Skip to content

The Efficacy and Safety of Liraglutide Compared to Sitagliptin, Both in Combination With Metformin in Chinese Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes

The Efficacy and Safety of Liraglutide Compared to Sitagliptin, Both in Combination With Metformin in Chinese Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes.(LIRA-DPP-4 CHINA™)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02008682
Enrollment
368
Registered
2013-12-11
Start date
2013-12-31
Completion date
2014-11-30
Last updated
2017-03-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Brief summary

This trial is conducted in Asia. The aim of this trial is to investigate the efficacy and safety of liraglutide compared to sitagliptin, both as add-on to metformin in Chinese subjects with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy. Eligible subjects will continue their metformin background treatment during the trial.

Interventions

DRUGliraglutide

Administered subcutaneously (s.c., under the skin) once daily as add-on to the subject's stable pre-trial metformin dose.

DRUGsitagliptin

Administered orally once daily as add-on to the subject's stable pre-trial metformin dose.

Sponsors

Novo Nordisk A/S
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female, age at least 18 years and below 80 years at the time of signing informed consent * Subjects diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus and treated with metformin monotherapy at a stable dose of at least 1500 mg daily or maximum tolerated dose above or equal to 1000 mg daily for at least 60 days prior to screening * HbA1c 7.0-10.0% (both inclusive) * Body mass index below or equal to 45.0 kg/m\^2

Exclusion criteria

* Treatment with glucose lowering agent(s) other than stated in the inclusion criteria in a period of 60 days prior to screening. An exception is short-term treatment (below or equal to 7 days in total) with insulin in connection with intercurrent illness * History of chronic pancreatitis or idiopathic acute pancreatitis * Any chronic disorder or severe disease which at the discretion of the investigator might jeopardise subject's safety or compliance with the protocol * Screening calcitonin value above or equal to 50 ng/l * Personal or family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma or multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2 * Diagnosis of malignant neoplasm in the previous 5 years (except basal cell skin cancer or squamous cell skin cancer) * Any contraindications to liraglutide, sitagliptin or metformin according to local labelling

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c)Week 0, week 26Mean change from baseline in glycosylated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 26.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma GlucoseWeek 0, week 26Mean change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) at Week 26.
Change From Baseline in 7-point Self-measured Plasma Glucose ProfileWeek 0, week 26Mean change from baseline in mean of 7-point self-measured plasma glucose at week 26. The 7-point self-measured plasma glucose levels were measured before and after (120 minutes after the start of the meal) the three main meals (breakfast, lunch and dinner), and at bed time.
Subjects Who Achieve (Yes/no) HbA1c Below 7.0 % (American Diabetes Association Target)After 26 weeks of treatmentCalculated as the percentage of subjects achieving treatment target of HbA1c \< 7.0% at Week 26
Subjects Who Achieve (Yes/no) HbA1c Below or Equal to 6.5 % (American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Target)After 26 weeks of treatmentCalculated as the percentage of subjects achieving treatment target of HbA1c \<= 6.5% at Week 26
Number of Confirmed Hypoglycaemic EpisodesWeeks 0-26confirmed hypoglycaemic episode defined as severe (unable to treat her/himself) or biochemically confirmed by a plasma glucose \< 3.1 mmol/L

Countries

China

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This trial was conducted at 25 sites in China.

Pre-assignment details

Between screening and randomisation, eligible subjects were to continue their usual pre-trial metformin dose and dosing frequency.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Liraglutide
subcutaneously, once-daily dose of liraglutide 1.8 mg with metformin at pre-trial stable dose (at least 1500 mg or maximum tolerated dose at least 1000 mg daily). Liraglutide dose was escalated from 0.6 mg/day to 1.8 mg/day during 3-4 weeks.
183
Sitagliptin
orally, once-daily dose of sitagliptin 100 mg with metformin at pre-trial stable dose (at least 1500 mg or maximum tolerated dose at least 1000 mg daily).
184
Total367

