Skip to content

ProMRI Study of the Entovis Pacemaker System (Phase B)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02009696
Enrollment
221
Registered
2013-12-12
Start date
2013-12-31
Completion date
2015-01-31
Last updated
2015-11-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI); Cardiac Pacing

Brief summary

The objective of the ProMRI Study (Phase B) is to demonstrate the clinical safety of the ProMRI Pacemaker System when used under specific MRI conditions without scan exclusion zone.

Interventions

Bradycardia Slow Heart Beat

MRI scan of heart/chest or thoracic spine.

Sponsors

Biotronik, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

The following initial inclusion criteria must be met for a subject to be enrolled and considered for the MRI-procedure: * Age greater than 18 years * Able and willing to complete MRI testing * Able to provide written informed consent * Available for follow-up visit at the study site * Implanted with a pacemaker system consisting only of an Entovis pacemaker (DR-T, SR-T) and one or two Setrox S 53 or Setrox S 60 pacemaker lead(s). (No leads other than Setrox S (53 or 60 cm) leads may be implanted. This includes lead extensions or abandoned leads in the subject.) * Pacemaker implanted pectorally * All pacemaker system components implanted, repositioned, or exchanged at least 5 weeks prior to enrollment * Underling rhythm identifiable during sensing test * All pacing thresholds are measureable and are less than or equal to 2.0 V @0.4 ms * Absence of phrenic nerve stimulation at 4.8V @ 1.0 ms * Pacing impedance is between 200 and 1500 ohm * Able and willing to use the Cardio Messenger At the pre-MRI procedure, the following procedure-related criteria must be met for the subject to undergo the MRI scan: * Absence of phrenic nerve stimulation at 4.8V @ 1.0 ms •\|pacing threshold at Pre-MRI follow-up - pacing threshold at baseline\| ≤ 0.5 V * All pacing thresholds are measureable and are ≤ 2.0 V @ 0.4 ms * The pacemaker system has been implanted for at least 6 weeks. * Subject did not have a pacemaker or lead explant, exchange or reposition in the previous 6 weeks. * All lead impedances are between 200 and 1500 ohm. * Battery status is at least 30% of capacity

Exclusion criteria

* Enrolled in any other clinical study * For pacemaker systems that include an atrial lead, subjects with either * Persistent atrial arrhythmia (lasting longer than 7 days or requiring cardioversion) * Permanent atrial arrhythmia * Life expectancy of less than three months * Pregnancy * Cardiac surgery expected in the next three months Implanted with other medical devices that may interact with MRI, such as: * abandoned pacemaker/ICD leads * lead extensions * mechanical valves * other active medical devices * non-MRI compatible devices * other metallic artifacts/components in body that may interact with MRI

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
MRI and Pacing System Related Serious Adverse Device Effect (SADE) Free Rate1 Month Post-MRI
Percentage of Participants Free of Atrial Pacing Threshold RiseBetween Pre-MRI and 1 Month Post-MRIEvaluate the percentage of atrial pacing leads with a pacing threshold increaess between the Pre-MRI and one-month post-MRI follow-up.
Percentage of Participants Free of Ventricular Pacing Threshold RiseBetween Pre-MRI and 1 Month Post-MRIEvaluate the percentage of ventricular pacing leads with a pacing threshold increase between the Pre-MRI and one-month post-MRI follow-up.
Percentage of Participants Free of P-wave Sensing AttenuationBetween Pre-MRI and 1 Month Post-MRIEvaluate the percentage of subjects who experience P-wave attenuation between the pre-MRI and one-month post-MRI follow-up.
Percentage of Participants Free of R-wave Sensing AttenuationBetween Pre-MRI and 1 Month Post-MRIEvaluate the percentage of subjects who experience R-wave attenuation between the pre-MRI and one-month post-MRI follow-up.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Pacemaker Therapy
Patients with a ProMRI Pacemaker System Patients with a ProMRI Pacemaker System: Bradycardia Slow Heart Beat Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scan: MRI scan of heart/chest or thoracic spine.
221
Total221

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject2

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPacemaker Therapy
Age, Continuous68.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9
Sex: Female, Male
Female
82 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
139 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
38 / 221
serious
Total, serious adverse events
22 / 221

Outcome results

Primary

MRI and Pacing System Related Serious Adverse Device Effect (SADE) Free Rate

Time frame: 1 Month Post-MRI

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Pacemaker TherapyMRI and Pacing System Related Serious Adverse Device Effect (SADE) Free Rate99.5 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants Free of Atrial Pacing Threshold Rise

Evaluate the percentage of atrial pacing leads with a pacing threshold increaess between the Pre-MRI and one-month post-MRI follow-up.

Time frame: Between Pre-MRI and 1 Month Post-MRI

Population: Number of participants with an atrial lead and same atrial threshold polarity (either uni- or bi-polar) at pre-MRI and one-month post-MRI.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Pacemaker TherapyPercentage of Participants Free of Atrial Pacing Threshold Rise100 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants Free of P-wave Sensing Attenuation

Evaluate the percentage of subjects who experience P-wave attenuation between the pre-MRI and one-month post-MRI follow-up.

Time frame: Between Pre-MRI and 1 Month Post-MRI

Population: Number of participants with an atrial lead and same sensing polarity (either uni- or bi-polar) at pre-MRI and one-month post-MRI.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Pacemaker TherapyPercentage of Participants Free of P-wave Sensing Attenuation98.2 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants Free of R-wave Sensing Attenuation

Evaluate the percentage of subjects who experience R-wave attenuation between the pre-MRI and one-month post-MRI follow-up.

Time frame: Between Pre-MRI and 1 Month Post-MRI

Population: Number of participants with a ventricular lead and same ventricular sensing polarity (either uni- or bi-polar) at pre-MRI and one-month post-MRI.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Pacemaker TherapyPercentage of Participants Free of R-wave Sensing Attenuation100 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants Free of Ventricular Pacing Threshold Rise

Evaluate the percentage of ventricular pacing leads with a pacing threshold increase between the Pre-MRI and one-month post-MRI follow-up.

Time frame: Between Pre-MRI and 1 Month Post-MRI

Population: Number of participants with a ventricular lead and same ventricular threshold polarity (either uni- or bi-polar) at pre-MRI and one-month post-MRI.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Pacemaker TherapyPercentage of Participants Free of Ventricular Pacing Threshold Rise100 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026