Skip to content

Comparison of Pneumatic and Electromagnetic Muscle Vibrators to Stimulate Muscle Proprioceptors

Comparison of fMRI Compatible Pneumatic and Electromagnetic Muscle Vibrators to Stimulate Muscle Proprioceptors

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02007135
Enrollment
10
Registered
2013-12-10
Start date
2013-11-30
Completion date
2015-10-31
Last updated
2015-10-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Proprioceptive Postural Control

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the concurrent validity of a newly developed pneumatic, fMRI compatible muscle vibrator as compared to a electromagnetic muscle vibrator in the stimulation of muscle proprioceptors.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
CollaboratorOTHER
KU Leuven
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

for healthy individuals: * Age: 20-45 years old * No history of low back pain * A score of 0% on the Oswestry Disability Index * Willingness to sign the informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* History of major trauma and/or major orthopedic surgery of the spine, pelvis or lower quadrant * One of the following conditions: Parkinson, MS, Stroke with sequels.... * Radicular symptoms * Not Dutch-speaking * Strong opioids * Neck pain * Ankle problems * Smoking

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proprioceptive postural control6 monthsCenter of pressure displacement on a force plate in standing in response to local muscle vibration on ankle and back muscles to specifically detect the role of proprioception in postural control.

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026