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSitagliptinTotalLiraglutide
Age, Continuous51.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
51.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9
51.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7
Body mass index (BMI)27.16 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.029
27.24 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.72
27.32 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.389
Body weight75.78 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.089
75.98 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.33
76.17 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.562
Duration of diabetes5.22 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.4
5.27 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.92
5.31 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.39
Fasting plasma glucose (FPG)9.46 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.237
9.36 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.226
9.26 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.216
Glycosylated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)8.11 Percent (%) glycosylated haemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.78
8.12 Percent (%) glycosylated haemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.806
8.14 Percent (%) glycosylated haemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.833
Sex: Female, Male
Female
67 Participants148 Participants81 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
117 Participants219 Participants102 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
65 / 18314 / 184
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 1836 / 184

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c)

Mean change from baseline in glycosylated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 26.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26

Population: Full analysis set was defined as all randomised and exposed subjects who had any post randomisation data. Missing data was imputed using a mixed model for repeated measurements. The subjects would not contribute to the analyses if they didn't have a corresponding post-baseline value.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LiraglutideChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c)-1.666 Percent (%) glycosylated haemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.9982
SitagliptinChange From Baseline in Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c)-0.969 Percent (%) glycosylated haemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.9742
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 7-point Self-measured Plasma Glucose Profile

Mean change from baseline in mean of 7-point self-measured plasma glucose at week 26. The 7-point self-measured plasma glucose levels were measured before and after (120 minutes after the start of the meal) the three main meals (breakfast, lunch and dinner), and at bed time.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26

Population: Full analysis set was defined as all randomised and exposed subjects who had any post randomisation data. Missing data was imputed using a mixed model for repeated measurements. The subjects would not contribute to the analyses if they didn't have a corresponding post-baseline value.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LiraglutideChange From Baseline in 7-point Self-measured Plasma Glucose Profile-2.25 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.244
SitagliptinChange From Baseline in 7-point Self-measured Plasma Glucose Profile-1.36 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.204
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose

Mean change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) at Week 26.

Time frame: Week 0, week 26

Population: Full analysis set was defined as all randomised and exposed subjects who had any post randomisation data. Missing data was imputed using a mixed model for repeated measurements. The subjects would not contribute to the analyses if they didn't have a corresponding post-baseline value.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LiraglutideChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose-2.347 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.1655
SitagliptinChange From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose-1.205 mmol/LStandard Deviation 2.2961
Secondary

Number of Confirmed Hypoglycaemic Episodes

confirmed hypoglycaemic episode defined as severe (unable to treat her/himself) or biochemically confirmed by a plasma glucose \< 3.1 mmol/L

Time frame: Weeks 0-26

Population: Safety analysis set included all subjects receiving at least one dose of investigational product.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
LiraglutideNumber of Confirmed Hypoglycaemic Episodes2 episodes
SitagliptinNumber of Confirmed Hypoglycaemic Episodes1 episodes
Secondary

Subjects Who Achieve (Yes/no) HbA1c Below 7.0 % (American Diabetes Association Target)

Calculated as the percentage of subjects achieving treatment target of HbA1c \< 7.0% at Week 26

Time frame: After 26 weeks of treatment

Population: Full analysis set was defined as all randomised and exposed subjects who had any post randomisation data. Missing data was imputed using a mixed model for repeated measurements. The subjects would not contribute to the analyses if they didn't have a corresponding post-baseline value.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
LiraglutideSubjects Who Achieve (Yes/no) HbA1c Below 7.0 % (American Diabetes Association Target)76.5 percentage of subjects
SitagliptinSubjects Who Achieve (Yes/no) HbA1c Below 7.0 % (American Diabetes Association Target)52.6 percentage of subjects
Secondary

Subjects Who Achieve (Yes/no) HbA1c Below or Equal to 6.5 % (American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Target)

Calculated as the percentage of subjects achieving treatment target of HbA1c \<= 6.5% at Week 26

Time frame: After 26 weeks of treatment

Population: Full analysis set was defined as all randomised and exposed subjects who had any post randomisation data. Missing data was imputed using a mixed model for repeated measurements. The subjects would not contribute to the analyses if they didn't have a corresponding post-baseline value.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
LiraglutideSubjects Who Achieve (Yes/no) HbA1c Below or Equal to 6.5 % (American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Target)61.7 percentage of subjects
SitagliptinSubjects Who Achieve (Yes/no) HbA1c Below or Equal to 6.5 % (American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Target)26.3 percentage of subjects

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 13, 2026