Skip to content

Comparison of Two Protocols of Optimization of X Ray Radiations in Pediatric Interventional Neuroradiology

Comparison of Two Protocols of Optimization of X Ray Radiations in Pediatric Interventional Neuroradiology

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02008305
Acronym
MINIRAD
Enrollment
2
Registered
2013-12-11
Start date
2013-11-30
Completion date
2016-11-30
Last updated
2017-02-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Occlusion or Malformation of a Cerebral Vessel

Brief summary

Interventional Neuroradiology replaces surgery. This technology requires various exposition to X rays : number of X rays photographs, radioscopy, distance between patient and detector, speed of acquisition of X-rays photographs, high tension and intensity. The manipulator must find the right balance between quality of photographs and dose delivered to the patient (optimization). Children are particularly exposed to these risks of irradiation (sensitivity to X-rays and long life expectancy with risks. So, it is fundamental to optimize the dose delivered during the procedures. The investigators propose to analyse a study comparing two protocols of optimization of doses. The investigators' hypothesis is that the protocol experimented in this trial allows less radiation of the children, compared to the usual protocol.

Interventions

DEVICEprotocol of optimization ALARA
DEVICEprotocol of optimization Philips

Sponsors

Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 14 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* malformation or occlusion of a cerebral vessel requiring interventional Neuroradiology

Exclusion criteria

* opposition ot the parent(s) to the participation of their child in the trial and/or no social security.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Comparison of the average dose per child, according to the protocolmaximum one day per patient

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
number of X-rays photographs according to the protocol, quality of photographs according to the protocol,maximum one day per patient

Other

MeasureTime frame
number of interrupted dosingone day per patient

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026