaseline6.32 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Vaginal pHWeek 126.05 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Vaginal pHChange from Baseline to Week 12-0.27 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
0.50% Prasterone (DHEA)Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Vaginal pHBaseline6.34 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
0.50% Prasterone (DHEA)Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Vaginal pHWeek 125.39 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
0.50% Prasterone (DHEA)Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Vaginal pHChange from Baseline to Week 12-0.94 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Color

To evaluate the aspect of the mucosa and the local tolerance to prasterone ovules, the vaginal color (one of the four main signs of vaginal atrophy) evaluated by the physician/gynecologist as corresponding to none, mild, moderate, or severe atrophy was analyzed using the score values of 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Efficacy analyses were performed primarily on the Intent to Treat (ITT) population defined as all subjects who have received at least one dose of study drug with a baseline (Day 1) evaluation meeting the study entry criteria.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal ColorBaseline2.67 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal ColorWeek 122.34 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal ColorChange from Baseline to Week 12-0.33 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
0.50% Prasterone (DHEA)Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal ColorBaseline2.75 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
0.50% Prasterone (DHEA)Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal ColorWeek 122.03 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
0.50% Prasterone (DHEA)Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal ColorChange from Baseline to Week 12-0.73 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial Integrity

To evaluate the aspect of the mucosa and the local tolerance to prasterone ovules, the vaginal epithelial integrity (one of the four main signs of vaginal atrophy) evaluated by the physician/gynecologist as corresponding to none, mild, moderate, or severe atrophy was analyzed using the score values of 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Efficacy analyses were performed primarily on the Intent to Treat (ITT) population defined as all subjects who have received at least one dose of study drug with a baseline (Day 1) evaluation meeting the study entry criteria.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial IntegrityBaseline2.43 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial IntegrityWeek 122.06 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial IntegrityChange from Baseline to Week 12-0.37 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
0.50% Prasterone (DHEA)Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial IntegrityBaseline2.45 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
0.50% Prasterone (DHEA)Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial IntegrityWeek 121.75 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
0.50% Prasterone (DHEA)Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial IntegrityChange from Baseline to Week 12-0.69 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial Surface Thickness

To evaluate the aspect of the mucosa and the local tolerance to prasterone ovules, the vaginal epithelial surface thickness (one of the four main signs of vaginal atrophy) evaluated by the physician/gynecologist as corresponding to none, mild, moderate, or severe atrophy was analyzed using the score values of 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Efficacy analyses were performed primarily on the Intent to Treat (ITT) population defined as all subjects who have received at least one dose of study drug with a baseline (Day 1) evaluation meeting the study entry criteria.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial Surface ThicknessBaseline2.76 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial Surface ThicknessWeek 122.41 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial Surface ThicknessChange from Baseline to Week 12-0.36 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
0.50% Prasterone (DHEA)Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial Surface ThicknessWeek 122.09 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
0.50% Prasterone (DHEA)Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial Surface ThicknessBaseline2.83 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
0.50% Prasterone (DHEA)Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Epithelial Surface ThicknessChange from Baseline to Week 12-0.74 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal Secretions

To evaluate the aspect of the mucosa and the local tolerance to prasterone ovules, the vaginal secretions (one of the four main signs of vaginal atrophy) evaluated by the physician/gynecologist as corresponding to none, mild, moderate, or severe atrophy were analyzed using the score values of 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Efficacy analyses were performed primarily on the Intent to Treat (ITT) population defined as all subjects who have received at least one dose of study drug with a baseline (Day 1) evaluation meeting the study entry criteria.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal SecretionsChange from Baseline to Week 12-0.39 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal SecretionsBaseline2.63 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal SecretionsWeek 122.24 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06
0.50% Prasterone (DHEA)Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal SecretionsWeek 121.97 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
0.50% Prasterone (DHEA)Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal SecretionsChange from Baseline to Week 12-0.73 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
0.50% Prasterone (DHEA)Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Atrophy as Evaluated From Vaginal SecretionsBaseline2.70 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal Dryness

The severity of vaginal dryness was evaluated by a questionnaire filled out by women. The severity of vaginal dryness recorded as none, mild, moderate or severe was analyzed using the score values of 0, 1, 2 or 3, respectively. Data obtained at Baseline and Week 12 as well as the change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Efficacy analyses on vaginal dryness were performed on a sub-group of the Intent to Treat (ITT) population (defined as all subjects who have received at least one dose of study drug with a baseline (Day 1) evaluation meeting the study entry criteria) who had self-identified moderate to severe vaginal dryness at Baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal DrynessBaseline2.30 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal DrynessWeek 121.13 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal DrynessChange from Baseline to Week 12-1.17 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
0.50% Prasterone (DHEA)Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal DrynessBaseline2.30 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
0.50% Prasterone (DHEA)Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal DrynessWeek 120.86 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
0.50% Prasterone (DHEA)Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Severity of Vaginal DrynessChange from Baseline to Week 12-1.44 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.06

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026