Skip to content

Comparison of cVATS Segmentectomy Versus Lobectomy for Lung Adenocarcinoma in Situ and With Microinvasion

Comparison of Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Segmentectomy Versus Lobectomy for Lung Adenocarcinoma in Situ and With Microinvasion

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02011997
Acronym
cVATS
Enrollment
500
Registered
2013-12-16
Start date
2013-12-31
Completion date
2021-12-31
Last updated
2013-12-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lung Adenocarcinoma, Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage I

Brief summary

This is a Prospective, open-label, parallel, multi-center, Phase III randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of video-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy versus Lobectomy in treating patients with Lung adenocarcinoma in situ or with microinvasion.

Detailed description

Lobectomy has long been considered the standard procedure for early-stage lung cancer, and minimally invasive techniques have been demonstrated to be associated with superior outcomes compared with lobectomy by thoracotomy. the us of segmentectomy is under investigation for selected patients with small tumors, and the use of minimally invasive strategies is applicable as well. This nationwide, multicenter, prospective, randomized open phase III study of cVATS (complete Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery) segmentectomy versus Lobectomy for stage IA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with Lung adenocarcinoma in situ or with microinvasion, is aiming to evaluate the relapse free survival and 5 year overall survival (OS) rate of two types of surgery. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. * Arm I: Patients undergo cVATS lobectomy. * Arm II: Patients undergo cVATS segmentectomy. Patients will be followed up every 3 months within the first year, and annually for 5 years postoperatively.

Interventions

PROCEDUREpatients undergo cVATS segmentectomy
PROCEDUREPatients undergo cVATS lobectomy

Sponsors

The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 79 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Preoperative criteria: peripheral non-small cell lung cancer, no larger than 2 cm in maximal diameter, no lymph node metastasis, FEV1%\>50% (FEV1: Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second); Preoperative imaging:pure ground-glass or mixed ground-glass nodules (part-solid, solid areas \< 0.5cm); Follow-up duration last 3 months or more, HRCT (HRCT: high-resolution computed tomography) lesion maximum diameter was measured three times and took the average, meet the criteria of clinical surgical indications; Intraoperative criteria: histologically confirmed NSCLC, adenocarcinoma in situ or with microinvasion; No prior ipsilateral thoracotomy; No prior anti-neoplastic therapy; EOCG Performance status 0-2; Sufficient organ functions; Written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Active bacterial or fungous infection; Simultaneous or prior (within the past 5 years) other malignant disease; Interstitial pneumonitis, pulmonary fibrosis, or severe COPD (COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease); Abnormal Psychosis; Uncontrollable diabetes mellitus; History of severe cardiovascular disease; Any condition which, in the opinion of the investigator might interfere with the evaluation of the objective.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Relapse-free survivalFrom date of randomization until the date of first documented relapse or metastasis, whichever came first, assessed up to 5 yearsCompare the relapse-free survival (RFS) of patients with lung adenocarcinoma in situ or microinvasion undergoing cVATS segmentectomy vs lobectomy.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
5-year survival rateparticipants are followed until death or up to 5 yearsCompare the 5-year survival rate of patients undergoing cVATS segmentectomy vs lobectomy
postoperative complication0 to 3 months postoperativelyCompare the postoperative complication rate of patients undergoing cVATS segmentectomy vs lobectomy
pulmonary function6 months after surgeryto evaluate the pulmonary function as measured by expiratory flow rate of the two groups 6 months postoperatively
Quality of Life0 to 6 months postoperativeTo evaluate the quality of life (QoL) of these patients, as measured by questionnaire of FACT-L (4th edition) and LCSS (Lung Cancer Symptom Scale)

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactJianxing He, MD
drjianxinghe@163.com83062810

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026