Stroke
Conditions
Keywords
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, postural, balance, mobility, leg, stroke
Brief summary
To use repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to treat stroke patients is getting a popular idea. Previous studies seemed to support its effects on facilitating motor recovery after stroke. This study focuses on the motor recovery of lower extremities. Investigators conducted the study to evaluate the treatment effect of rTMS on the functional performance of lower extremities in terms of postural control, balance, and mobility in stroke patients. Investigators hypothesized that these performances could be improved through the better motor control of lower extremities caused by rTMS.
Detailed description
Protocol: 1. Setting: inpatient rehabilitation department of Shuang-Ho Hospital. 2. Study population: Patients received inpatient treatment or rehabilitation for stroke in Shuang-Ho Hospital (SHH). 3. Eligibility. Screening for eligibility was done by the 2 physiatrists from rehabilitation department of SHH. 4. Study design: controlled trial with stratified randomization 5. Blinding 1. The patients were blinded by the real or sham coil of rTMS 2. The assessors who performed the outcome measurements were blinded to the assignment of treatment. 6. Measurements. 1. Baseline demographic records. The stroke severity was measured by National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Modified Rankin Scale (MRS), Brunnstrum stage, and Manual muscle test (MMT) before intervention. 2. Clinical assessments. * Postural control was assessed by Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (PASS) * The motor recovery of lower extremities was assessed by the lower extremity subscale of Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-LE) * The balance and gait subscales of Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA-b and POMA-g) * Timed Up and Go (TUG) test was used to assess the gross mobility. * Barthel Index (BI) for the ADL independence * modified Rankin Scale (MRS) for disability classification were also collected. 3. These measurements (including the clinical and corticomotor excitability assessments) are performed by one researcher who are responsible for the measurements. 7. Compliance and side effect. The compliance of interventions were investigated. The attendance of treatments (including rTMS sessions and physical therapy sessions) and possible side effect/discomfort were recorded during the interventions by a researcher. He also tries to understand the reason of drop-out from the study.
Interventions
DEVICErTMS
Interventions started on the next weekday after pretest and were performed once a day for 15 consecutive weekdays. Participants in the E and C groups received rTMS (either real or sham, 1 Hz, 15 minutes), followed by a session of physical therapy for 45 minutes.
Sponsors
Taipei Medical University WanFang Hospital
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* unilateral hemiplegia caused by the stroke, * first ever stroke, * time since stroke: 10-90 days, * age: 18-80 y/o, * Functional ambulation classification (FAC): 0-2,
Exclusion criteria
* contraindication to TMS (eg, pacemaker, seizure history, pregnancy), * cranial metal implants * intracranial hemorrhage associated with tumor or arteriovenous malformation, craniotomy * able to complete Timed Up and Go (TUG) test within 2 minutes * unable to walk normally before the stroke * those whose motor evoked potentials (MEP) of M1-UH were absent in the pretest
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Timed Up and Go (TUG) | Up to 3 months after interventions completed |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| the lower extremity subscale of Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-LE) | up to 3 months after the intervention completed | — |
| The balance and gait subscales of Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA-b and POMA-g) | up to 3 months after the interventions completed | — |
| Barthel Index (BI) | Up to 3 months after interventions completed | — |
| Postural control was assessed by Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke (PASS) | up to 3 months after the intervention completed | PASS which examines the patient's ability to maintain or change a given posture and is applicable to patients with very poor postural performance. This instrument has been reported to have a good validity and reliability at different recovery stages after stroke, minimal floor and ceiling effect, and be sensitive to changes in severe stroke patients at early stage after stroke. |
| modified Rankin Scale (MRS) | Up to 3 months after interventions completed | — |
Countries
Taiwan
Outcome results
None listed