Skip to content

Analgesic Effects of rTMS in Peripheral Neuropathic Pain

Long-term Efficacy of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) of the Motor or Prefrontal Cortex in Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: a Multicenter Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02010281
Acronym
TRANSNEP
Enrollment
152
Registered
2013-12-12
Start date
2014-03-31
Completion date
2019-05-11
Last updated
2019-06-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neuropathic Pain

Keywords

rTMS, peripheral neuropathic pain, randomized controlled trial

Brief summary

This study aims to evaluate the long term efficacy over 25 weeks of repeated sessions of magnetic transcranial stimulation of the motor cortex or prefrontal cortex on average pain intensity, quality of life, sleep, neuropathic symptoms, return to work, in patients with peripheral neuropathic pain. The medical device of study: transcranial magnetic stimulator (TMS).

Detailed description

The present multicenter parallel session randomized placebo controlled study (4 French centers) aims to evaluate the long term efficacy over 25 weeks of repeated sessions of magnetic transcranial stimulation of the motor cortex or prefrontal cortex on average pain intensity (primary outcome) and several secondary outcome measures (e.g. quality of life, sleep, neuropathic symptoms, return to work), in patients with peripheral neuropathic pain. The patients will be randomized to receive one of 3 treatment arms : rTMS of the motor cortex, rTMS of the prefrontal cortex, or placebo (sham stimulation) of the motor or prefrontal cortex. The study will be double blind, eg the patient and the investigator will not know the nature of treatment. the stimulation protocol will consist of an induction phasse of 5 daily sessions then a maintenance phase of several sessions : 3 sessions a week apart, 3 sessions a fortnight apart, and 3 sessions 3 weeks apart. The statistical analysis will be conducted in the intent to treat population and using a modified ITT analysis excluding all the patients with protocol violation (primary outcome). The per protocol population will also be assessed.

Interventions

DEVICErTMS of prefrontal or motor cortex

description:rTMS of the motor or prefrontal cortex (repetitive magnetic stimulation targeting the motor or prefrontal cortex) assisted with neuronavigation

Sponsors

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Peripheral neuropathic pain (unilateral or bilateral) probable or defined according to the criteria proposed in 2008 (Treede et al 2008), 2. Diagnostic DN4 questionnaire score greater than or equal to 4/10 (Bouhassira et al 2005), 3. chronic pain, the average intensity is greater than or equal to 40/100 4. Daily or almost daily pain (at least 4 days out of 7) 5. This pain is present for more than 6 months 6. Patients over 18 and under 75 years old 7. Patients who signed informed consent, 8. Patients whose pain medication is stable for 15 days before inclusion, and will not need to be changed during the study period, 9. Patients who can be monitored during the study period (30 weeks) 10. Patients insured by a health insurance plan or entitled.

Exclusion criteria

1. Previous treatment using rTMS, 2. Work Accident or dispute 3. rTMS Cons-indications (ECT treatment during the previous month, epilepsy and / or a history of epilepsy; history of head trauma, neurosurgical lesion, intracranial hypertension, metal clip, pacemaker, pregnant or lactating women) 4. Abuse of drugs or psychoactive substances (DSM IV) 5. Central neuropathic pain, 6. Neuropathic pain within the framework of a progressive disease (HIV, cancer, non-stabilized system disease) 7. Neuropathic pain very limited extent, of neuroma type 8. Current major depression or psychosis according to DSM IV criteria, 9. Intermittent pain, 10. Pain for less than six months, 11. Presence of another pain more severe than the one justifying the inclusion 12. Lack of proper filling of self-assessment of pain from baseline and randomization (at least 4 weekly pain scores 7 days) notebooks 13. Lack of stability of pain scores on two successive evaluations, defined as a change of more than 30% between the two assessments of the average pain on the short questionnaire about pain between the first two visits inclusion 14. Subject unable to understand informed consent, under guardianship, 15. Subject who refuses to stop or can not stop prohibited treatment during the study, 16. Patients participating in another research protocol involving a drug within 30 days before enrollment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in average pain intensity from baseline to week 25each visit for up to 25 weeksChange in average pain intensity from baseline to week 25, average pain intensity corresponds to average pain over the last 24 hours on the Brief Pain Inventory

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
quality of life assessmenteach visit up to 25 weeksquality of life on the Eurogol questionnaire
Proportion of responders to rTMSat the end of treatment (25 weeks)Proportion of responders (patients whose pain is improved by at least 30% and 50% compared to their pain before treatment
Predictors of the responseBaselineEvaluation of predictors of response (nature of neuropathic symptoms, severity of anxiety or depressive symptoms, presence or absence of mechanical allodynia, or dramatization importance of catastrophism related to pain)
Safety evaluationeach follow up visit for up to 25 weeksCollection of side effects at each session and between sessions of rTMS
Onset of the analgesic effect of rTMSone mont afer the beginning of rTMSDetermine the onset of the analgesic effect based on patient pain diaries for up to 1 month
change in minimal pain intensity over the last 24 hours from baseline to week 25each visit for up 25 weekschange in minimal pain over the last 24 hours on the Brief Pain inventory
Maximal paineach visit up to 25 weeksMaximal pain over the past 24 hours on the Brief Pain Inventory
Pain right noweach visit up to 25 weeksPain right now immediately after each rtMS session and between sessions for up to 25 weeks
Sleepeach visit up to 25 weekssleep quality and quantity on MOS sleep
Neuropathic symptomseach visit up to 25 weeksNeuropathic symptoms on the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory
Return to work25 weeksReturn to work on a specific questionnaire at the end of the study

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 15, 2026